Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22626/jkfrma.2019.23.3.003

Analysis of Influence of Work and family life priority and Recognition Difference of Work-Family Reconciliation Policy on Satisfaction of Working Condition Using Path Analysis Model : Focused on Industrial Groups Showing Gender Differences  

Park, Min Jung (Seoul Foundation of Women & Family, Department of Family Policy Work Life Balance Center)
Publication Information
Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review / v.23, no.3, 2019 , pp. 43-74 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of perceptions of work and family life on employee job satisfaction and to form a policy approach that contributes to the enhancement of worker satisfaction. In particular, we wanted to analyze how the characteristics of each variable appeared in industry groups with different gender ratios of workers. A notable point of the study was that the respondents who answered that work and family had similar importance were satisfied with their working conditions. In addition, it was found that the higher an employee's evaluation of the work-family reconciliation policy, the higher the employee's satisfaction with their working conditions. As a result of a path analysis, it was found that the most male-dominant industry was manufacturing, and the most female-dominant industry was health and social welfare. In the case of respondents who were employed in the most-male dominant industry, the degree of an employee's understanding of the work-family reconciliation policy recognition, rather than the relative priorities of work and family life, had a greater effect on job satisfaction. On the other hand, respondents who were employed in the most-female dominant industry confirmed that their level of education was highly related to the degree of institutional recognition.
Keywords
work-family reconciliation policy; satisfaction of working condition; path model analysis; work and family life priority; industrial groups showing gender differences;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 유수현(2013). 기혼여성 근로자의 일.가정갈등이 직무만족에 미치는 영향분석. 서울대학교 행정대학원 석사학위논문.
2 이찬영(2008). 청년층 임금근로자의 하향취업 행태. 직업능력개발연구, 11(3), 49-69.
3 장지연(2001). 비정규노동의 실태와 쟁점 -성별 차이를 중심으로. 경제와 사회 , 151, 68-96.
4 정기선.장은미(2005). 가족친화적 정책이 종업원들의 조직몰입에 미치는 효과. 가족문화, 17(1), 59-84.
5 조은미(2009). 기혼여성 임금근로자의 일.가정 양립이 직무만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대구대학교 석사학위논문.
6 조혜선(2002). 성별 분리와 가치 차별에 대한 다층분석. 노동정책연구, 2(3), 1-29.
7 통계청(2017). 사회조사보고서.
8 통계청(2019). 4월 고용 통향.
9 허은(2013). 노동시장 계층별 성별직업분리에 관한 연구. 한국사회학회지, 47(2), 241-266.
10 황수경(2003), 내부자(Insiders) 노동시장과 외부자(Outsiders) 노동시장의 구조 분석을 위한 탐색적 연구. 노동정책연구, 3(3), 49-86.
11 Alan L. Saltzstein, Yuan Ting & Grace Hall Saltzstein(2001). 'Work-Family Balance and Job Satisfaction: The Impact of Family-Friendly Policies on Attitudes of Federal Government Employees. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 452-67.   DOI
12 Alba-Ramirez, A(1993). Mismatch in the Spanish Labour Market : Overeducation. Journal of Human Resource, 27, 259-278.   DOI
13 Allen, Jim & van der Velden, R.(2001). Educational mismatches versus skill mismatches: Effects on wages, job satisfaction and on-the-job search. Oxford Economic Paper, 3, 434-452.   DOI
14 Anker, R.(1997). Theories of occupational segregation by sex: An overview. International Labour Review, 136(3), 315-339.
15 Baxter & Wright(2000). The Glass Ceiling Hypothesis: A Comparative Study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14(2), 275-294.   DOI
16 Bellas. M. L.(1994). Comparable Worth in Academia: The Effects on Faculty Salaries of the Sex Composition and Labor-Market Conditions of Academic Disciplines. American Sociological Review, 59(6), 807-821.   DOI
17 Bielby, William T. & Baron, James N.(1986). Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 759-799.   DOI
18 Buchel, F. & F. Mertins(2004). Overeducation and Skill Endowments: The role of school achievement and vocational training quality. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 150-166.   DOI
19 Blau, F. D., Brummund. P. & A. Yung-Hsu Liu.(2013). Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970-2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational coding System. Demography, 50, 471-492.   DOI
20 Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A. & A. E. Winkler (2010). The economics of women, men, and work(6th ed.). Upper Saddle river. Nj: Prentice Hall.
21 Cohen, Lisa, Joseph Broschak, & Heather Haveman(1998). And Then There Were More? The Effect of Organizational Sex Composition on the Hiring and Promoting of Managers. American Sociological Review, 63, 711-727.   DOI
22 Dolton, P. & Vignoles, A.(2000). The Incidence and Effects of Overeducation in the U.K. graduate Labour Market. Economics of Education Review, 19, 179-198.   DOI
23 Gorman, E. H. & J. A. Kmec.(2009). Hierarchical Rank and Women's Organizational Mobility: Glass Ceilings in Corporate Law Firms. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1428-1474.   DOI
24 Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R.(1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology. 60, 159-170.   DOI
25 Hackman. J. R. & Oldham, G. R.(1976). Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 16, 250-279   DOI
26 Hartog, Joop.(2000). Over-education and Earnings: Where are we, Where should We Go?. Economics of Education Review 19(2000): 131-147.   DOI
27 Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
28 Heilman, M. E.(2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.   DOI
29 Hoppock, R.(1935). Job satisfaction, New York: Harper and Brother.
30 Johnson, A. A.(1995). The Business Case for Work-Family Program. Journal of Accountancy, 180, 53-62.
31 Kossek, E. E., & V. Nichol.(1992). The Effects of On-site Child Care on Employee Care on Employee Attitudes and Performance. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 485-509.   DOI
32 Konrad, A. M. & Pfeffer, J.(1991). Understanding the Hiring of Women and Minorities in Educational Institutions. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 141-157.   DOI
33 Levanon, J. Y., England. P. & P. Alison (2009). Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing causal Dynamics using 1950-2000 U.S. Census Data. Social forces, 88, 865-981.   DOI
34 Locke, E. A.(1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette(ed.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
35 McCormick, E. J. & J. Tiffin(1974). Industrial Psychology. Englewood Cliffs. NJ : Prentice-Hall.
36 Miskel, C. G.(1977). Bureaucratic Structure, Organizational Processes & Three Dimensions of Effectiveness, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of area at New York.
37 Nieva, V. G. & Gutek, B. A.(1980). Women and Work : A Psychological Perspective, New York: Praeger.
38 Porter, L. W., R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday & P. Boulian.(1974). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.   DOI
39 Peterson, T., & Saporta I.(2004). The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 852-901.   DOI
40 Pincus, J. D., & Rayfield, R. E.(1989). Organizational communication and job satisfaction: A meta research perspective. Communication Science, 25(2), 1-12.
41 Porter, L.W.,& Lawler,E.E.(1968). Managerial attitudes and performance, R.D. Irwin (Homewood, III).
42 Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W.(1990). Wilford Hall Medical Center retention survey. TX: Lackland Air Force Base
43 Reskin BF, & Bielby DD.(2005). A sociological perspective on gender and career outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005(19), 71-86.   DOI
44 Reskin, Barbara F., Debra B. McBrier, & Julie A. Kmec.(1999). The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition. Annual Review Sociology, 25, 335-361   DOI
45 Reskin, B., & Padavic, I.(1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46 Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L. & Noe, A. W.(1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 263-267.   DOI
47 Schneider, B., Goldstein, J. R., & Smith, D. B.(1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773.   DOI
48 Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L.(1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Skokie, IL: Rand-McNally.
49 Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W.(1975). Motivation & Work Behavior, New York. : McGraw-Hill Book Co.
50 Spreitzer, G. & C. Porath(2012). Creating sustainable performance. Harvard Business Review, 90(1), 92-99.
51 Stier, H. & Yaish, M.(2008). The determinants of women's employment dynamics: The case of Israeli women. European Sociological Review. 24(3). 363-377.   DOI
52 Stier, H. & Yaish, M.(2014). Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: a multi-level approach. Work, Employment and Society, 28(2), 225-246.   DOI
53 Tomaskovic-Devey, D.(1993). Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation, Cornell University Press, ILR Press.
54 Tomaskovic-Devey, D.(2014), The Relational Generation of Workplace Inequalities, Social Currents, 11(1), 51-73.   DOI
55 Weiss, H. M. (2002). Introductory comments: Antecedents of emotional experiences at work. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 1-2.   DOI
56 Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H. & C. Zhang (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 621-644.   DOI
57 김근주(2017). 일.가정양립지원제도의 유형과 체계. 노동리뷰, 2017(2), 9-22.
58 고용노동부(2018). 고용보험통계연보.
59 권태희(2010). 유연근로가 여성 관리자의 직장-가정양립에 미치는 효과 여성연구. 한국여성정책연구원, 73, 5-30.
60 금재호(2000). 비정규직 함정은 존재하는가?. 한국노동연구원, 분기별 노동동향, 2000년 4/4분기.
61 김기헌(2005). 교육과 직무의 불일치: 한일 대학졸업자들을 중심으로. 교육사회연구, 15(3), 51-77.
62 김성국(1997), 조직과 인간행동, 서울: 명경사.
63 김애실(2004). 직종분리와 직종별, 성별 임금격차. 한국여성경제학회학술발표논문집.
64 김은주.한인수(2015). 여성관리자의 일.가정 상호관계와 조직성과. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 15(10), 436-446.   DOI
65 김일경(2013). 가족친화제도의 활용 용이성과 직무만족간의 관계에 대한 연구: 일.가정 양립갈등의 매개효과를 중심으로. 서울대학교 행정대학원 석사학위논문.
66 김주섭.이상준(2005). 청년층의 고학력화에 따른 학력과잉 실태분석. 노동정책연구, 5 (2), 1-29.
67 김혜정(2011). 일.가정양립 정책에 대한 젠더 비평적 분석. 여성학연구, 21(2), 113-152.
68 남호순(2001). 국공립과 사립보육시설 보육교사의 직무만족도에 관한 비교 연구. 강남 대학교 사회사업대학원 석사학위논문.
69 민경률.박성민(2013). 유연근무제가 조직결과에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구: 공공조직 내 개혁가치의 조절효과를 중심으로. 한국행정논집, 25, 1211-1249.
70 박광표.김동철(2019). 직무만족과 조직몰입이 삶의 만족에 미치는 영향: 고용특성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 노동정책연구, 19(1), 59-91.   DOI
71 박성재.반정호(2007). 청년층의 하향취업 원인과 노동시장 성과. 사회보장연구, 23 (4), 1-28.
72 박성준.황상인(2005). 청년층 과잉학력이 임금에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석:경제위기 전.후를 중심으로. 노동경제논집, 28(3), 1-37.
73 박세영(2011). 생활만족에 대한 직무만족과 여가만족의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24 (2), 331-353.   DOI
74 사람인 (2019.5.23.). 사상 최악의 취업난에도 조기퇴사자 늘어. http://www.saramin.co.kr/zf_user/help/live/view?idx=98044&listType=news
75 박수연.박정애(2000). 교육조직론. 서울:교육과학사.
76 박재춘(2017). 직무만족, 생활만족 및 조직몰입의 관계 : 생활만족의 매개효과와 고용형태의 조절효과를 중심으로, 노동정책연구, 17(1), 27-54.   DOI
77 박종서(2017). 일.가정 양립 정책 추진 현황과 개선 방향, 보건복지포럼, 249, 18-33.
78 미래창조과학부(2017). 10년후 대한민국, 미래일자리의 길을 찾다.
79 사명철(2015). 성별 직종분리의 변화와 임금효과. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문.
80 송영선.이희수(2013). 평생교육기관의 학습조직화를 위한 구성원의 다문화 수용성 탐색: 무형식 학습과 집단지성의 연계를 중심으로, 평생학습사회, 9(2), 1-22.
81 신선미, 김종숙, 임후남(2011). 여성 박사인력의 교육-고용 불일치 실태와 과제: 녹색성장관련 전공과 기타 전공 간 비교. 한국여성정책연구원 보고서.
82 오선균(2001). 보육교사 직무만족과 소진에 관한 연구. 청주대학교 행정대학원 석사학위논문.
83 유계숙(2007). 가족친화 기업정책의 시행 및 이용여부와 근로자의 직업만족도, 이직의도, 직무성과. 가족과 문화, 19(2), 35-59.