Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2007.11.5.071

Seismic performance evaluation of circular composite columns by shaking table test  

Shim, Chang-Su (중앙대학교 토목공학과)
Chung, Young-Soo (중앙대학교 토목공학과)
Park, Ji-Ho (중앙대학교 토목공학과)
Park, Chang-Young (중앙대학교 토목공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.11, no.5, 2007 , pp. 71-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
For the design of composite bridge piers, detail requirements for the reinforcements is not clear to satisfy the required seismic performance. Composite bridge piers were suggested to reduce the sectional dimensions and to enhance the ductility of the columns under earthquake loadings. In this paper, five specimens of concrete encased composite columns of 400mm diameter with single core steel were fabricated to investigate the seismic performance of the composite columns. Shaking table tests and a Pseudo-Dynamic test were carried out and structural behavior of small-scaled models considering near-fault motions was evaluated. Test parameters were the pace of the transverse reinforcement, lap splice of longitudinal reinforcement and encased steel member sections. The displacement ductility from shaking table tests was lower than that from the pseudo-dynamic test. Limited ductile design and 50% lap splice of longitudinal reinforcement reduced the displacement ductility. Steel ratio showed significant effect on the ultimate strength. Lap splice and low transverse reinforcements reduced the displacement capacity. The energy dissipation capacity of composite columns did not show significant difference according to details.
Keywords
Composite piers; Seismic performance; Shaking table test; Near fault motion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 도로교설계기준 한국도로교통협회, 건설교통부, 2005
2 AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th Ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, USA, 2004 SI unit Edition
3 ATC-32 Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridge Provisional Recommendations. Applied Technology Council, 1996, pp.8-1-8-58
4 Caltrans Bridge Design Specification, California Department of Transportation. 2004, pp. 107-118
5 Eurocode 8. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 2. Bridges. European Committee for Standardization; 2002
6 New Zealand Standard, 'Concrete Structures Standard : Part 1-The Design of Concrete Structures', NZS 3101, 1995
7 심창수,정영수,민진,정인근,한정훈,'SRC합성교각의 설계에 대한 고찰', 한국 콘크리트학회 2005 봄학술 발표회 논문집, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2005, pp. 439-442
8 한정훈,박창규,심창수,정영수,'준정적 실험에 의한SRC합성교각의 내진성능 평가',한국 지진공학회 논문집, 통권 50호, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2006, pp. 85-94   과학기술학회마을   DOI
9 Phan, Vu T., 'Near Fault (Near Field) Ground Motion Effects on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns', Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, August 2005
10 Paulay T. and Priestley M.J.N Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, John Wiley & Sons, INC., 1992, pp. 744
11 ACI Committee 318 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-05) and Commentary (ACI318R-05). American Concrete Institute, 2005
12 김정한, 김재관, '안정대륙권역의 중규모지진에 의한 근단층지반운동의 모델링', 한국 지진공학회 논문집, 제 10권, 제3호, 2006, pp. 101-111   과학기술학회마을   DOI