Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2012.15.2.148

Is the Strong Fixation Necessary in Performing Biceps Tenodesis?  

Song, Hyun Seok (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St.Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Choi, Woo Hyuk (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St.Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow / v.15, no.2, 2012 , pp. 148-153 More about this Journal
Abstract
Various biceps tenodesis techniques being used, make it difficult to compare the result of reports. First, the biceps tenodesis could be classified according to being performed by open incision or by the arthroscopic procedure. Second, it could be classified as a soft tissue and bony tenodesis according to the tissue which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Third, it could be classified as a proximal and distal tenodesis according to the location which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Fourth, it could be classified according to the implant (interference screw, suture anchor, knotless suture anchor). A decision should be suspended until an appropriate strength of tenodesis is revealed.
Keywords
Strength; Tenodesis; Biceps Long Head; Shoulder;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Elkousy HA, Fluhme DJ, O'Connor DP, Rodosky MW. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the percutaneous, intra-articular trans-tendon technique: preliminary results. Orthopedics. 2005;28:1316-9.
2 George MS. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Orthopedics. 2008;31:552-5.   DOI
3 Lafosse L, Shah AA, Butler RB, Fowler RL. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis to supraspinatus tendon: technical note. Am J Orthop. 2011;40: 345-7.
4 Scheibel M, Schroder RJ, Chen J, Bartsch M. Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1046-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Froimson AI, O I. Keyhole tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:245-9.
6 Kusma M, Dienst M, Eckert J, Steimer O, Kohn D. Tenodesis of the long head of biceps brachii: cyclic testing of five methods of fixation in a porcine model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:967-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O et al. Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:992-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jayamoorthy T, Field JR, Costi JJ, Martin DK, Stanley RM, Hearn TC. Biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study of fixation methods. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:160-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Amaravathi RS, Pankappilly B, Kany J. Arthroscopic keyhole proximal biceps tenodesis: a technical note. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19:379-83.   DOI
10 Gartsman GM, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: operative technique. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:550-2.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Richards DP, Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic-assisted biceps tenodesis for ruptures of the long head of biceps brachii: The cobra procedure. Arthroscopy. 2004;20 Suppl 2:201-7.
12 Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:206-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sanders B, Lavery KP, Pennington S, Warner JJ. Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:66-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Patzer T, Santo G, Olender GD, Wellmann M, Hurschler C, Schofer MD. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:116-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jarrett CD, McClelland WB, Jr., Xerogeanes JW. Minimally invasive proximal biceps tenodesis: an anatomical study for optimal placement and safe surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:477-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Millett PJ, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner JJ. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:121.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Richards DP, Burkhart SS. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:861-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1296-306.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Golish SR, Caldwell PE, 3rd, Miller MD et al. Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1103-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Papp DF, Skelley NW, Sutter EG et al. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e275-8.
21 Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:764-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:576-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA. Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1922-9.   DOI