Browse > Article

Situating the Anthropocene: The Social Construction of the Pohang 'Triggered' Earthquake  

KIM, Kiheung (포항공대 인문사회학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.19, no.3, 2019 , pp. 51-117 More about this Journal
Abstract
On 15th November 2017, the coastal city of Pohang, located in the Southeastern part of South Korea was shaken by a magnitude 5.4 earthquake. The earthquake displaced more than 1,700 residents and caused more than $ 300 million dollars of economic loss. It was the second most damaging earthquake in the history of Korea. Soon after the earthquake, a group of scientists raised a possible link between the first Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) project and the earthquake. At the same time, another group of scientists put forward a different hypothesis of the causation of the earthquake claiming that it was caused by the geological movements that were initiated by the Great Tohoku Earthquake in 2011. Since then, there were scientific debates between the two different groups of scientists. The scientific debate on the causation of the earthquake has been concluded temporarily by the Research Investigatory Committee on the Pohang Earthquake in 2019. The research committee concluded that the earthquake was caused by the Pohang EGS system: this means that the earthquake can be defined not as a natural earthquake, but as an artificially triggered earthquake. This article is to examine the Pohang earthquake can be defined as an Anthropocenic event. The newly suggested concept, the Anthropocene is a relatively novel term to classify the earthly strata and their relationship to geological time. The current geological period should be defined by human activities and man-made earthly environment. Although the term is basically related to geological classification, the Anthropocene has been widely debated amongst humanist and social science scholars. The current disastrous situation of our planet also implies with the Anthropocene. This paper is to discuss how to understand anthropogenic events. In particular, the paper pays attention to two different scholarly positions on the Anthropocene: Isabelle Stenger's Gaia theory and Barbara Herrnstein Smith's relativist theory. The former focuses on the earthly inevitable catastrophe of Anthropocene while the latter suggests to situate and contextualise anthropogenic events. On the basis of the theoretical positions, the article is to analyse how the Pohang earthquake can be located and situated.
Keywords
Anthropocene, Contextualization; Disaster, Pohang Earthquake; Triggered Earthquake;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Nanda, V. P. ed. (2011), Climate Change and Environmental Ethics. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
2 Olasolo, P., Juarez, M. C., Morales, M. P., D'Amico, S. & Liarte, I. A. (2016), "Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS): A Review", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 56, pp. 133-144.   DOI
3 Pedersen, J. V. S., Latour, B. & Schultz, N. (2019), "A Conversation with Bruno Latour and Nikolaj Schultz: Reassembling the Geo-Social", Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, pp. 1-16.
4 Pinch, T.J. & Bijker, W.E. (1984), "The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 399-441.   DOI
5 Qiu, J. (2012), "Evidence Mounts for Dam-quake Link", Science, Vol. 336, p. 291.   DOI
6 Gupta, H. K. (2002), "A Review of Recent Studies of Triggered Earthquakes by Artificial Water Reservoirs with Special Emphasis on Earthquakes in Koyna, India", Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 58, pp. 279-310.   DOI
7 Rudwick, M. J. S. (2007), Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8 Qiu, X. & Fenton, C. (2015), "Factors Controlling the Occurrence of Reservoir-Induced Seismicity", Lollino, G., Giordan, D., Thuro, K., Carranza-Torres, C., Wu, F., Marinos, P., and Delgado, C. eds. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory: Volume 6. Applied Geology for Major Engineering Projects, pp. 567-570, Dordrecht: Springer.
9 Rosen, J. (2015), "Pumped up to Rumble", Science, Vol. 348, No. 6241, p. 1299.   DOI
10 Rudwick, M. J. S. (1985), The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11 Rudwick, M. J. S. (2014), Earth's Deep History: How It Was Discovered and Why It Matters, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12 Serres, M. (1995), The Natural Contract, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
13 Sismondo, S. (1993), "Some Social Constructions", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 515-553.   DOI
14 Smith, B. H. (1997), Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversies, Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
15 Smith, B. H. (2018), Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene: On Science, Belief and the Humanities, London: Open Humanities Press
16 Sohn, Y. K. & Son, M. (2004), "Synrift Stratigraphic Geometry in a Transfer Zone Coarse-Grained Delta Complex, Miocene Pohang Basin, SE Korea", Sedimentology, Vol. 51, pp. 1387-1408.   DOI
17 Sperling, A. (2019), "Anthropocene", in Goodman, R. T. ed., The Bloomsbury Handbook of 21st-Centry Feminist Theory, pp. 311-324, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
18 강찬수 (2017. 11. 15), 경북 포항서 규모 5.4 지진. 서울 광화문까지 흔들렸다, 중앙일보.
19 11.15 지진 지열발전 공동연구단 (2018) 포항지진과 지열발전과의 연관성 보고회 자료집 (포항, 2018년 12월 19일).
20 강찬수 (2018. 6. 23), 지진화산 빈발 '불의 고리' 50년 주기설을 사실일까, 중앙일보.
21 강태섭.이준기 (2016) 경주 주변 지역의 역사 지진활동고찰, 대한지질학회 학술대회 발표자료(2016.09.12), 6쪽, 대한지질학회.
22 고재원 (2019. 4. 22), 잇따라 발생한 동해지진, 동해 대지진의 전조인가?, 동아사이언스.
23 김민수 (2019. 2. 10), 포항 앞바다 이례적 규모 4.1 지진, '예상 못한 지역서 발생', 동아사이언스.
24 Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007), "The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature", Ambio: A Journal of the human Environment, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 614-621,   DOI
25 기상청 (2018), 포항지진 분석보고서, 기상청.
26 김기흥 (2018), 사회구성주의를 변호하며: 사회와 자연의 사회적 구성과 자기 준거성에 대하여, 사회와 이론, 제32권 2호, 101-143쪽.
27 김다혜 (2017. 11. 24), 포항지진, 지열발전소 연관성 놓고 전문가 의견 엇갈려, 머니투데이.
28 김민수 (2018. 4. 27), 포항지진 원인 지열발전 논란 가중-사이언스지에 논문 2편 발표, 조선비즈.
29 Stengers, I. (2015b), In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism, London: Open Humanities Press.
30 Stengers, I. (2015a), "Accepting the Reality of Gaia: A Fundamental Shift?", in Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., & Gemenne, F. eds., The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, pp. 134-144, London: Routledge.
31 Stengers, I. (2017a), "Autonomy and the Intrusion of Gaia", South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol. 116, pp. 381-400.   DOI
32 Stengers, I. (2017b), Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, Cambridge: Polity.
33 Stiegler, B. (2017), "Escaping the Anthropocene" in Magatti, M. ed., The Crisis Conundrum: How to Reconcile Economy and Society, pp. 149-163, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
34 Visconti, G. (2014), "Anthropocene: Another Academic Invention?", Rendiconti Lincei, Vol. 25, pp. 381-392.   DOI
35 Voosen, P. (2018. 4. 26), "Second-largest Earthquake in Modern South Korean History Tied to Geothermal Plant", Science News.
36 Walsh III, F. R. & Zoback, M. D. (2015), "Oklahoma's Recent Earthquakes and Saltwater disposal", Science Advances, 1 (e1500195, 18 June 2015), pp. 1-9.
37 Whitehead, A. N. (1938), Modes of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38 Zalasiewicz, J. Willimans, M., Haywood, A. & Ellis, M. (2011), "The Anthropocene: A New Epoch of Geological Time?", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A., Vol. 369, No. 1983, pp. 835-841.   DOI
39 김성균.이정모 (2019), 2016년 규모 5.8 경주지진과 2017년 규모 5.4 포항지진의 여진활동규모, 지질학회지, 제 55권 2호, 207-218쪽.
40 김서연 (2017. 11. 16), 포항지진, '지열발전소'가 원인일 가능성 크다, 서울신문.
41 김정현 (2018. 5. 6), '포항지진 방아쇠는 지열발전소' 어떻게 연구했나?, 한국대학신문.
42 김정혜 (2017. 11. 16), 포항지열발전소, "지진이 우리 때문? 절대아냐", 한국일보.
43 김준홍.김원규 (2018),포항 지진 1년, 치유되지 않은 상흔 - 끝나지 않은 싸움의 기록, 포스텍 융합문명연구소 엮음, 포항지진 1년, 지금도 계속되는 삶의 여진, 19-28쪽, 포스텍융합문명연구소.
44 김환석 (2011), 행위자-연결망 이론에서 보는 과학기술과 민주주의, 동향과 전망, 10월호, 11-46쪽.
45 김환석 (2017), 코스모폴리틱스 (Cosmopolitics)와 기술사회의 민주주의, 사회과학연구, 제30권 1호, 1-18쪽.
46 김홍제 (2019), 포항지진 재난 거버넌스와 재난 시티즌십 라운드테이블, 포항지진, 그후: 재난 거버넌스와 재난 시티즌십 (포스텍평화연구소 심포지엄, 2019년 11월 8일).
47 모성은 (2019), 포항지진 재난 거버넌스와 재난 시티즌십 라운드테이블, 포항지진, 그후: 재난 거버넌스와 재난 시티즌십 (포스텍평화연구소 심포지엄, 2019년 11월 8일).
48 김희영 (2019. 3. 23), 오경두 육군사관학교 교수 - 지열발전소에 의한 촉발지진 확신 과학적 논리 앞세워 주장, 경북제일신보.
49 대한지질학회 (2017), 포항지진 긴급포럼 프로그램 (한국프레스센터, 2017년 11월 24일)
50 매일경제 (2019. 4. 19), 포항지열발전 주관사 "사이언스 논문발표저자 연구윤리 위반", 매일경제.
51 목정민 (2016. 12. 26), 학계 '경주지진 영향으로 또 다른 지진 발생 가능해' 주장 나와, 경향신문.
52 박효민 (2018), 사회조사로 살펴본 포항지진의 트라우마, 포스텍 융합문명연구소 엮음, 포항지진 1년, 지금도 계속되는 삶의 여진, 1-18쪽, 포스텍 융합문명연구소.
53 백경서 (2019. 2. 11), 자연지진 vs 유발지진지진 이어지는 포항, 원인은?, 중앙일보.
54 연합뉴스 (2019. 10. 8), 9월 포항서 발생한 규모 2.3 지진은 포항지진의 여진, 연합뉴스.
55 사이언스 타임즈 (2018. 9. 14), 경주지진이 포항지진 방아쇠 중 하나, 위험상존, The Science Times.
56 양만재 (2017. 12. 11), 포항지열발전소가 심각한 트라우마다, 한겨레신문.
57 연합뉴스 (2019. 5. 13), 아픔 기억해야죠...포항지진 난 11월 15일을 ' 안전의 날'로, 연합뉴스.
58 원태준 (2018), 수능 응시생과 포항지진, 포스텍 융합문명연구소 엮음, 포항지진 1년, 지금도 계속되는 삶의 여진, 37-47쪽, 포스텍 융합문명연구소.
59 원호섭 (2018. 9. 14), 경주지진이 포항지진 방아쇠 중 하나 - 홍태경 연세대 교수팀 논문발표, '동일본 대지진 후 방출에너지 10배', MK뉴스.
60 유용하 (2017. 11. 24), 포항지진 원인 지열발전으로 보기 어렵다, 서울신문.
61 홍태경 (2019), 포항지진 인터뷰, (연세대학교, 2019년 10월 4일).
62 Zang, A. Oye, V., Jousset, P., Deichmann, N., Gritto, R., McGarr, R., Major, E., & Bruhn, D. (2014), "Analysis of Induced Seismicity in Geothermal Reservoirs - An Overview", Geothermics, Vol. 52, pp. 6-21.   DOI
63 김광희 (2019), 포항지진 인터뷰, (부산대학교, 2019년 11월 1일).
64 이윤수 (2019), 포항지진 인터뷰, (포스텍, 2019년 3월 26일).
65 이근영 (2018. 4. 27), 포항지진은 지열발전 시추 물주입에 의한 유발지진, 한겨레신문.
66 윤지로 (2019. 3. 20), 포항지진은 촉발지진 '극적인 반전'남은 쟁점은?, 세계일보.
67 이광석 (2019), '인류세' 논의를 둘러싼 쟁점과 테크노-생태학적 전망, 문화/과학, 97호, 22-54쪽.
68 이근영 (2017. 12. 4), 지열발전소 포항지진 진범인가, 누명 쓴 마녀인가, 한겨레신문.
69 이승륜 (2017. 11. 17), 지열발전이 뭐길래 - 이진한 교수 vs 윤운상 단장, 지진영향 논란확산, 국제신문.
70 임재현 (2018), 포항지진과 지열발전, 여우와 두루미.
71 임태훈 (2019), 난지도가 인류세에 묻는 것들, 문화/과학, 97호, 119-142쪽.
72 정재훈 (2017. 11. 25) 포항지진, "액상화는 일반적 현상...유발지진 추가조사 필요, 영남일보.
73 조승한 (2019. 3. 20), 포항지진은 촉발지진. 진앙지 깊이 등 남은 쟁점들, 동아사이언스.
74 천권필 (2019. 2. 11), 포항 앞바다 규모 4.1 지진, '2년 전과 달리 후 포단층서 발생', 중앙일보.
75 Hecht, G. (2018. 2. 6), "The African Anthropocene", Aeon.
76 Harwood, J. (1986), "Ludwick Fleck and the Sociology of Knowledge", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 173-187.   DOI
77 Hausler, H. (2018), "Did Anthropogeology Anticipate the Idea of the Anthropocene?", The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 69-86.   DOI
78 Hecht, G. (2012), Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
79 Hecht, G. (2018), "Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality and Violence", Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 109-141.   DOI
80 Holland, A. (2011), Examination of Possibly Induced Seismicity from Hydraulic Fracturing in the Eola Field, Garvin County, Oklahoma (Oklahoma Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF1-2011).
81 Hong, T-K., Lee, J., Park, S., & Kim, W. (2018), "Time-advanced Occurrence of Moderate-size Earthquakes in a Stable Intraplate Region After a Megathrust Earthquake and Their Seismic Properties", Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 13331, pp. 1-8.
82 Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
83 Jensen, C. B. (forthcoming), "Cosmopolitical perplexities: Pragmatic tests for changing climate" (unpublished manuscript).
84 Keranen, K. M., Weingarten, M., Abers, G. A., & Ge, S. (2014), "Sharp Increase in Central Oklahoma Seismicity since 2008 Induced by Massive Wastewater Injection", Science, Vol. 345, No. 6195, pp. 448-451.   DOI
85 행정안전부 (2018), 2017 포항지진 백서, 행정안전부.
86 포항지역사회연구소 (2019), 포항지진은 인재요 관재다, 강호진, 권영락, 김광일, 도형기, 박성진, 이대환, 이동철, 이재섭, 임재현, 임해도, 장태원 엮음, 포항의 눈, 76-130쪽, 여우와 두루미.
87 포항지진 범시민대책본부 (2019. 5. 24), 포항지진 범시민대책본부 카페 밴드, (https://band.us/band/68626866).
88 포항지진 정부조사연구단 (2019), 포항지진과 지열발전의 연관성에 관한 정부조사연구단 요약보고서, 포항지진 정부조사연구단.
89 홍태경 (2016), 거칠고 신선한 단층 잠복, 중대형 지진 위험 상존, 신동아, 686호(2016년 11월 14일호), 162-170쪽.
90 Kim, K-H., Ree, J-H., Kim, Y., Kim, S., Kang, S., & Seo, W. (2018), "Assessing Whether the 2017Mw 5.4 Pohang Earthquake in South Korea Was an Induced Event", Science, Vol. 360, pp. 1007-1009.   DOI
91 홍태경 (2017), 포항지진 이후: 무엇을 해야하나-깊은 땅속 활성단층 찾아내야, 신동아, 700호(2017년 12월 24일호), 238-247쪽.
92 홍태경 (2017. 12. 26), 홍태경의 지구이야기-지열발전소로 인한 유발지진 논란, 서울신문.
93 홍태경 (2019. 4. 16), 홍태경의 지구이야기-유발지진과 촉발지진, 뭐가 다를까, 서울신문.
94 홍태경 (2019. 11. 11), 홍태경의 지구이야기-인류세가 남긴 흔적, 서울신문.
95 환경운동연합 (2018), 지열발전소 탓하다 지진대책 놓쳐버린 당국, 환경운동연합 보도자료(2018년 2월 11일).
96 JTBC뉴스 (2017. 11. 15), 인터뷰: "포항지진, 지열 발전소 건설이 영향 준 것이라 생각".
97 JTBC뉴스 (2017. 11. 16), 인터뷰: 지열발전측 "두 달간 운영중단중...포항지진과 무관".
98 KBS뉴스 (2018. 9. 14), 홍태경 연세대 교수 '포항지진은 동일본 대지진으로 지각 약해져 발생'.
99 YTN 라디오 (2019. 10. 27), 인터뷰: 창녕지진, 경주 포항지진 후 에너지 전달된 것, YTN 라디오 노영희의 출발새아침.
100 Barnes, B., Bloor, D. & Henry, J. (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
101 Barnes, B. & MacKenzie, D. (1979), "On the Role of Interests in Scientific Change", The Sociological Review, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Suppl), pp. 49-66.   DOI
102 Latour, B. (1999b), "For Bloor...and Beyond", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 113-129.   DOI
103 Kim, K-H. (2005), "Styles of Scientific Practice and the Prion Controversy" in Seguin, E. ed., Infectious Processes: Knowledge, Discourse and the Politics of Prions, pp. 38-72, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
104 Kim, K-H. (2007), Social Construction of Disease, London: Routledge.
105 Latour, B. (1999a), Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
106 Latour, B. (2004a), Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107 Latour, B. (2004b), "Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern", Critical Inquiry, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 225-248.   DOI
108 Latour, B. (2004c), "Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics?", Common Knowledge, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 450-462.   DOI
109 Latour, B. (2017), Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime, Cambridge: Polity.
110 Latour, B. (2018), Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime, Cambridge: Polity.
111 Bloor, D. (1999b), "Reply to Bruno Latour", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 131-136.   DOI
112 Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T. J. (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
113 Blok, A. & Jensen, T. E. (2011), Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World, London: Routledge.
114 Lee, K. K., Ellsworth, W. L., Giardini, D., Townend, J., Ge, S., Shimamoto, T., Yeo, I-W. ... & Langenbruch, C. (2019), "Managing Injection-induced Seismic Risks", Science, Vol. 364, No. 6442, pp. 730-732.   DOI
115 Llenos, AL. & Michael, A. J. (2013), "Modeling Earthquake Rate Changes in Oklahoma and Arkansas: Possible Signatures of Induced Seismicity", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 103, No. 5, pp. 2850-2861.   DOI
116 Liu, S., Xu, L., & Talwani, P. (2011), "Reservoir-induced Seismicity in the Danjiankou Reservoir: A Quantitative Analysis", Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 185, pp. 514-528.   DOI
117 Blok, A. & Jensen, C. B. (2019), "The Anthropocene Event in Social Theory: On Ways of Problematizing Nonhuman Materiality Differently", The Sociological Review, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 1-17.
118 Bloor, D. (1999a), "Anti-Latour", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 81-112.   DOI
119 Bonneuil, C. & Fressoz, J-B. (2017), The Shock of the Anthropocene, London: Verso.
120 Bruhn, D., Huenges, E., Agustsson, K., Zang, A., Kwiatek, G. Rachez, X., Wiemer, S. ... & Oye, V. (2011), "Geothermal Engineering Integrating Mitigation of Induced Seismicity in Reservoirs - The European GEISER Project", GRC Transactions, Vol. 35, pp. 1623-1626.
121 Callon, M. (1984), "Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay", The Sociological Review, Vol. 32, pp. 196-233.   DOI
122 Certini, G. & Scalenghe, R. (2014), "Is the Anthropocene Really Worthy of a Formal Geoploic Definition?", The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 77-80.   DOI
123 Clarke, B. (2017), "Rethinking Gaia: Stengers, Latour, Margulis", Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 3-26.   DOI
124 Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000), "The 'Anthropocene'", IGBP Newsletter, Vol. 41, pp. 17-18.
125 Margulis, L. & Lovelock, J. (1975), "The Atmosphere as Circulatory System of the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis", CoEvolution Quarterly, Vol. 5, pp. 31-40.
126 Luisetti, F. (2016), "Demons of the Anthropocene: Facing Bruno Latour's Gaia", Philosophy Kitchen, Vol. 5, September 2016, pp. 156-169.
127 Luisetti, F. (2018), "Geopower: On the States of Nature of Late Capitalism", European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 1-22.
128 Malm, A. & Horborg, A. (2014), "The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative", Anthropocene Review, Vol. 1, pp. 62-69.   DOI
129 Meybeck, M. (2003), "Global Analysis of River Systems: From Earth System Controls to Anthropocene Syndromes", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Vol. 358, No. 1440, pp. 1935-1955.   DOI
130 Dura-Gomez, I. & Talwani, P. (2010), "Reservoir-induced Seismicity Associated with the Itoiz Reservoir, Spain: A Case Study", Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 181, pp. 343-356.   DOI
131 El Hariri, M., Aberscrobie, R. E., Rowe, C. A., & Do Nascimento, A. F. (2010), "The Role of Fluids in Triggering Earthquakes: Observations from Reservoir Induced Seismicity in Brazil", Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 181, pp. 1566-1574.   DOI
132 Fleck, L. (1979[1935]), Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
133 Gibbard P. L. & Walker, M. J. C. (2014), "The Term 'Anthropocene' in the Context of Formal Geological Classification", Geological Society, London, Vol. 395, No. 1, pp. 29-37.   DOI
134 Goudie, A. S. & Viles, H. A. (2016), Geomorphology in the Anthropocene, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135 Grigoli, F. & Wiemer, S. (2017. 6. 9), "The Challenges Posed by Induced Seismicity", EOS.
136 Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Priolo, E., Rinaldi, A.P., Clinton, J.F., Stabile, T.A., Dost, B. ... & Dahm, T. (2017), "Current Challenges in Monitoring, Discrimination, and Management of Induced Seismicity Related to Underground Industrial Activities: A European Perspective", Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 310-340.   DOI
137 Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A.P., Manconi, A., Lopez-Comino, J.A., Clinton, J.F., Westaway, R. ... & Wiemer, S. (2018), "The November 2017 Mw5.5 Pohang Earthquake: A Possible Case of Induced Seismicity in South Korea", Science, Vol. 360 (1 June 2018), pp. 1003-1006.   DOI
138 Guha. S. K. (2000), Induced Earthquakes, Dordrecht: Kluwer.