Browse > Article

Comparison of Soft Tissue Changes between Adolescents and Adults in Class II Malocclusion Treatment  

Chang, Na-Young (Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Cho, Jin-Hyoung (Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Lee, You-Mee (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Kang, Kyung-Hwa (Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain / v.34, no.3, 2009 , pp. 277-294 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the soft tissue changes of class II adolescents and adults in respect to extraction or nonextraction. The study included 68 patients from Wonkwang Dental Hospital were categorized to adolescent extraction group, adolescent nonextraction group, adult extraction group, adult nonextraction group. Cephalometric tracing of each patient was done to compare pretreatment and posttreatment of each group, to compare the changes between groups. And among the variables that showed significancy, correlation analysis and simple linear regression were done. The results were as follows. 1. In both adolescents and adults after extraction treatment, nasolabial angle significantly increased and in both subjects after non extraction treatment, nasolabial angle significantly decreased. 2. In extraction subjects, there were positive correlation between the amount of treatment changes of vertical-U1 and E line-upper lip, the changes of vertical-L1 and E line-lower lip, the changes of vertical-L1 and vertical-Li. 3. In extraction subjects, simple regression equations of E line-upper lip, E line-lower lip, Li were calculated by regression analysis. According to the results above, it could be considered that the effect of the extraction or nonextraction treatment was greater than the effect of growth.
Keywords
Class II; Adolescent; Adult; Soft tissue change;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Tweed CH. Indication for extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod 1944;30:405-428
2 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in 'borderline' class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:1-14   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Profitt WR, White RP, Sarver DM. Contemporary treatment of Dentofacial Deformity. 2003, Mosby
4 Rudee DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1964;50:421-434   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ridel RA. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1950;20:168-178   PUBMED
6 Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957;43:14-34
7 Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
8 Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990;60:177-90   PUBMED
9 Angelle PL. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1973;267-80
10 Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1959;45:481-507   DOI
11 Anderson JP, Joondeph DR, Turpin DL. A cephalometric study of profile changes in orthodontically treated cases ten years out of retention. Angle orthod 1973;43:324-36   PUBMED
12 Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:28-37   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, Division 1 malocclusions: A comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:129-35   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:67-72   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hillesund E, Fjeld D, Zachrisson BU. Reliability of soft-tissue profile in cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1978;74:537-50   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1959;45:481-507   DOI
17 Choi JH, Lee JW, Cha KS. Soft tissue profile change prediction in maxillary incisor retraction based on cephalometrics. Korea J Orthod 1997;27:65-78
18 Janson G, Fuziy A, Freitas MR, Henriques JFC, Almeida RR. Soft-tissue treatment changes in class II division 1 malocclsion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:729.e1-729.e8   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Dahlberg S. Statistical methods for medial and biological students. New York, 1940, Interscience
20 Koch R, Gonzales A, Witt E. Profile and soft tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1979;1:193-9   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Oliver BM. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982;82:141-9   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, Maxwell R. The decision to extract: Part II Analysis of clinicians' stated reasons for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:393-402   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Ha JK, Cha KS. A cephalometric study on the softtissue profile changes following the incisor retraction. Korea J Orthod 1994;24(3):547-554
24 Bloom LA. Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1961; 47:371   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Lee SH. Variation of soft tissue profile in adults with treated normal occlusion. 2002; Wonkwang Univ. 20. Jin HK, Moon YS. A study on soft tissue facial profile changes In orthodontic treatment with four premolar extractions. Korea J Orthod 1998;28:1-15
26 Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Am J Orthod 1960;46:647-73   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968;54:272-89   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Lai J, Ghoush J, Nanda RS. Effects of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118: 505-13   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Mamandras AH. Linear changes of the maxillary and mandibular lips. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:405-10   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Yu HS, Baik HS. A comparative study of pre-and posttreatment cephalometric measurements: extraction vs. non-extravtion groups of class I malocclusion. Korea J Orthod 1997;27:761-770
31 Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajenz TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:324-31   DOI   ScienceOn