Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2018.18.6.595

Probability-based Critical Path Estimation for PERT Networks of Repetitive Activities  

Yi, Kyoo-Jin (Department of Civil, Safety, and Environmental Engineering, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction / v.18, no.6, 2018 , pp. 595-602 More about this Journal
Abstract
Network-based scheduling methods can be classified into CPM method and PERT method. In the network scheduling chart, critical path can be estimated by performing the forward calculation and the backward calculation though the paths in the network chart. In PERT method, however, it is unreasonable to simply estimate the critical path by adding the sum of the activity durations in a specific path, since it does not incorporate probabilistic concept of PERT. The critical path of a PERT network can change according to the target period and deviation, and in some cases, the expected time of the critical path may not be the path with longest expected time. Based on this concept, this study proposes a technique to derive the most-likely critical path by comparing the sum of estimated time with the target time. It also proposes a method of systematically deriving all alternate paths for a network of repetitive activities. Case studies demonstrated that the most-likely critical path is not a fixed path and may vary according to the target period and standard deviation. It is expected that the proposed method of project duration forecasting will be useful in construction environment with varying target date situations.
Keywords
PERT; network; scheduling; critical path; repetitive project;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 O'Brien JJ. Scheduling handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1969. p. 8-72.
2 Cottrell WD. Simplified program evaluation and review technique(PERT). Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1999 Jan;125(1):16-22.   DOI
3 Pontrandolfo P. Project duration in stochastic networks by the PERT-path technique. International Journal of Project Management. 2000 Jun;18(3):215-22.   DOI
4 Lu M, AbouRizk SM. Simplified CPM/PERT simulation model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2000 Mar;126(3):219-26.   DOI
5 Abbasi GY, Mukattash AM. Crashing PERT networks using mathematical programming. International Journal of Project Management. 2001 Apr;19(3):181-8.   DOI
6 Wei CC, Liub PH, Tsaic YC. Resource-constrained project management using enhanced theory of constraint. International Journal of Project Management. 2002 Oct;20(7):561-7.   DOI
7 Gladysz B, Skorupka D, Kuchta D, Duchaczek A. Project risk time management - a proposed model and a case study in the construction industry. Computer Science. 2015 Aug;64:24-31.
8 Zhong DH, Zhang JS. New method for calculating path float in program evaluation and review technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2003 May;129(5):501-6.   DOI
9 Castro J, Gomez D, Tejada J. A project game for PERT networks. Operations Research Letters. 2007 Nov;35(6):791-8.   DOI
10 Hajdu H, Bokor O. The effects of different activity distributions on project duration in PERT networks. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014 Mar;119:766-75.
11 Azaron A, Katagiri H, Sakawa M, Kato K, Memariani A. A multi-objective resource allocation problem in PERT networks. European Journal of Operational Research. 2006 Aug;172(3):838-54.   DOI
12 Azaron A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. Multi-objective time-cost trade-off in dynamic PERT networks using an interactive approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 2007 Aug;180(3):1186-200.   DOI