Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2012.12.1.042

Analysis on Legal Issue of Lawsuits and Subjective Judgment on Defects in Apartment Building  

Park, Jun-Mo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
Seo, Deok-Seok (School of Architecture, Halla University)
Choi, Jeong-Hyun (Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd)
Kim, Ok-Kyue (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
Park, Kang-Woo (College of Law, Chungbuk National University)
Jo, Jae-Hun (Division of Architecture, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction / v.12, no.1, 2012 , pp. 42-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
Lawsuits related to defects in apartment buildings involve a range of legal issues, based on which the current subjective judgment system has been established. This study aims to organize the judgment system by stage of lawsuit from a legal perspective by reviewing the factors dealt with in precedent research. The main issues at hand include assignment of obligation, the day on which the computation of exclusion period begins and the day on which the defect repair is completed. The rationality of the current subjective judgment system could be determined by reviewing the recent cases. Based on the findings of the review, the following are suggestions for improvements and complements of the system. First, the process of assignment of obligation should be systemized, and the guarantee insurance system that provides a warranty deed should be improved as well. In addition, improvements and systemization should be made to clarify the responsibilities for any defect arising from the agreements that are not stipulated on the contract, computation of abatement rate of compensation and the system by which the responsibility for the defects is completed when residents acquire ownership from rental status.
Keywords
lawsuit on defect; legal issue; subjective judgment; assignment of chose in action; starting point of disqualified day;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Suwon district court. Case-No.2010가합1780. Korea, Suwon district court; 2011.6.28. Korean.
2 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2010가합4498. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.6.22. Korean.
3 Suwon district court. Case-No.2010가합4499. Korea, Suwon district court; 2011.6.30. Korean.
4 Seoul high court. Case-No.2009나74047. Korea, Seoul high court; 2010.6.4. Korean.
5 Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support. [Law of perform a guaranty for a house by cartoon]. Tokyo (Japan): Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support; 2010. 18 p. Japanese.
6 Supreme court. Case-No.2004다35625. Korea, Seoul :Supreme court; 2004.1.27. Korean.
7 Suwon district court. Case-No.2009가합3574. Korea, Suwon :Suwon district court; 2010.4.30. Korean.
8 Seoul hign court. Case-No.2006나91935. Korea, Seoul :Seoul hign court; 2008.12.9. Korean.
9 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2007가합71863. Korea, Seoul :Seoul central district court; 2009.4.29. Korean.
10 Supreme court. Case-No.2008다48490. Korea, Seoul :Supreme court; 2008.12.24. Korean.
11 Seoul south district court. Case-No.2009가합26528. Korea, Seoul south district court; 2011.6.28. Korean.
12 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합111321. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2010.6.15. Korean.
13 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2010가합120185. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.7.6. Korean.
14 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2007가합81396. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2010.1.13. Korean.
15 Uijeongbu district court. Case-No.2008가합5691. Korea, Uijeongbu district court; 2010.2.17. Korean.
16 Suwon district court. Case-No.2008가합20600. Korea, Suwon district court; 2011.4.21. Korean.
17 Cheongju district court. Case-No.2009가합2238. Korea, Cheongju district court; 2011.6.15. Korean.
18 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합19913. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2010.4.29. Korean.
19 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합65862. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.1.12. Korean.
20 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합125221. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.6.3. Korean.
21 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합132915. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.6.8. Korean.
22 Seoul central district court. Case-No.2009가합148316. Korea, Seoul central district court; 2011.6.23. Korean.
23 Kang YM, Kim BS, Park JM, Choi JH, Seo DS, Kim OK. Regression analysis on the dispute cost property in apartment housing claims. Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2010 May 14; Seoul, Korea. Seoul (Korea): the Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2010. p. 225-8.
24 Pak JM, Kim OK, Kim JL. Revitalization of the Concillation System for Defect Disputes Related to Apartment Buildings. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2011 Jun;11(3):208-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Choi JH, Park JM, Seo DS, Jo JH, Park KW, Kim OK. A study on legal issues about defect repair claim on apartment building. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction. 2009 Oct;25(11):147-53.
26 Seo DS, Um SK. A Study on type and Problems of defect Lawsuit on Apartment Buildings. Journal of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. 2007 Dec;7(6):127-32.
27 Yoon HI. An Empirical Study on the Problems and Improvement Methods of the Disputes over Defects in Apartment Houses [dissertation]. Suwon (Korea): Kyonggi University; 2008. 146 p.
28 Supreme court. Case-No.2001다24891. Korea, Seoul :Supreme court; 2004.1.27. Korean.
29 Supreme court. Case-No.2003다7616. Korea, Seoul :Supreme court; 2004.4.9. Korean.
30 Constitutional court. Case-No.2005헌가16. Korea, Seoul :Constitutional court; 2008.7.31. Korean.