Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2012.35.1.009

Isolation and identification of infectious bursal disease virus from broiler and layer chickens during the outbreak year 2007 in Bangladesh  

Islam, Md. Taohidul (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Mohiuddin, Mohammad (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Hossain, Muhammad Tofazzal (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Rahman, Md. Bahanur (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Rahman, Md. Mostafizur (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Rahman, Md. Siddiqur (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Song, Hee-Jong (Korea Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University)
Islam, Md. Alimul (Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.35, no.1, 2012 , pp. 9-17 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to isolate and identify infectious bursal disease viruses (IBDVs) from broiler and layer chickens of outbreaks of infectious bursal disease (IBD) in three districts of Bangladesh. A total of 70 bursal samples were collected from dead broiler (n=40) and layer (n=30) chickens showing specific lesions of IBD from seven commercial poultry farms of three different districts (Mymensingh, Chittagong and Tangail) of Bangladesh during the year 2007. Five representative bursal samples from each farm were used for the isolation of IBDVs using 9-day-old embryonated eggs of seronegative flock of layer birds and for identification the samples were subjected to agar gel immunodiffusion test (AGIDT), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Out of 35 bursal samples, IBDVs were successfully isolated from 28 (80%) samples. By AGIDT, 32 (91.4%) samples were found positive for IBDV antigen. Results of AGIDT clearly indicated that IBDVs detected in 29 bursal samples of six affected farms were identical to each other but not to IBDVs present in the remaining three samples of another farm. Indirect immunoperoxidase staining of the bursal sections revealed the presence of IBDV antigen in 32 (91.4%) samples and the IBDV antigen was detected mainly in the cortex of the lymphoid follicles of the bursal tissues. In histopathology, cell depletion, atrophy and necrosis were observed in many bursal follicles with severe edema of interfollicular septa. Of the 35 bursal samples, 34 (97.1%) samples generated 254 bp product by RT-PCR. In conclusion, the results of virus isolation and identification by AGIDT, IHC and the analysis of viral genome by RT-PCR confirmed the outbreaks of acute IBD in commercial poultry of Bangladesh. Moreover, histopathological findings and results of AGIDT gave a clear indication that the isolates from six outbreaks were different from classical strain and it seems to be of very virulent strain. On the other hand, the isolates from the other outbreak were similar to the classical strain.
Keywords
Infectious bursal disease virus; Isolation; Immunohistochemistry; RT-PCR;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Spies U, Müller H, Becht H. 1987. Properties of RNA polymerase activity associated with infectious bursal disease virus and characterization of its reaction products. Virus Res 8: 127-140.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tanimura N, Tsukamoto K, Nakamura K, Narita M, Maeda M. 1995. Association between pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus and viral antigen distribution detected by immunohistochemistry. Avian Dis 39: 9-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Van den Berg TP, Gonze M, Meulemans G. 1991. Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: Isolation and characterization of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathol 20: 133-143.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wood GW, Muskett JC, Herbert CN, Thornton DH. 1979. Standardization of the quantitative agar gel precipitation test for antibodies to infectious bursal disease. J Biol Stand 7: 89-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wu CC, Lin TL, Zhang HG, Davis VS, Boyle JA. 1992. Molecular detection of infectious bursal disease virus by polymerase chain reaction. Avian Dis 36: 221-226.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Leong JC, Brown D, Dobos P, Kibenge F, Ludert JE, Müller H, Mundt E, Nicholoson B. 2000. Birnaviridae. pp. 481-490. In: van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB(ed.). Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press, San Diego, Califonia.
7 Luna LG. 1968. Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. pp. 121-123. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York.
8 Muller H, Islam MR, Raue R. 2003. Research on infectious bursal disease - the past, the present and the future. Vet Microbiol 97: 153-165.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Müller R, Käufer I, Reinacher M, Weiss E. 1979. Immunofluorescent studies of early virus propagation after oral infection with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 26: 345-352.
10 Nachimuthu K, Raj GD, Thangavelu A, Venkatesan RA. 1995. Reverse passive haemagglutination test in the diagnosis of infectious bursal disease. Trop Anim Health Prod 27: 43-46.   DOI
11 Rahman MM, Hossain WIMA, Rahman MM, Miah AH, Biswas MHR. 1996. Isolation and identification of infectious bursal disease virus in chickens in Bangladesh. Bangl Vet J 30: 7-11.
12 Riddell C. 1987. Avian Histopathology. pp. 1-17. American Association of Avian Pathologists. Kennett Square, Pennsylvania.
13 Rosales AG, Villegas P, Lukert PD, Fletcher OJ, Mohamed MA, Brown J. 1989. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of two field strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis 33: 35-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Sharma JM, Dohms JE, Metz AL. 1989. Comparative pathogenesis of serotype 1 and variant serotype 1 isolates of infectious bursal disease virus and their effect on humoral and cellular immune competence of specific-pathogen-free chickens. Avian Dis 33: 112-124.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jackwood DJ, Saif YM. 1987. Antigenic diversity of infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Dis 31: 766-770.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Islam MT, Samad MA. 2003. Outbreaks of infectious bursal disease in vaccinated and unvaccinated commercial cockerel farms in Bangladesh. Bangl J Vet Med 1: 21-24.
17 Islam MT, Islam MA, Samad MA. 2005. Immunosuppressive effect of infectious bursal disease virus and vaccine on humoral immune response of broiler chickens to Newcastle disease vaccination. Progress Agric 16: 71-75.
18 Jackwood DJ, Saif YM, Moorhead PD. 1985. Immunogenicity and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II in chickens. Avian Dis 29: 1184-1194.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jackwood DJ, Sommer-Wagner SE. 2005. Molecular epidemiology of infectious bursal disease viruses: distribution and genetic analysis of newly emerging viruses in the United States. Avian Dis 49: 220-226.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Jonsson LG, Engstrom BE. 1986. Immunohistochemical detection of infectious bursal disease and infectious bronchitis viral antigens in fixed, paraffin-embedded chicken tissues. Avian Pathol 15: 385-393.   DOI
21 Kabell S, Handberg KJ, Li Y, Kusk M, Bisgaard M. 2005. Detection of vvIBDV in vaccinated SPF chickens. Acta Vet Scand 46: 219-227.   DOI
22 Kadam M, Jhala MK. 2003. Comparison of serological tests for detection of infectious bursal disease virus in bursal samples. Indian Vet J 80: 723-726.
23 Kusk M, Kebell S, Jorgensen PH, Handberg KJ. 2005. Differentiation of five strains of infectious bursal disease virus: development of a strain specific multiplex PCR. Vet Microbiol 109: 159-167.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Hassan MK, Al-Natour MQ, Ward LA, Saif YM. 1996. Pathogenicity, attenuation, and immunogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis 40: 567-571.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Abdel-Alim GA, Saif YM. 2001. Immunogenicity and antigenicity of very virulent strains of infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Dis 45: 92-101.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Chettle N, Stuart JC, Wyeth PJ. 1989. Outbreak of virulent infectious bursal disease in East Anglia. Vet Rec 125: 271-272.   DOI
27 Cruz-Coy JS, Giambrone JJ, Hoerr FJ. 1993. Immunohistochemical detection of infectious bursal disease virus in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded chicken tissues using monoclonal antibody. Avian Dis 37: 577-581.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Hudson PJ, McKern NM, Power BE, Azad AA. 1986. Genomic structure of the large RNA segment of infectious bursal disease virus. Nucl Acids Res 14: 5001-5012.   DOI
29 Ikuta N, El-Attrache J, Villegas P, García EM, Lunge VR, Fonseca AS, Oliveira C, Marques EK. 2001. Molecular characterization of Brazilian infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Dis 45: 297-306.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Islam MR, Zierenberg K, Eterradossi N, Toquin D, Rivallan G, Müller H. 2001. Molecular and antigenic characterization of Bangladeshi isolates of infectious bursal disease virus demonstrates their similarities with recent European, Asian and African very virulent strains. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 48: 211-221.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Faragher JT, Allan WH, Wyeth PJ. 1974. Immunosuppressive effect of infectious bursal agent in vaccination against Newcastle disease. Vet Rec 95: 385-388.   DOI