Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.29220/CSAM.2022.29.2.239

A Bayesian joint model for continuous and zero-inflated count data in developmental toxicity studies  

Hwang, Beom Seuk (Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.29, no.2, 2022 , pp. 239-250 More about this Journal
Abstract
In many applications, we frequently encounter correlated multiple outcomes measured on the same subject. Joint modeling of such multiple outcomes can improve efficiency of inference compared to independent modeling. For instance, in developmental toxicity studies, fetal weight and number of malformed pups are measured on the pregnant dams exposed to different levels of a toxic substance, in which the association between such outcomes should be taken into account in the model. The number of malformations may possibly have many zeros, which should be analyzed via zero-inflated count models. Motivated by applications in developmental toxicity studies, we propose a Bayesian joint modeling framework for continuous and count outcomes with excess zeros. In our model, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression model would be used to describe count data, and a subject-specific random effects would account for the correlation across the two outcomes. We implement a Bayesian approach using MCMC procedure with data augmentation method and adaptive rejection sampling. We apply our proposed model to dose-response analysis in a developmental toxicity study to estimate the benchmark dose in a risk assessment.
Keywords
Bayesian inference; benchmark dose; data augmentation method; Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); zero-inflated Poisson regression model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ghosh SK, Mukhopadhyay P, and Lu J-C (2006). Bayesian analysis of zero-inflated regression models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136, 1360-1375.   DOI
2 Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, et al. (2017). Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment, European Food Safety Authority Journal, 15, 1-41.
3 Jensen SM, Kluxen FM, and Ritz C (2019). A review of recent advances in benchmark dose methodology, Risk Analysis, 39, 2295-2315.   DOI
4 Lambert D (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing, Technometrics, 34, 1-14.   DOI
5 McCulloch C (2008). Joint modelling of mixed outcome types using latent variables, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17, 53-73.   DOI
6 Catalano PJ and Ryan LM (1992). Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 651-658.   DOI
7 Dunson DB (2000). Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 62, 355-366.   DOI
8 Chip S and Greenberg E (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, The American Statistician, 49, 327-335.   DOI
9 Crump KS (1995). Calculation of benchmark doses from continuous data, Risk Analysis, 15, 79-89.   DOI
10 Dagne GA (2004). Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of correlated zero-inflated count data, Biometrical Journal, 46, 653-663.   DOI
11 Celeux G, Forbes F, Robert CP, and Titterington DM (2006). Deviance information criterion for missing data models, Bayesian Analysis, 1, 651-674.   DOI
12 Fronczyk K and Kottas A (2017). Risk assessment for toxicity experiments with discrete and continuous outcomes: A Bayesian nonparametric approach, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 22, 585-601.   DOI
13 Lee K, Joo Y, Song JJ, and Harper DW (2011). Analysis of zero-inflated clustered count data: A marginalized model approach, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55, 824-837.   DOI
14 Neelon BH, O'Malley AJ, and Normand SLT (2010). A Bayesian model for repeated measures zeroinflated count data with application to outpatient psychiatric service use, Statistical Modelling, 10, 421-439.   DOI
15 Rodrigues J (2003). Bayesian analysis of zero-inflated distributions, Communications in Statistics- Theory and Methods, 32, 281-289.   DOI
16 Dunson DB, Chen Z, and Harry JA (2003). A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes, Biometrics, 59, 521-530.   DOI
17 Dunson DB and Herring AH (2005). Bayesian latent variable models for mixed discrete outcomes, Biostatistics, 6, 11-25.   DOI
18 Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, and Rubin DB (2014). Bayesian Data Analysis, CRC Press, New York.
19 Gilks WR and Wild P (1992). Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 41, 337-348.
20 Hall DB (2000). Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: A case study, Biometrics, 56, 1030-1039.   DOI
21 Hwang BS and Pennell ML (2018). Semiparametric Bayesian joint modeling of clustered binary and continuous outcomes with informative cluster size in developmental toxicity assessment, Environmetrics, 29, 1-15.
22 Jensen SM, Kluxen FM, Streibig JC, Cedergreen N, and Ritz C (2020). bmd: an R package for benchmark dose estimation, Peer J, 8, 1-25.
23 KassahunW, Neyens T, Molenberghs G, Faes C, and Verbeke G (2015). A joint model for hierarchical continuous and zero-inflated overdispersed count data, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85, 552-571.   DOI
24 Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, and Van Der Linde A (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64, 583-639.   DOI
25 Liu H and Powers DA (2007). Growth curve models for zero-inflated count data: an application to smoking behavior, Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 247-279.   DOI
26 Min Y and Agresti A (2005). Random effect models for repeated measures of zero-inflated count data, Statistical Modeling, 5, 1-19.   DOI
27 US Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance, OECD, Washington, D.C.
28 Mullahy J (1986). Specification and testing of some modified count data models, Journal of Econometrics, 33, 341-365.   DOI
29 R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
30 Regan, MM and Catalano PJ (1999). Likelihood models for clustered binary and continuous outcomes: application to developmental toxicology, Biometrics, 55, 760-768.   DOI
31 Yau KK and Lee AH (2001). Zero-inflated Poisson regression with random effects to evaluate an occupational injury prevention programme, Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2907-2920.   DOI
32 Hwang BS and Pennell ML (2014). Semiparametric Bayesian joint modeling of a binary and continuous outcome with applications in toxicological risk assessment, Statistics in Medicine, 33, 1162-1175.   DOI
33 Neelon BH (2019). Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial regression based on Polya-Gamma mixtures, Bayesian Analysis, 14, 829-855.   DOI