Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2009.16.1.195

Multi-Optimal Designs for Second-Order Response Surface Models  

Park, You-Jin (Dept. of Business Administration, Chung-Ang Univ.)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.16, no.1, 2009 , pp. 195-208 More about this Journal
Abstract
A conventional single design optimality criterion has been used to select an efficient experimental design. But, since an experimental design is constructed with respect to an optimality criterion pre specified by investigators, an experimental design obtained from one optimality criterion which is superior to other designs may perform poorly when the design is evaluated by another optimality criterion. In other words, none of these is entirely satisfactory and even there is no guarantee that a design which is constructed from using a certain design optimality criterion is also optimal to the other design optimality criteria. Thus, it is necessary to develop certain special types of experimental designs that satisfy multiple design optimality criteria simultaneously because these multi-optimal designs (MODs) reflect the needs of the experimenters more adequately. In this article, we present a heuristic approach to construct second-order response surface designs which are more flexible and potentially very useful than the designs generated from a single design optimality criterion in many real experimental situations when several competing design optimality criteria are of interest. In this paper, over cuboidal design region for $3\;{\leq}\;k\;{\leq}\;5$ variables, we construct multi-optimal designs (MODs) that might moderately satisfy two famous alphabetic design optimality criteria, G- and IV-optimality criteria using a GA which considers a certain amount of randomness. The minimum, average and maximum scaled prediction variances for the generated response surface designs are provided. Based on the average and maximum scaled prediction variances for k = 3, 4 and 5 design variables, the MODs from a genetic algorithm (GA) have better statistical property than does the theoretically optimal designs and the MODs are more flexible and useful than single-criterion optimal designs.
Keywords
Multi-optimal designs; G-efficient design; IV-efficient design; genetic algorithms; cuboidal regions;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Welch, W. J. (1982). Branch and bound search for experimental designs based on D-optimality and other criteria, Technomerrics, 1, 41-48   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Wynn, H. P. (1970). The sequential generation of D-optimum experimental designs, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 1655-1664   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Meyer, R. K. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1995). The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs, Technometrics, 37, 60-67   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Mitchell, T. J. (1974). An algorithm for the construction of D-optimal experimental designs, Techno-metrics, 16, 203-210   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mitchell, T. J. and Bayne, C. K. (1978). D-optimal fractions of three-level factorial designs, Techno-metrics, 20, 369-380   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Montepiedra, G., Myers, D. and Yeh, A. B. (1998). Application of genetic algorithms to the construc-tion of exact D-optimal designs, Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 817-826   DOI
7 Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York
8 Park, Y. J., Richardson, D. E., Montgomery, D. C., OzoI-Godfrey, A., Borror, C. M. and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2005). Prediction variance properties of second-order designs for cuboidal regions, Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 253-266
9 Myers, R. H., Vining, G. G., Giovannitti-Jensen, A. and Myers, S. L. (1992). Variance dispersion properties of second order response surface designs, Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 1-11
10 Notz, W. (1982). Minimal point second order designs, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 6, 47-58   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Stigler, S. M. (1971). Optimal experimental design for polynomial regression, Journal of the Ameri-can Statistical Association, 66, 311-318   DOI   ScienceOn
12 St. John, R. C. and Draper, N. R. (1975). D-optimality for regression designs: A review, Technometrics, 17, 15-23   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hoke, A. T. (1974). EconomicaI second-order designs based on irregular fractions of the factorial, Technometrics, 16, 375-384   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Huang, Y. C. and Wong, W. K. (1998). Sequential construction of multiple-objective optimal designs, Biometrics, 54, 1388-1397   DOI   ScienceOn
15 JMP Software (2004). Version JMP 5.2. Cary, NC
16 Karlin, S. and Studden, W. J. (1966). Optimal experimental designs, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 783-815   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kiefer. J. (1959). Optimum experimental designs, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 272-319
18 Kiefer, J. (1961). Optimum designs in regression problems, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 298-325   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Lauter, E. (1974). Experimental planning in a class of models, Mathematische Operarionsforsh und Statistics, 5, 673-708
20 Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. (1959). Optimum designs in regression problems, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 271-294   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Lauter, E. (1976). Optimal multipurpose designs for regression models, Mathematische Operations-forsh und Statistics, 7, 51-68   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lee, C. M. S. (1988). Constrained optimal designs, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 18 377-389   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Lucas. J. M. (1974). Optimum composite designs, Technometrics, 16, 561-567   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Lucas, J. M. (1976). Which response surface is best, Technometrics, 18, 411-417   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1980). A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs, Technometrics, 3, 315-324   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1982). Model robust, linear-optimal designs, Technometrics, 24, 49-54   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Cook, R. D. and Wong, W. K. (1994). On the equivalence of constrained and compound optimal designs, Journal of American Statistical Association, 89, 687-692   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Evans, G. W. (1984). An overview of techniques for solving multi-objective mathematical programs, Management Science, 30, 1268-1282   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Fedorov, V. V. (1972). Theory of Optimal Experiments, Academic Press, New York
30 Forrest, S. (1993). Genetic algorithms: Principles of natural selection applied to computation, Science, 261, 872-878   DOI
31 Haines, L. M. (1987). The application of the annealing algorithm to the construction of exact optimal designs for linear regression models, Technometrics, 37, 439-447   DOI
32 Hamada, M., Martz, H. F., Reese, C. S. and Wilson, A. G. (2001). Finding near-optimal Bayesian experimental designs via genetic algorithms, The American Statistician, 55, 175-181   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hartley, H. O. (1959). Smallest composite designs for quadratic response surfaces, Biometric, 15, 611-624   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Heredia-Langner, A., Carlyle, W. M., Montgomery, D. C., Borror, C. M. and Runger, G. C. (2003). genetic algorithm for the construction of D-optimal designs, Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 28-46
35 Borkowski, J. J. (1995a). Finding maximum G-criterion values for central composite designs on the hypercube, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 24, 2041-2058   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Borkowski, J. J. (1995b). Minimum, maximum, and average spherical prediction variances for central composite and Box-Behnken Designs, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 24, 2581-2600   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Borkowski, J. J. (1995c). Spherical prediction-variance properties of central composite and Box-Behnken designs, Technometrics, 37, 399-410   DOI
38 Borkowski, J. J. (2003). Using a generic algorithm to generate small exact response surface designs, Journal of Probability and Statistical Science, 1, 65-88
39 Box, G. E. P. and Behnken, D. W. (1960). Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables, Technometrics, 30, 1-40   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Borkowski, J. J. and Valeroso, E. S. (2001). Comparison of design optimality criteria of reduced models for response surface designs in the hypercube, Technometrics, 43, 468-477   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New York
42 Box, G.E.P. and Wilson, K.B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 1-45
43 Clyde, M. and Chaloner, K. (1996). The equivalence of constrained and weighted designs in multiple objective designs problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1236-1244   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Atwood, C. L. (1969). Optimal and efficient designs of experiments, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 1570-1602   DOI   ScienceOn