Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1179

Size-Specific Dose Estimation In the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project: Does a 32-cm Diameter Phantom Represent a Standard-Sized Patient in Korean Population?  

Kim, Eun Young (Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center)
Kim, Tae Jung (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Goo, Jin Mo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Hyae Young (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center)
Lee, Ji Won (Department of Radiology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Lee, Soojung (Department of Radiology, Chungbuk National University Hospital)
Lim, Jun-tae (Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center)
Kim, Yeol (Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.19, no.6, 2018 , pp. 1179-1186 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to evaluate size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) of low-dose CT (LDCT) in the Korean Lung Cancer Screening (K-LUCAS) project and to determine whether CT protocols from Western countries are appropriate for lung cancer screening in Korea. Materials and Methods: For participants (n = 256, four institutions) of K-LUCAS pilot study, volume CT dose index ($CTDI_{vol}$) using a 32-cm diameter reference phantom was compared with SSDE, which was recalculated from $CTDI_{vol}$ using size-dependent conversion factor (f-size) based on the body size, as described in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204. This comparison was subsequently assessed by body mass index (BMI) levels (underweight/normal vs. overweight/obese), and automatic exposure control (AEC) adaptation (yes/no). Results: Size-specific dose estimate was higher than $CTDI_{vol}$ ($2.22{\pm}0.75mGy$ vs. $1.67{\pm}0.60mGy$, p < 0.001), since the f-size was larger than 1.0 for all participants. The ratio of SSDE to $CTDI_{vol}$ was higher in lower BMI groups; 1.26, 1.37, 1.43, and 1.53 in the obese (n = 103), overweight (n = 70), normal (n = 75), and underweight (n = 4), respectively. The ratio of SSDE to $CTDI_{vol}$ was greater in standard-sized participants than in large-sized participants independent of AEC adaptation; with AEC, SSDE/$CTDI_{vol}$ in large- vs. standard-sized participants: $1.30{\pm}0.08$ vs. $1.44{\pm}0.08$ (p < 0.001) and without AEC, $1.32{\pm}0.08$ vs. $1.42{\pm}0.06$ (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Volume CT dose index based on a reference phantom underestimates radiation exposure of LDCT in standard-sized Korean participants. The optimal radiation dose limit needs to be verified for standard-sized Korean participants.
Keywords
Low-dose CT; Radiation dose; Radiation dosage; Early detection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1342-1346   DOI
2 Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005;237:213-223   DOI
3 Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology 2012;265:841-847   DOI
4 WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-163   DOI
5 Kramer BS, Berg CD, Aberle DR, Prorok PC. Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). J Med Screen 2011;18:109-111   DOI
6 Lee JW, Kim HY, Goo JM, Kim EY, Lee SJ, Kim TJ, et al. Radiological report of pilot study for the Korean Lung Cancer Screening (K-LUCAS) project: feasibility of implementing lung imaging reporting and data system. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:803-808   DOI
7 McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 2002;22:1541-1553   DOI
8 Larke FJ, Kruger RL, Cagnon CH, Flynn MJ, McNitt-Gray MM, Wu X, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with lowdose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:1165-1169   DOI
9 Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Swensen SJ. A consensus statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2001;16:65-68   DOI
10 AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT (Report No. 96). College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2008
11 AAPM Task Group 204. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2008
12 McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 2011;259:311-316   DOI