Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1906.06052

A Laboratory-Scale Study of the Applicability of a Halophilic Sediment Bioelectrochemical System for in situ Reclamation of Water and Sediment in Brackish Aquaculture Ponds: Effects of Operational Conditions on Performance  

Pham, Hai The (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE), Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Vu, Phuong Ha (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE), Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Nguyen, Thuy Thu Thi (Research group for Physiology and Applications of Microorganisms (PHAM group), GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE), Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Bui, Ha Viet Thi (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Tran, Huyen Thanh Thi (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Tran, Hanh My (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Nguyen, Huy Quang (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, Vietnam National University in Hanoi - University of Science)
Kim, Byung Hong (Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.29, no.10, 2019 , pp. 1607-1623 More about this Journal
Abstract
Sediment bioelectrochemical systems (SBESs) can be integrated into brackish aquaculture ponds for in-situ bioremediation of the pond water and sediment. Such an in-situ system offers advantages including reduced treatment cost, reusability and simple handling. In order to realize such an application potential of the SBES, in this laboratory-scale study we investigated the effect of several controllable and uncontrollable operational factors on the in-situ bioremediation performance of a tank model of a brackish aquaculture pond, into which a SBES was integrated, in comparison with a natural degradation control model. The performance was evaluated in terms of electricity generation by the SBES, Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and nitrogen removal of both the tank water and the tank sediment. Real-life conditions of the operational parameters were also experimented to understand the most close-to-practice responses of the system to their changes. Predictable effects of controllable parameters including external resistance and electrode spacing, similar to those reported previously for the BESs, were shown by the results but exceptions were observed. Accordingly, while increasing the electrode spacing reduced the current densities but generally improved COD and nitrogen removal, increasing the external resistance could result in decreased COD removal but also increased nitrogen removal and decreased current densities. However, maximum electricity generation and COD removal efficiency difference of the SBES (versus the control) could be reached with an external resistance of $100{\Omega}$, not with the lowest one of $10{\Omega}$. The effects of uncontrollable parameters such as ambient temperature, salinity and pH of the pond (tank) water were rather unpredictable. Temperatures higher than $35^{\circ}C$ seemed to have more accelaration effect on natural degradation than on bioelectrochemical processes. Changing salinity seriously changed the electricity generation but did not clearly affect the bioremediation performance of the SBES, although at 2.5% salinity the SBES displayed a significantly more efficient removal of nitrogen in the water, compared to the control. Variation of pH to practically extreme levels (5.5 and 8.8) led to increased electricity generations but poorer performances of the SBES (vs. the control) in removing COD and nitrogen. Altogether, the results suggest some distinct responses of the SBES under brackish conditions and imply that COD removal and nitrogen removal in the system are not completely linked to bioelectrochemical processes but electrochemically enriched bacteria can still perform non-bioelectrochemical COD and nitrogen removals more efficiently than natural ones. The results confirm the application potential of the SBES in brackish aquaculture bioremediation and help propose efficient practices to warrant the success of such application in real-life scenarios.
Keywords
Sediment bioelectrochemical systems; brackish aquaculture; in situ bioremediation; operational conditions;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rossi R, Yang W, Zikmund E, Pant D, Logan BE. 2018. In situ biofilm removal from air cathodes in microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 265: 200-206.   DOI
2 Liu H, Cheng SA, Logan BE. 2005. Power generation in fedbatch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39: 5488-5493.   DOI
3 Hong SW, Chang IS, Choi YS, Chung TH. 2009. Experimental evaluation of influential factors for electricity harvesting from sediment using microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 3029-3035.   DOI
4 He Z, Huang Y, Manohar AK, Mansfeld F. 2008. Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioelectrochemistry 74: 78-82.   DOI
5 Sajana TK, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A. 2013. Effect of pH and distance between electrodes on the performance of a sediment microbial fuel cell. Water Sci. Technol. 68: 537-543.   DOI
6 Aelterman P, Rabaey K, Pham HT, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2006. Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 3388-3394.   DOI
7 Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schrorder U, Keller J, Freguia S, et al. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 5181-5192.   DOI
8 Logan BE. 2008. Microbial fuel cells, pp. 54-55. Ed. John Wiley & Sons.
9 Zhang X, Zhu F, Chen L, Zhao Q, Tao G. 2013. Removal of ammonia nitrogen from wastewater using an aerobic cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 146: 161-168.   DOI
10 Viet TN, Behera SK, Kim JW, Park H-S. 2008. Effects of oxidation reduction potential and organic compounds on anammox reaction in batch cultures. Environ. Eng. Res. 13: 210-215.   DOI
11 Gonzalez del Campo A, Canizares P, Lobato J, Rodrigo M, Fernandez Morales FJ. 2016. Effects of External Resistance on Microbial Fuel Cell's Performance, pp. 175-197. In Lefebvre G, Jimenez E, Cabanas B (eds.), Environment, Energy and Climate Change II: Energies from New Resources and the Climate Change, Ed. Springer International Publishing, Cham
12 Menicucci J, Beyenal H, Marsili E, Veluchamy RA, Demir G, Lewandowski Z. 2006. Procedure for determining maximum sustainable power generated by microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 1062-1068.   DOI
13 Greenberg A, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edn, pp. 5-16. Ed. American public health association, Washington.
14 Vyrides I, Stuckey D. 2009. A modified method for the determination of chemical oxygen demand (COD) for samples with high salinity and low organics. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 979-982.   DOI
15 Sajana TK, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A. 2014. Effect of operating parameters on the performance of sediment microbial fuel cell treating aquaculture water. Aquac. Eng. 61: 17-26.   DOI
16 Song S-H, Yeom S-H, Choi S-S, Yoo Y-J. 2003. Effect of oxidation-reduction potential on denitrification by Ochrobactrum anthropi SY509. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 13: 473-476.
17 Sajana TK, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A. 2013. Application of sediment microbial fuel cell for in situ reclamation of aquaculture pond water quality. Aquacultural Eng. 57: 101-107.   DOI
18 Mohan Y, Das D. 2009. Effect of ionic strength, cation exchanger and inoculum age on the performance of Microbial Fuel Cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34: 7542-7546.   DOI
19 Doronina NV, Gogleva AA, Trotsenko YA. 2012. Methylophilus glucosoxydans sp. nov., a restricted facultative methylotroph from rice rhizosphere. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 196-201.   DOI
20 Aruga S, Kamagata Y, Kohno T, Hanada S, Nakamura K, Kanagawa T. 2002. Characterization of filamentous Eikelboom type 021N bacteria and description of Thiothrix disciformis sp. nov. and Thiothrix flexilis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52: 1309-1316.   DOI
21 Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 99: 4044-4064.   DOI
22 Yan N, Marschner P, Cao W, Zuo C, Qin W. 2015. Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms. Int. Soil Water Conservation Res. 3: 316-323.   DOI
23 Bower CE, Bidwell JP. 1978. Ionization of ammonia in seawater: effects of temperature, pH, and salinity. J. Fisheries Res. Board Canada 35: 1012-1016.   DOI
24 Pham TH, Tran TH, Vu TL, Dang TH, Nguyen TTT, Dang THT, et al. 2019. A laboratory-scale study of the applicability of a halophilic sediment bioelectrochemical system for in situ reclamation of water and sediment in brackish aquaculture ponds: establishment, bacterial community and performance evaluation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 1104-1116.   DOI
25 Kim BH, Chang IS, Gadd GM. 2007. Challenges in microbial fuel cell development and operation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 76: 485-494.   DOI
26 Isnansetyo A, Getsu SAI, Seguchi M, Koriyama M. 2014. Independent effects of temperature, salinity, ammonium concentration and pH on nitrification rate of the ariake seawater above mud sediment. HAYATI J. Biosci. 21: 21-30.   DOI
27 Reimers CE, Tender LM, Fertig S, Wang W. 2001. Harvesting energy from the marine sediment-water interface. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35: 192-195.   DOI
28 Bond DR, Holmes DE, Tender LM, Lovley DR. 2002. Electrode-reducing microorganisms that harvest energy from marine sediments. Science 295: 483-485.   DOI
29 Jang JK, Pham TH, Chang IS, Kang KH, Moon H, Cho KS, et al. 2004. Construction and operation of a novel mediatorand membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem. 39: 1007-1012.   DOI
30 Lovley DR. 2006. Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4: 497-508.   DOI
31 Venkata Mohan S, Velvizhi G, Annie Modestra J, Srikanth S. 2014. Microbial fuel cell: critical factors regulating biocatalyzed electrochemical process and recent advancements. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 40: 779-797.   DOI
32 Yang W, Rossi R, Tian Y, Kim K-Y, Logan BE. 2018. Mitigating external and internal cathode fouling using a polymer bonded separator in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 249: 1080-1084.   DOI
33 Boyd CE. 1998. Pond water aeration systems. Aquacultural Eng. 18: 9-40.   DOI
34 Zhang F, Pant D, Logan BE. 2011. Long-term performance of activated carbon air cathodes with different diffusion layer porosities in microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 30: 49-55.   DOI
35 Fuller RJ. 2007. Solar heating systems for recirculation aquaculture. Aquac. Eng. 36: 250-260.   DOI
36 Zhang L, Li C, Ding L, Xu K, Ren H. 2011. Influences of initial pH on performance and anodic microbes of fed-batch microbial fuel cells. J Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 86: 1226-1232.   DOI
37 Madigan MT, Bender KS, Buckley DH, Sattley WM, Stahl DA. 2019. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 15th Ed., pp. 188-189. Ed. Pearson Education Inc., NJ.
38 Boyd CE, Schmittou HR. 1999. Achievement of sustainable aquaculture through environmental management. Aquac. Economics Manag. 3: 59-69.   DOI
39 Rossi R, Jones D, Myung J, Zikmund E, Yang W, Gallego YA, et al. 2019. Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests. Water Res. 148: 51-59.   DOI
40 Gil G-C, In-Seop C, Byung Hong K, Mia K, Jae-Kyung J, Hyung Soo P, et al. 2003. Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens. Bioelectron. 18: 327-334.   DOI
41 Pham TH, Aelterman P, Verstraete W. 2009. Bioanode performance in bioelectrochemical systems: recent improvements and prospects. Trends Biotechnol. 27: 168-178.   DOI
42 Scott K, Cotlarciuc I, Hall D, Lakeman JB, Browning D. 2008. Power from marine sediment fuel cells: the influence of anode material. J. Appl. Electrochem. 38: 1313-1319.   DOI
43 Scott K, Cotlarciuc I, Head I, Katuri KP, Hall D, Lakeman JB, et al. 2008. Fuel cell power generation from marine sediments: investigation of cathode materials. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 83: 1244-1254.   DOI