1 |
Brody, T. (2006). Evaluating research impact through open access to scholarly communication (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
|
2 |
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
DOI
|
3 |
Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
4 |
Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 36 (pp. 3-72). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
|
5 |
Deng, S., & Dotson, L. (2015). Redefining scholarly services in a research lifecycle. In B. L. Eden (Ed.), Creating research infrastructures in the 21st-century academic library: conceiving, funding, and building new facilities and staff (pp. 77-92). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
|
6 |
Disabato, N. (2012). Publication standards part 1: The fragmented present. A List Apart, no. 352. Retrieved from http://alistapart.com/article/publication-standards-part-1-the-fragmented-present.
|
7 |
Dowling, G. R. (2014). Playing the citations game: From publish or perish to be cited or sidelined. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 22(4), 280-287.
DOI
|
8 |
Haider, S. J., & Mahmood, K. (2006). Post-master LIS education at Punjab University (Lahore). Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 37(3), 3-8.
|
9 |
Haider, S. J., & Mahmood, K. (2007). MPhil and PhD library and information science research in Pakistan: An evaluation. Library Review, 56(5), 407-417.
DOI
|
10 |
Aksnes, D. W., Schneider, J. W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36-43.
DOI
|
11 |
Agyeman, E.A., & Bilson, A. (2015). Research focus and trends in nuclear science and technology in Ghana: A bibliometric study based on the INIS database. Library Philosophy and Practice. Paper 1212. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1212.
|
12 |
Ahmad, P. (2007). LIS education in Pakistan at postgraduate level. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 38(2), 12-23.
|
13 |
Ahmad, S., & Mahmood, K. (2011). Library and information science education in Pakistan: A decade of development - 2000 to 2009. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 42(3), 3-12.
|
14 |
Ameen, K. (2011). Changing scenario of librarianship in Pakistan: Managing with the challenges and opportunities. Library Management, 32(3), 171-182.
DOI
|
15 |
Ameen, K., & Ullah, M. (2013). Challenges of getting faculty status: Perception of university librarians in Pakistan. The International Information & Library Review, 45(1), 83-91.
DOI
|
16 |
Arts & Humanities Research Council (2014). The academic book of the future: Call for proposals. Swindon, UK: AHRC. Retrieved from http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/Funding-Opportunities/Pages/Future-of-the-Academic-Book.aspx.
|
17 |
Aslam Bhatti, M., & Arif, M. (2006). Library and information science distance education and continuing professional development in Pakistan. Library Review, 55(5), 307-313. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530610667576.
DOI
|
18 |
Association of Research Librarians (ARL) (n.d). Scholarly communication. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/scholarly-communication#.VVWa2EZ5lmM.
|
19 |
Liu, Z. (2003).Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications. Information Processing & Management, 39(6), 889-898.
DOI
|
20 |
Jan, S. U., & Anwar, M. A. (2013). Impact of Pakistani authors in the GOOGLE world: A study of library and information science faculty. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 980.
|
21 |
Kwon, N. H., Lee, J. Y., & Chung, E. K. (2012). Understanding scientific research lifecycle: Based on bioand nano-scientists’ research activities. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(3), 103-131.
DOI
|
22 |
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862.
DOI
|
23 |
Lee, J. Y., Chung, E. K., & Kwon, N. H. (2012). Scientists’ information behavior for bridging the gaps encountered in the process of the scientific research lifecycle. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3), 99-122.
DOI
|
24 |
Mahmood, K. (1996). Library and information services in Pakistan: A review of articles published in foreign journals. The International Information & Library Review, 28(4), 383-405.
DOI
|
25 |
Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2010). Changing research scenario in Pakistan and demand for research qualified LIS professionals. Library Review, 59(4), 291-303.
DOI
|
26 |
Maron, N. L., & Smith, K. K. (2008). Current models of digital scholarly communication: Results of an investigation conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
|
27 |
Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2009). LIS research in Pakistan: An analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2009 (June).
|
28 |
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.
DOI
|
29 |
Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
30 |
Samdani, R. A., & Bhatti, R. (2011). Doctoral research in library and information science by Pakistani professionals: An analysis. Library Philosophy & Practices (November 2011). Retrieved from http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/samdani-bhatti.pdf.
|
31 |
Nightingale, J. M., & Marshall, G. (2012). Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance. Radiography, 18(2), 60-67.
DOI
|
32 |
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., & Huntington, P. (2004). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want? Learned Publishing, 17(4), 261-273.
DOI
|
33 |
Sarli, C. C., Dubinsky, E. K., & Holmes, K. L. (2010). Beyond citation analysis: A model for assessment of research impact. JMLA, 98(1), 17.
DOI
|
34 |
Schlögl, C., & Stock, W. G. (2008). Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: The case of LIS journals. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 643-666.
DOI
|
35 |
Thorin, S. E. (2006). Global changes in scholarly communication. In H. S. Ching, P. W. T. Poon, & C. McNaught (Eds.), eLearning and digital publishing (pp. 221-240). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
36 |
Warraich, N. F., & Ahmad, S. (2011). Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science: A bibliometric analysis. Pakistan Journal of Library & Information Science, 12, 1-7.
|
37 |
Todd, H. (2012). A partnership to support the research lifecycle: A case study from the University of Queensland Library. In International Conference on Change and Challenge: Redefine the Future of Academic Libraries, Peking University, Beijing, China, 4-6 November 2012.
|
38 |
Vaughan, K. T. L., Hayes, B. E., Lerner, R. C., McElfresh, K. R., Pavlech, L., Romito, D., & Morris, E. N. (2013). Development of the research lifecycle model for library services. JMLA, 101(4), 310-314.
DOI
|
39 |
Wolski, M., & Richardson, J. (2014). A model for institutional infrastructure to support digital scholarship. Publications, 2(4), 83-99.
DOI
|
40 |
Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
|
41 |
Willard, P., Kennan, M. A., Wilson, C. S., & White, H. D. (2008). Publication by Australian LIS academics and practitioners: A preliminary investigation. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 39(2), 65-78.
DOI
|