Browse > Article

Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System in the LIS tradition for the e-Environment  

Satija, M.P. (Guru Nanak Dev University Amritsar-143005 India)
Martinez-Avila, Daniel (Sao Paulo State University Hygino Muzzi Filho 737 17525-900 Marilia, Brazil)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.3, no.4, 2015 , pp. 62-77 More about this Journal
This paper describes qualities of a library classification system that are commonly discussed in the LIS tradition and literature, and explains such a system’s three main functions, namely knowledge mapping, information retrieval, and shelf arrangement. In this vein, the paper states the functional requirements of bibliographic classifications, which broadly are subject collocation and facilitation of browsing the collection. It explains with details the components of a library classification system and their functions. The major components are schedules, notations, and index. It also states their distinguished features, such as generalia class, form divisions, book numbers, and devices for number synthesis which are not required in a knowledge classification. It illustrates with examples from the WebDewey good examples of added features of an online library classification system. It emphasizes that institutional backup and a revision machinery are essential for a classification to survive and remain relevant in the print and e-environment.
Book numbers; Classification; Classification policy; Knowledge classification; Library classification; Online classification; WebDewey;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Broughton, V. (2015). Essential classification, 2nd. ed. London: Facet.
2 Chan, L.M. (2007). Cataloguing and classification: An introduction (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, pp. 309-318.
3 Foskett, A.C. (1996). The subject approach to information (5th ed.). London LA Publishing, pp. 253-255.
4 Kumar, K. (2004). The theory of classification. New Delhi: Vikas, pp. 388-408.
5 Kumbhar. R. (2011). Library classification trends in the 21st Century. Oxford: Chandos.
6 Palmer, B.I., & Wells, A.J. (1951). The fundamentals of library classification. London: George Allen, pp. 60-75.
7 Vickery, B.C. (1972). Classification principles in natural language indexing systems. In A. Maltby (Ed.), Classification in the 1970’s (pp. 167-191). London: Clive Bingley.
8 Hjørland, B. (2014). Is facet analysis based on rationalism? A discussion of Satija (1992), Tennis (2008), Herre (2013), Mazzocchi (2013b), and Dousa & Ibekwe-SanJuan (2014). Knowledge Organization, 41, 369-376.
9 Hunter, E.J. (2009). Classification made simple (3rd ed.). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
10 Koch, T., Brümmer, A., Hiom, D., Peereboom, M., Poulter, A., & Worsfold, E. (1997). DESIRE: Project Deliverable. Retrieved from
11 Kwaśnik, B.H. & Rubin, V.L. (2004). Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 37(1), 33-47.
12 Maltby, A. (1978). Sayers manual of classification for librarians (5th ed.). London: Andre Deutsch.
13 Mills, J. (1962). A modern outline of library classification. Bombay: Asia.
14 Palmer, B. I. (1962). Itself an education: Six lectures on classification. London: The Library Association.
15 Philips, H.W. (1961). A primer of book classification (5th ed.). London: AAL.
16 Ranganathan, S.R. (1949). Self-perpetuating scheme of classification. Journal of Documentation, 4, 223-244.   DOI
17 Ranganathan, S.R. (1964). General and special classification: Papers presented to the second International Study Conference on Classification Research Elsinore, 1964. In P. A. Atherton (Ed.), Classification research: Proceedings of the second International Study Conference, Elsinore, 14-18 Sept, 1965 (pp. 81-93). Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1965.
18 Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 58 (1/2), 49-72.
19 Ranganathan, S.R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (3rd ed.). Mumbai: Asia.
20 Curwen, A.G. (1978). Revision of classification schemes: Policies and practices. Journal of Librarianship, 10(1), 19-38.   DOI
21 Buchanan, B. (1979). Theory of library classification. London: Bingley.
22 Comaromi, J.P. (1982). Manual on the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification, Edition 19. Albany, NY: Forest Press.
23 Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 40, 545-557.
24 Ranganathan, S.R. (1989). Elements of library classification. New Delhi: UBSPD.
25 Satija, M.P. (2000). Classification: An essay in terminology. Knowledge Organization, 27(4), 221-229.
26 Satija, M.P. (2004). A dictionary of knowledge organizaorganization. Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University.
27 Ranganathan, S.R. (1968). Choice of a scheme for classification. Library Science Documentation, 5(1), 1-69.
28 Ranganathan, S.R., & Gopinath, M.A. (1989). Colon Classification (Ed. 7, basic and depth version). Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.
29 Rowley, J., & Farrow, J. (2000). Organizing knowledge: An introduction to managing access to information (3rd ed.). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
30 Rowley, J., & Hartley, R. (2008). Organizing knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
31 Satija, M.P. (2008). Book numbers: Indian and Cutter. New Delhi: Viva Books.
32 Satija, M.P. (2013). The theory and practice of the Dewey Decimal Classification (2nd ed.). Oxford: Chandos.
33 Satija, M.P., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2014). Use of classification in organizing and searching the web. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61(4), 294-306.
34 Slavic, Aida. (2008). Faceted classification: Management and use. Axiomathes, 18(2), DOI: 10.1007/s10516-007-9030-z   DOI
35 Taylor, A.G., & Joudrey, D.N. (2009). The organization of information (3rd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
36 Vickery, B. C. (1966). Faceted classification schemes. New Brunswick, NJ: Graduate School of Library Service, Rutgers University.