Browse > Article

Internal Structure of Information Packages in Digital Preservation  

Lee, Seungmin (Department of Library and Information Science Sookmyung Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.2, no.4, 2014 , pp. 6-19 More about this Journal
The description of preserved resources is one of the requirements in digital preservation. The description is generally created in the format of metadata records, and those records are combined to generate information packages to support the process of digital preservation. However, current strategies or models of digital preservation may not generate information packages in efficient ways. To overcome these problems, this research proposed an internal structure of information packages in digital preservation. In order to construct the internal structure, this research analyzed existing metadata standards and cataloging rules such as Dublin Core, MARC, and FRBR to extract the core elements of resource description. The extracted elements were categorized according to their semantics and functions, which resulted in three categories of core elements. These categories and core elements were manifested by using RDF syntax in order to be substantially applied to combine metadata records in digital preservation. Although the internal structure is not intended to create metadata records, it is expected to provide an alternative approach to enable combining existing metadata records in the context of digital preservation in a more flexible way.
Digital preservation; Information package; Metadata record; Internal structure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Heslop, H., Davis, S., & Wilson, A. (2002). An approach to the preservation of digital records. National Archives of Australia. Retrieved October 22, 2004, from
2 Beagrie, N. (2002). A continuing access and digital preservation strategy for the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), 2002-2005. Retrieved September 18, 2014, from
3 Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Retrieved September 29, 2014, from
4 Crow, R. (2004). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, 2002. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from
5 Digital Preservation Coalition (2012). Digital preservation handbook. Retrieved October 27, 2014, from
6 Gomes, D., Miranda, J., & Costa, M. (2011). A survey on Web archiving initiatives. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL '11): Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 408-420. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7 Hedstrom, M. (1998). Digital preservation: A time bomb for digital libraries. Computers and the Humanities, 31, 189-202.
8 IMS (2003). IMS Digital Repositories Specification. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from
9 Lane, H. (2012). Models for the EU Arctic Information Centre: Engaging the polar libraries colloquy. In Proceedings of the 24th polar libraries colloquy: Cold regions: Pivot points, focal points, 169-170. Boulder, CO, USA, June 11-14.
10 Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Bimonthly Report, 226. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from
11 Vardigan, M., & Whiteman, Cole. ICPSR meets OAIS: Applying the OAIS reference model to the social science archive context. Archival Science, 7, 73-87.
12 NLII (National Learning Infrastructure Initiative) (2003). Learning objects (NLII 2002-2003 Key Themes). Retrieved September 20, 2014, from