1 |
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
|
2 |
Arazy, O., & Kopak, R. (2011). On the measurability of information quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 89-99.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Borlund, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 56, 71-90.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Courtright, C. (2007). Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 273-306.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
|
6 |
Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467-1484.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Hovland, C. I, Janis, I. L, & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University press.
|
8 |
Johnson T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865-879.
DOI
|
9 |
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325-340.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Lim, S. (2013). College students' credibility judgments and heuristics concerning Wikipedia. Information Processing & Management, 49, 405-419.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413-439.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Rieh, S. Y. (2010). Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In M. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd ed., pp. 1337-1344). New York: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
|
13 |
Rieh, S. Y. & Danielson, D. R. (2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 307-364.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Rieh, S. Y., Jeon, G. Y-J, Yang, J., & Lampe, C. (2014). Audience-aware credibility: From understanding audience to establishing credible blogs. Proceedings of the Eight International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2014), 436-445.
|
15 |
Rieh, S. Y., Kim, Y. M., Yang, J. Y., & St. Jean, B. (2010). A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the Web: Preliminary findings. Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47.
|
16 |
Sundin, O., & Francke, H. (2009). In search of credibility: Pupils' information practices in learning environments. Information Research, 14(4), paper 418.
|
17 |
Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145-161.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Saracevic, T. (2010). The notion of context in "Information Interaction in Context." Proceedings of the Information Interaction in Context (IIiX 2010).
|
19 |
St. Jean, B, Rieh, S. Y., Yang, J. Y., & Kim, Y. M. (2011). How content contributors assess and establish credibility on the Web. Proc. of the 74rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48.
|
20 |
Wang, P., & Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 115-133.
DOI
|
21 |
Xie, I. (2008). Interactive information retrieval in digital environments. Hershey, PA: GI Global.
|
22 |
Xu, Q. (2013). Social recommendation, source credibility, and recency: Effects of news cues in a social bookmarking website. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 757-775.
DOI
ScienceOn
|