Browse > Article

Differential Response of Etiolated Pea Seedlings to Inoculation with Rhizobacteria Capable of Utilizing 1-Aminocydopropane-1-Carboxylate or L-Methionine  

Shaharoona, Baby (Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture)
Arshad, Muhammad (Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture)
Khalid, Azeem (Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology / v.45, no.1, 2007 , pp. 15-20 More about this Journal
Abstract
The majority of soil microorganisms can derive ethylene from L-methionine (L-MET), while some rhizobacteria can hydrolyze 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) due to their ACC-deaminase activity. In this study, three strains having either ACC-deaminase activity (Pseudomonas putida biotype A, $A_7$), or the ability to produce ethylene from L-MET (Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, $M_9$) or both (Pseudomonas fluorescens, $AM_3$) were used for inoculation. The highly ethylene specific bioassay of a classical 'triple' response in pea seedlings was used to investigate the effect of the inoculation with the rhizobacteria in the presence of 10 mM ACC or L-MET. The exogenous application of ACC had a concentration-dependent effect on the etiolated pea seedlings in creating the classical 'triple' response. The inoculation with P. putida diluted the effect of ACC, which was most likely due to its ACC-deaminase activity. Similarly, the application of $Co^{2+}$ reduced the ACC-imposed effect on etiolated pea seedlings. In contrast, the inoculation of A. calcoaceticus or P. fluorescens in the presence of L-MET caused a stronger classical 'triple' response in etiolated pea seedlings; most likely by producing ethylene from L-MET. This is the first study, to our knowledge, reporting on the comparative effect of rhizobacteria capable of utilizing ACC vs L-MET on etiolated pea seedlings.
Keywords
Ethylene; 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate; L-methionine; pea seedlings; rhizobacteria; ACC-deaminase;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 10  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 12
연도 인용수 순위
1 McKeon, T.A., J.C. Fernandez-Maculet, and S.F. Yang. 1995. Biosynthesis and metabolism of ethylene, p. 118-139. In P.J. Davies (ed.), Plant Hormones, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-1995. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
2 Primrose, S.B. 1977. Evaluation of the role of methional, 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid and peroxidase in ethylene formation by Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Mircrobiol. 98, 519-528   DOI
3 Shaharoona, B., M. Arshad, and Z.A. Zahir. 2006a. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42, 155-159   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ton, J., S. Davison, S.C.M. van Wees, L.C. van Loon, and C.M.J. Pieterse. 2001. The Arabidopsis ISRI locus controlling rhizobacteria- mediated induced systemic resistance is involved in ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol. 125, 652--661   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Abeles, F.B., P.W. Morgan, and M.E. Saltveit, Jr. 1992. Ethylene in plant biology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA
6 Akhtar, M.J., M. Arshad, A. Khalid, and M.H. Mahmood. 2005. Substrate-dependent biosynthesis of ethylene by rhizosphere soil fungi and its influence on etiolated pea seedlings. Pedobiologia 49, 211-219   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Belimov, A.A., V.I. Safronova, and T. Mimura. 2002. Response of spring rape (Brassica napus var. oleifera L.) to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing-1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 189-199   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Chen, Q.C. and A.B. Bleecker. 1995. Analysis of ethylene signaltransduction kinetic associated with seedling-growth response and chitinase induction in wild type and mutant Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 108, 597-607   DOI
9 Glick, B.R., D.M. Penrose, and J. Li. 1998. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growthpromoting bacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 190, 63-68   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ince, J.E. and C.J. Knowles. 1986. Ethylene formation by cell free extract of Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 146, 151-158   DOI
11 Flores-Vargas, R.D. and G.W. O'Hara. 2006. Isolation and characterization of rhizosphere bacteria with potential for biological control of weeds in vineyards. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100, 946-954   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ghosh, S., J.N. Penterman, R.D. Little, R. Chavez, and B.R. Glick. 2003. Three newly isolated plant growth-promoting bacilli facilitate the seedling growth of canola, Brassica campestris. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 41, 277-281   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lurssen, K., K. Naumann, and R. Schroder. 1979. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid an intermediate of the ethylene biosynthesis in higher plants. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 92, 285-294   DOI
14 Reid, M.S. 1995. Ethylene in plant growth, development and senescence, p. 486-508. In P.J. Davies (ed.), Plant Hormone, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
15 Bleecker, A.B., M.A. Estelle, C. Sommeruille, and H. Kende. 1988. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241, 1086-1089   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Guzman, P. and J.R. Ecker. 1990. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Am. Soc. Plant Physiol. 2, 513-523
17 Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 2002. Ethylene: agricultural sources and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA
18 Khalid, A., M. Arshad, and Z.A. Zahir. 2004. Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96, 473-480   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jia, Y.J, Y. Kakuta, M. Sugawara, T. Igarashi, N. Oki, M. Kisaki, T. Shoji, Y. Kanetuna, T. Horita, H. Matsui, and M. Honma. 1999. Synthesis and degradation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by Penicillium ctrinum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 63, 542-549   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Nazli, Z.H., M. Arshad, and A. Khalid. 2003. 2-Keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid-dependent biosynthesis of ethylene in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37, 130-135
21 Nagatsu, T. and K. Yagi. 1966. A simple assay of monoamine oxidase and D-amino acid oxidase by measuring ammonia. J. Biochem. 60, 219-221   DOI   PUBMED
22 Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 1988. Influence of ethylene produced by soil microorganisms on etiolated pea seedlings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 2728-2732   PUBMED
23 Li, J., D.H. Ovakim, T.C. Charles, and B.R. Glick. 2000. An ACC deaminase minus mutant of Enterobacter cloacae UW4 no longer promotes root elongation. Curr. Microbiol. 41, 101-105   DOI
24 Neljubow, D. 1901. Uber die horizontale nutation der stengel von Pisum sativum und einiger anderer pflanzen. Beih. Bot. Zentralbl. 10, 128-138
25 Shaharoona, B., M. Arshad, Z.A. Zahir, and A. Khalid. 2006b. Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2971-2975   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Barry, C.S., E.A. Fox, H. Yen, S. Lee, T. Ying, D. Grierson, and J.J. Giovannoni. 2001. Analysis of ethylene response in the epinastic mutant of tomato. Plant Physiol. 127, 58-66   DOI
27 Dworkin, M. and J. Foster. 1958. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J. Bacteriol. 75, 592-601   PUBMED
28 Penrose, D.M. and B.R. Glick. 2001. Levels of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in exudates and extracts of canola seeds treated with plant growth-promoting bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 41, 368-372
29 McKeon, T.A., N.E. Hoffmann, and S.F. Yang. 1982. The effect of plant-hormone pretreatments on ethylene production and synthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in waterstressed wheat leaves. Planta 155, 437-443   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, Jr. 1998. Plant-growth regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv. Agron. 62, 145-151
31 Wang, C., E. Knill, B.R. Glick, and G. Defagox. 2000. Effect of transferring 1-aminocycloproane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth promoting and disease suppressive capacities. Can. J. Microbiol. 46, 898-907   DOI
32 Simons, M., A.J. van der Bij, I. Brand, L.A. de Weger, C.A. Wijffelman, and B.J.J. Lugtenberg. 1996. Gnotobiotic system for studying rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas bacteria. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9, 600-607   DOI   PUBMED
33 Khalid, A., M.J. Akhtar, M.H. Mahmood, and M. Arshad. 2006. Effect of substrate-dependent microbial produced ethylene on plant growth. Microbiology 75, 231-236   DOI