Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275

Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis  

Yoon, Chang Ho (Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Shin, In-Soo (Department of Education, Jeonju University College of Education)
Kim, Mee Kum (Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Medical Science / v.33, no.44, 2018 , pp. 275.1-275.15 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: We compared the efficacy between trifocal and bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Through PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, we searched potentially relevant articles published from 1990 to 2018. Defocus curves, visual acuities (VAs) were measured as primary outcomes. Spectacle dependence, postoperative refraction, contrast sensitivity (CS), glare, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured as secondary outcomes. Effects were pooled using random-effects method. Results: We included 11 clinical trials, with a total of 787 eyes (395 subjects). The trifocal IOL group showed better binocular distance VA corrected with defocus levels of -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.5 diopter than the bifocal IOL group (All $P{\leq}0.004$). The trifocal IOL group showed better monocular uncorrected distance and intermediate VAs (mean difference [MD], -0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07, -0.01; P = 0.006 and MD, -0.07 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.13, -0.01; P = 0.03, respectively). Postoperative refraction, glare, CS, and HOAs were not significantly different from each other. Conclusion: The overall findings indicate that trifocal diffractive IOL implantation is better than the bifocal diffractive IOL in intermediate VA, and provides similar or better in distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in the visual quality.
Keywords
Bifocal; Diffractive; Intraocular Lens; Meta-analysis; Trifocal;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1987;13(5):557-60.   DOI
2 Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Sao Paulo Med J 2015;133(1):68.   DOI
3 Shah S, Peris-Martinez C, Reinhard T, Vinciguerra P. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery: multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2015;31(10):658-66.   DOI
4 Lane SS, Morris M, Nordan L, Packer M, Tarantino N, Wallace RB 3rd. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19(1):89-105.   DOI
5 Voskresenskaya A, Pozdeyeva N, Pashtaev N, Batkov Y, Treushnicov V, Cherednik V. Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248(9):1299-306.   DOI
6 Gatinel D, Pagnoulle C, Houbrechts Y, Gobin L. Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(11):2060-7.   DOI
7 Montes-Mico R, Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, Pons AM. In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39(6):928-36.   DOI
8 Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Lazaro S, Montes-Mico R. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg 2013;29(11):749-54.   DOI
9 Papadatou E, Del Aguila-Carrasco AJ, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Madrid-Costa D, Montes-Mico R. Assessing the in vitro optical quality of presbyopic solutions based on the axial modulation transfer function. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42(5):780-7.   DOI
10 Brito P, Salgado-Borges J, Neves H, Gonzalez-Meijome J, Monteiro M. Light-distortion analysis as a possible indicator of visual quality after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41(3):613-22.   DOI
11 Jonker SM, Bauer NJ, Makhotkina NY, Berendschot TT, van den Biggelaar FJ, Nuijts RM. Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a +3.0 D bifocal IOL: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41(8):1631-40.   DOI
12 Sistrom CL, Mergo PJ. A simple method for obtaining original data from published graphs and plots. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(5):1241-4.   DOI
13 Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:455-61.
14 Mojzis P, Kukuckova L, Majerova K, Liehneova K, Pinero DP. Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL. J Refract Surg 2014;30(10):666-72.   DOI
15 Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14(1):135.   DOI
16 Shinichi A. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Online Kensaku 2014;35(3):154-5.
17 Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. http://www.ohri.ca/Programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Updated 2016. Accessed Oct 19, 2016.
18 Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000;19(22):3127-31.   DOI
19 Postolache C, Postolache O. Comparation of refractive results with bifocal implants at Lisa 809 and trifocal at Lisa tri839. Rom J Ophthalmol 2015;59(2):100-2.
20 Alio JL, Kaymak H, Breyer D, Cochener B, Plaza-Puche AB. Quality of life related variables measured for three multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;46(4):380-8.   DOI
21 Cochener B. Prospective clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2016;32(3):146-51.   DOI
22 Kaymak H, Breyer D, Alio JL, Cochener B. Visual performance with bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective three-armed randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Refract Surg 2017;33(10):655-62.   DOI
23 Mojzis P, Kukuckova L, Majerova K, Ziak P, Pinero DP. Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(10):1528-33.
24 Bilbao-Calabuig R, Gonzalez-Lopez F, Amparo F, Alvarez G, Patel SR, Llovet-Osuna F. Comparison between mix-and-match implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses and bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2016;32(10):659-63.   DOI
25 Plaza-Puche AB, Alio JL. Analysis of defocus curves of different modern multifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016;26(5):412-7.   DOI
26 Vilar C, Hida WT, de Medeiros AL, Magalhaes KRP, de Moraes Tzelikis PF, Chaves MAPD, et al. Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2017;11:1393-7.   DOI
27 Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:805-11.
28 Plaza-Puche AB, Alio JL, Sala E, Mojzis P. Impact of low mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes in different types of modern multifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016;26(6):612-7.   DOI
29 de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(8):1316-22.   DOI
30 Liu JW, Haw WW. Optimizing outcomes of multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014;25(1):44-8.   DOI
31 Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P, Lesieur G, Heireman S, Blanckaert JA, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2012;6:1421-7.
32 Marques EF, Ferreira TB. Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41(2):354-63.   DOI
33 Vinas M, Gonzalez-Ramos A, Dorronsoro C, Akondi V, Garzon N, Poyales F, et al. In vivo measurement of longitudinal chromatic aberration in patients implanted with trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2017;33(11):736-42.   DOI
34 Millan MS, Vega F, Rios-Lopez I. Polychromatic image performance of diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses: longitudinal chromatic aberration and energy efficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57(4):2021-8.   DOI
35 Millan MS, Vega F. Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: chromatic performance. Biomed Opt Express 2017;8(9):4294-309.   DOI
36 Shen Z, Lin Y, Zhu Y, Liu X, Yan J, Yao K. Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):45337.   DOI
37 de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;12:CD003169.
38 Cetinkaya S, Dadaci Z, Acir NO, Cetinkaya YF, Yener HI, Ozcimen M. Visual outcomes of multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high hyperopia and patient selection. Int J Ophthalmol 2015;8(6):1258-60.
39 Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby S. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(9):1459-63.   DOI
40 de Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR, Bauer NJ, de Brabander J, Berendschot TT, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(5):859-65.   DOI
41 Xu Z, Cao D, Chen X, Wu S, Wang X, Wu Q. Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12(10):e0186522.   DOI