1 |
Health Information Technology Institute of Mitretek Systems. Health Summit Working Group: Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the internet-policy paper. http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria. htm (accessed October 5, 2006)
|
2 |
Bernstam EV, Shelton DM, Walji M, Meric-Bernstam F. 2005. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: What can our patients actually use? Inter J Med Infor 74: 13-19
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Kang HK, Kan MH, Yu KH, Ly SY. 2004. Monitoring of on-line nutrition information-analysis of meta data. Korean J Nutr 37: 688-700
|
4 |
Kitzinger J. 1995. Qualitative research. Introducing focus group. Br Med J 311: 299-302
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. 2002. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 287: 2691-2700
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Fricke M, Fallis D, Jones M, Luszko GM. 2005. Consumer health information on the internet about carpel tunnel syndrome: Indicators of accuracy. Am J Med 118: 168-174
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Fox S, Rainie L. 2002. Vital decision: How internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet and American life project. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/59/report_display.asp (accessed October 5, 2006)
|
8 |
Rigby M, Forsstrom J, Roberts R, Wyatt J. 2001. Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services. Br Med J 323: 552-556
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. 2005. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. Br Med J 324: 569-572
|
10 |
Fox S. 2005. Health information online. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/ (accessed October 5, 2006)
|
11 |
Lee SY, Kim JH, Paik HY, Ji GE, Pi JE, Hwang YK, Kim SH. 2001. Development of criteria to assess the quality of food and nutrition information on internet. J Kor Home Econo Assoc 39: 51-63
|
12 |
Sohn AR. 2000. Criteria for evaluation health information sites on the internet. J Kor Soc Health Stat 25: 97-107
|
13 |
Wilson P. 2002. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. Br Med J 324: 598-602
DOI
|
14 |
Perez-Lopez FR. 2004. An evaluation of the contents an quality of contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web. Eur Menopause J 49: 276-282
|
15 |
Thakurdesai PA, Kole PL, Pareek RP. 2004. Evaluation of the quality and contents of diabetes mellitus patient education on Internet. Patient Edu Counseling 53: 309-313
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html (accessed October 5, 2006)
|
17 |
Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer JR, Allel RD. 1998. The health on the net code conduct for medical and health websites. Comput Biol Med 28: 603-610
DOI
ScienceOn
|