Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0269

Effects of reducing inclusion rate of roughages by changing roughage sources and concentrate types on intake, growth, rumen fermentation characteristics, and blood parameters of Hanwoo growing cattle (Bos Taurus coreanae)  

Jeon, Seoyoung (Division of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Jeong, Sinyong (Division of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Mingyung (Division of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Seo, Jakyeom (Division of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Kam, Dong Keun (Cargill Agri Purina Inc.)
Kim, Jeong Hoon (Cargill Agri Purina Inc.)
Park, Jaehwa (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
Seo, Seongwon (Division of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.32, no.11, 2019 , pp. 1705-1714 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: Reducing roughage feeding without negatively affecting rumen health is of interest in ruminant nutrition. We investigated the effects of roughage sources and concentrate types on growth performance, ruminal fermentation, and blood metabolite levels in growing cattle. Methods: In this 24-week trial, 24 Hanwoo cattle ($224{\pm}24.7kg$) were fed similar nitrous and energy levels of total mixed ration formulated using two kinds of roughage (timothy hay and ryegrass straw) and two types of concentrate mixes (high starch [HS] and high fiber [HF]). The treatments were arranged in a $2{\times}2$ factorial, consisting of 32% timothy-68% HS, 24% timothy-76% HF, 24% ryegrass-76% HS, and 17% ryegrass-83% HF. Daily feed intakes were measured. Every four weeks, blood were sampled, and body weight was measured before morning feeding. Every eight weeks, rumen fluid was collected using a stomach tube over five consecutive days. Results: The mean dry matter intake (7.33 kg) and average daily gain (1,033 g) did not differ among treatments. However, significant interactions between roughage source and concentrate type were observed for the rumen and blood parameters (p<0.05). Total volatile fatty acid concentration was highest (p<0.05) in timothy-HF-fed calves. With ryegrass as the roughage source, decreasing the roughage inclusion rate increased the molar proportion of propionate and decreased the acetate-to-propionate ratio; the opposite was observed with timothy as the roughage source. Similarly, the effects of concentrate types on plasma total protein, alanine transaminase, Ca, inorganic P, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and creatinine concentrations differed with roughage source (p<0.05). Conclusion: Decreasing the dietary roughage inclusion rate by replacing forage neutral detergent fiber with that from non-roughage fiber source might be a feasible feeding practice in growing cattle. A combination of low-quality roughage with a high fiber concentrate might be economically beneficial.
Keywords
Blood Metabolites; Concentrate Type; Growing Korean Native Cattle (Hanwoo); Roughage Inclusion Rate; Roughage Source; Rumen Parameters;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abdelhadi LO, Santini FJ. Corn silage versus grain sorghum silage as a supplement to growing steers grazing high quality pastures: effects on performance and ruminal fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;127:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.010   DOI
2 Highfill B, Boggs D, Amos H, Crickman J. Effects of high fiber energy supplements on fermentation characteristics and in vivo and in situ digestibilities of low quality fescue hay. J Anim Sci 1987;65:224-34. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.651224x   DOI
3 Poore MH, Moore JA, Swingle RS, Eck TP, Brown WH. Response of lactating Holstein cows to diets carying in fiber source and ruminal starch degradabllity. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:2235-43. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77560-8   DOI
4 Dijkstra J, Mills JA, France J. The role of dynamic modelling in understanding the microbial contribution to rumen function. Nutr Res Rev 2002;15:67-90. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200237   DOI
5 Javaid A, Shahzad MA, Nisa M, Sarwar M. Ruminal dynamics of ad libitum feeding in buffalo bulls receiving different level of rumen degradable protein. Livest Sci 2011;135:98-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.133   DOI
6 Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh AI, Muchenje V, Dzama K, Raats JG. Assessing the nutritional status of beef cattle: current practices and future prospects. Afr J Biotechnol 2007;6:2727-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2436   DOI
7 Agenas S, Heath M, Nixon R, Wilkinson J, Phillips C. Indicators of undernutrition in cattle. Anim Welf 2006;15:149-60.
8 Doornenbal H, Tong A, Murray N. Reference values of blood parameters in beef cattle of different ages and stages of lactation. Can J Vet Res 1988;52:99-105.
9 Sakkinen H. Variation in the blood chemical constituents of reindeer: Significance of season, nutrition and other extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Oulu, Finland: Acta Univesitatis Ouluensis;2005.
10 Reynolds CK, Aikman PC, Lupoli B, Humphries DJ, Beever DE. Splanchnic metabolism of dairy cows during the transition from late gestation through early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2003;86: 1201-17. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73704-7   DOI
11 O'Kelly JC. Comparative studies of lipid metabolism in Zebu and British cattle in a tropical environment. II. Blood lipid levels of cattle on different diets. Aust J Biol Sci 1968;21:1025-32. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9681025   DOI
12 Rowlands G. A review of variations in the concentrations of metabolites in the blood of beef and dairy cattle associated with physiology, nutrition and disease, with particular reference to the interpretation of metabolic profiles. World Rev Nutr Diet 1980;35:172-235   DOI
13 Campanile G, Baruselli PS, Vecchio D, et al. Growth, metabolic status and ovarian function in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) heifers fed a low energy or high energy diet. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;122:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.005   DOI
14 Van Knegsel AT, Van den Brand H, Dijkstra J, Tamminga S, Kemp B. Effect of dietary energy source on energy balance, production, metabolic disorders and reproduction in lactating dairy cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev 2005;45:665-88. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005059   DOI
15 Van Knegsel A, Van den Brand H, Dijkstra J, et al. Effect of glucogenic vs. lipogenic diets on energy balance, blood metabolites, and reproduction in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:3397-409. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-837   DOI
16 Galyean M, Defoor P. Effects of roughage source and level on intake by feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2003;81(Suppl 2):E8-E16. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2E8x
17 Cheng K-J, McAllister T, Popp J, Hristov A, Mir Z, Shin H. A review of bloat in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 1998;76:299-308. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761299x   DOI
18 Maktabi H, Ghasemi E, Khorvash M. Effects of substituting grain with forage or nonforage fiber source on growth performance, rumen fermentation, and chewing activity of dairy calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;221:70-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.024   DOI
19 Ki KS, Park SB, Lim DH, Seo S. Evaluation of the nutritional value of locally produced forage in Korea using chemical analysis and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:355-62. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0626   DOI
20 Eastridge M, Bucci P, Ribeiro C. Feeding equivalent concentrations of forage neutral detergent fiber from alfalfa hay, grass hay, wheat straw, and whole cottonseed in corn silage based diets to lactating cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009;150:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.08.008   DOI
21 Xu J, Hou Y, Yang H, et al. Effects of forage sources on rumen fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in midlactation cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:667-73. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13604   DOI
22 Hsu J-T, Faulkner DB, Garleb KA, Barclay RA, Fahey Jr GC, Berger LL. Evaluation of corn fiber, cottonseed hulls, oat hulls and soybean hulls as roughage sources for ruminants. J Anim Sci 1987;65:244-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.651244x   DOI
23 Weidner SJ, Grant RJ. Soyhulls as a replacement for forage fiber in diets for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1994;77:513-21. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76979-4   DOI
24 Miron J, Yosef E, Maltz E, Halachmi I. Soybean hulls as a replacement of forage neutral detergent fiber in total mixed rations of lactating cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003;106:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00069-5   DOI
25 Adin G, Solomon R, Nikbachat M, et al. Effect of feeding cows in early lactation with diets differing in roughage-neutral detergent fiber content on intake behavior, rumination, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:3364-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2078   DOI
26 Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, et al. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2004;112:29-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006   DOI
27 Seo S, Jeon S, Ha J. Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1381-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0468   DOI
28 National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2000.
29 Lee M, Jeong S, Seo J, Seo S. Changes in the ruminal fermentation and bacterial community structure by a sudden change to a high-concentrate diet in Korean domestic ruminants. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32:92-102. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0262   DOI
30 Jeon S, Sohn K-N, Seo S. Evaluation of feed value of a byproduct of pickled radish for ruminants: analyses of nutrient composition, storage stability, and in vitro ruminal fermentation. J Anim Sci Technol 2016;58:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1   DOI
31 Leng RA. Factors affecting the utilization of 'poor-quality' forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 1990;3:277-303. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19900016   DOI
32 Dado R, Allen M. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1994;77:132-44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76936-8   DOI
33 Seo S, Tedeschi LO, Lanzas C, Schwab CG, Fox DG. Development and evaluation of empirical equations to predict feed passage rate in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;128:67-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.09.014   DOI
34 Salinas-Chavira J, Alvarez E, Montano MF, Zinn RA. Influence of forage NDF level, source and pelletizing on growth performance, dietary energetics, and characteristics of digestive function for feedlot cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;183:106-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.004   DOI
35 Bhatti S, Firkins J. Kinetics of hydration and functional specific gravity of fibrous feed by-products. J Anim Sci 1995;73:1449-58. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7351449x   DOI