Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13167

Effects of Housing Systems on Behaviour, Performance and Welfare of Fast-growing Broilers  

Zhao, Zi-Guang (School of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University)
Li, Jian-Hong (School of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University)
Li, Xiang (School of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University)
Bao, Jun (School of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.27, no.1, 2014 , pp. 140-146 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of different housing systems on behavioral activities, welfare and meat quality of fast-growing broilers. Two hundred broilers were allocated into two housing systems: indoor housing vs indoor with outdoor access. Their general behavior (feeding, drinking, fighting, standing, lying, walking, investigating, dust-bathing and preening) was observed, and tonic immobility, fluctuating asymmetry of legs and wings were measured, and meat quality was analyzed. The results showed that the indoor-housed broilers with outdoor access had significant higher standing, walking, investigating, dust-bathing and preening than those indoor only. However, farming system was not found to significantly affect their feeding, drinking and fighting activities (p>0.05). The value of FA of tibia length of the broilers with outdoor access was significantly lower than that of the indoor-housed birds ($1.57{\pm}1.30$ vs $2.76{\pm}1.40$, p<0.05), while no difference was found for the value of FA in tibia diameter and wing length (p>0.05). TI of the broilers with outdoor access was 165.5 that was significantly higher than that (147.2) of the indoor birds (p<0.05). However, death rate in the outdoor run groups was significantly higher than that of the indoor ones ($2.0{\pm}0.81$ vs $4.0{\pm}0.82$, p<0.05). Meat quality was not affected by the two farming systems. It can be concluded that the results of this study may suggest that the indoor housing with outdoor access provides enriched environment for broilers and facilitates the expression of natural behaviors of the broilers but resulted in poorer performance and higher death rate.
Keywords
Broiler; Housing System; Welfare; Behavior; Meat Quality;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jones, R. B. 2002. Role of comparative psychology in the development of effective environmental enrichment strategies to improve poultry welfare. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 15:77-106.
2 Kells, A., M. S. Dawkins, and Borja, M. Cortina. 2001. The effetcs of a 'freedom food' enrichment on the behaviour of broilers on commercial farm. Anim. Welf. 10:347-356.
3 Kestin, S. C., T. G. Knowles, A. F. Tinch, and N. G. Gregory, 1992. The prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131:190-194.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Leone, E. H. and I. Estevez. 2008. Economic and welfare benefits of environmental enrichment for broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 87:14-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mellen, J. and M. S. MacPhee. 2001. Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future. Zoo Biol. 20:211-226.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Newberry, R. C. 1995. Environmental enrichment Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:229-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Newberry, R. C. 1999. Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63:311-321.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Newberry, R. C., and I. Estevez. 1997. A dynamic approach to the study of environmental enrichment and animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav Sci. 54:53-57.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Nicol, C. J. 1992. Effects of environmental enrichment and gentle handling on behavior and fear responses of transported broilers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33:367-380.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Olsson, I. A. S. and K. Dahlborn. 2002. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of environmental enrichment. Lab. Anim. 36:243-270.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Palmer, A. R. and C. Strobeck. 1992. Fluctuating Asymmetry as a measure of developmental stability: Implications of non-distributions and power of statistical tests. Acta Zool. Fennica 191:57-72. Helsiki 30 June.
12 Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, and J. M. Faure. 2002. Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:767-773.   DOI
13 Campo, J. L., M. T. Prieto, and S. G. Davila. 2008. Effects of housing system and cold stress on heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, fluctuating asymmetry, and tonic immobility duration of chickens. Poult. Sci. 87:621-626.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Cornetto, T. and I. Estevez. 2001b. Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71:141-153.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Fanatico, A. C., L.C. Cavitt, P. B. Pillai, L. C. Cavitt, J. L. Emmert, and C. M. Owens. 2005. Evaluation of slower growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: meat quality. Poult. Sci. 84:1785-1790.   DOI
16 Duncan, I. J. H. 1987. The welfare of farm animals: Anthological approach. Science Progress. 71:317-326.
17 Allen, C. D., D. L. Fletcher, J. K. Northcutt, and S. M. Russel. 1998. The relationship of broiler breast color to meat quality and self-life. Poult. Sci. 77:361-366.   DOI
18 Beattie, V. E., N. Walker, and I. V. Sneddon. 1995. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Anim. Welf. 4:207-220.
19 Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, L. C. Cavitt, J. L. Emmert, J. F. Meullenet, and C. M. Owens. 2006. Evaluation of slower growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: sensory attributes. Poult. Sci. 85:337-343.   DOI
20 Fletcher, D. L. 2002. Poultry meat quality. World's Poult. Sci. J. 58:131-145.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Grigor, P. N., B. O. Hughes, and M. C. Appleby. 1995. Effects of regular handling and exposure to an outside area on subsequent fearfulness and dispersal in domestic hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:47-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hansen, I., B. O. Braastad, J. Storbraten, and M. Tofastrud. 1993 Differences in fearfulness indicated by tonic immobility between laying hens in aviaries and in cages. Anim. Welf. 2: 105-112.
23 Hoop, R. K. and P. A. Rippinger. 1997. The infection with Salmonella gallinarum-pullorum in poultry: experience from Switzerland. Schweiz. Arch. Tierhelkd. 139:485-489.
24 Jones, R. B. and D. Waddington. 1992. Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handing and early environmental enrichment. Anim. Behav. 43:1021-1033.   DOI
25 Hughes, B. O., and A. J. Black. 1974. The effect of environmental factors on activity, selected behaviour patterns and "fear" of fowl in cages and pens. Br. Poult. Sci. 15:375-380.   DOI
26 Jones, R. B. and J. M. Faure. 1981. The effects of regular handling on fear responses in the domestic chick. Behav. Proc. 6:135-143.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Jones, R. B. 1982. Effects of early environmental enrichment upon open-field behavior and timidity in the domestic chick. Dev. Psychobiol. 15:105-111.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Ponte, P. I. P., C. M. C. Rosado, J. P. Crespo, and D. G. Crespo. 2008. Pasture intake improves the performance and meat sensory attributes of free-range broilers. Poult. Sci. 87:71-79.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Permin, A., M. Bisgaard, F. Fransden, M. Pearman, J. Kold, and P. Nansen. 1999. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in different poultry production systems. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:439-443.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Van Poucke, E., A. Van Nuffel, S. Van Dongen, B. Sonck, L. Lens, and F. A. M. Tuyttens. 2007. Experimental stress does not increase fluctuating asymmetry of broiler chickens at slaughter age. Poult. Sci. 86:2110-2116.   DOI
31 Reed, H. J., L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Austin, and N. G. Gregory. 1993. The effect of environmental enrichment during rearing on fear reactions and depopulation trauma in adult caged hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:39-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Zelnter, E. and V. Maurerv. 2009. Welfare of organic poultry. Poultry Welfare Symposium. Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May.
33 Ruis, M. A. W., E. Coenen, J. van Harn, P. Lenskens, and T. B. Rodenburg. 2004. Effect of an outdoor run and natural light on welfare of fast growing broilers. In: Proceedings of the 38th international congress of the ISAE (Ed. L. Hanninen and A. Valros), Helsinki, p. 255.
34 Sanotra, G. S., L. G. Lawson, K. S. Vestergaad, and M. G. Thomasen. 2001. Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness, and tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 4:71-87.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Stricklin, W. R. 1995. Space as environmental enrichment. Lab. Anim. 24:24-29.
36 Wang, K. H., S. R. Shi, T. C. Dou, and H. J. Sun. 2009. Effect of a free-range raising system on growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of slow-growing chicken. Poult. Sci. 88:2219-2223.   DOI   ScienceOn