Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.25

Individual Identification and Breed Allocation with Microsatellite Markers: An Evaluation in Indian Horses  

Behl, Rahul (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Behl, Jyotsna (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Gupta, Neelam (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Gupta, S.C. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Ahlawat, S.P.S. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.20, no.1, 2007 , pp. 25-30 More about this Journal
Abstract
The capability of microsatellite markers for individual identification and their potential for breed assignment of individuals was evaluated in two Indian horse breeds. The strength of these individual assignment methods was also evaluated by increasing the number of loci in increments of five. The probability of identity of two random horses from the two breeds at all twenty five studied loci was as low as $1.08{\times}10^{-32}$ showing their suitability to distinguish between individual horses and their products. In the phylogenetic approach for individual assignment using Nei's genetic distances, 10.81% of horses associated with breed other than the major cluster of the source breed horses when all twenty five microsatellite loci were implemented. Similar results were obtained when the maximum likelihood approach for individual assignment was used. Based on these results it is proposed that, although microsatellite markers may prove very useful for individual identification, their utility for breed assignment of horses needs further evaluation.
Keywords
Individual Identification; Breed Assignment; Microsatellite Markers; Indian Horses;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Behl, R., R. Kaul, N. Sheoran, J. Behl, M. S. Tantia and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Genetic identity of two Indian pig types using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 33:158-159.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Aberle, K. S., H. Hamann, C. Drogemuller and O. Distl. 2004. Genetic diversity in Germen drought horse breeds compared with a group of primitive, riding and wild horses by means of microsatellite DNA markers. Anim. Genet. 35:270-277.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bowling, A. T., M. L. Eggleston-Stott, G. Byrns, R. S. Clark, S. Dileanis and E. Wictum. 1997. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing. Anim. Genet. 28:247-252.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Yang, L., S. H. Zhao, K. Li, Z. Z. Peng and G. W. Montgomery. 1999. Detemination of relationship among five indigenous Chinese goat breeds with six microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 30:452-455.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Singh, M. K., M. P. Yadav and N. T. .Mehta. 2002. Breed characteristics of Marwari and Kathiawari horses. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 72:319-323.
6 Tozaki, T., H. Kokoi, S. Mashima, K. I. Hirota, T. Hasegawa, N. Ishida, N. Miura, N. H. Choi-Miura and M. Tomita. 2001. Population study and validation of paternity testing for Thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1191-1197.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Appl. Biosci. 12:357-358.
8 Pundir, R. K. 2001. Physical and morphological characteristics of Spiti horses. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 71:381-382.
9 Bhat, P. N., P. P. Bhat, B. U. Khan, O. B. Goswami and B. Singh. 1981. Animal genetic resources of India. National Dairy Research Institute Press, Karnal. pp. 87-88.
10 Bjornstad, G. and K. H. Roed. 2001. Breed demarcation and potential for breed allocation of horses assessed by microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 32:59-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Bjornstad, G. and K. H. Roed. 2002. Evaluation of factors affecting breed assignment precision using microsatellite data from horse breeds and simulated breed crosses. Anim. Genet. 33:264-270.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Banks, M. A. and W. Eichert. 2001. WHICHRUN, version 4.1, a computer programme for population assignment based on multilocus genotype data. Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California at Davies. Bodega Bay, CA, USA.
13 Felsenstein, J. 2004. PHYLIP, version 3.6b, phylogeny inference package. Department of Genome science, University of Washington, Seattle.
14 Jin, L. and R. Chakraborty. 1994. Estimation of genetic distance and coefficient of gene diversity from single-probe multilocus DNA fingerprinting data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:120-127.
15 Cho, G. J. and B. W. Cho. 2004. Microsatellite DNA typing using 16 markers for parentage verification of the Korean native horse. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:750-754.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
16 Cornuet, J.-M. S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup and M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genet. 153:1989-2009.
17 MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, P. Cunningham and D. G. Bradley. 1998. Genetic structure of seven cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 29:333-340.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Yeh, F. C., R. Yang and T. Boyle. 1999. POPGENE, version 1.31, a microsoft windows based freeware for population genetics analysis. University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
19 Marklund, S., H. Ellegren, S. Erikson, K. Sandberg and L. Anderson. 1994. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 25:19-23.   DOI
20 Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583-590.
21 Tozaki, T., N. Takezaki, T. Hasegawa, N. Ishida, M. Kurusawa, N. Saitou and H. Mukoyama. 2003. Microsatellite variation in Japanese and Asian horses and their phylogenetic relationship using a European horse outgroup. J. Hered. 94:374-380.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genomics. 22:397-403.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Canon, J., M. L. Checa, C. Carleos, J. L. Vega-Pla, M. Vallejo and S. Dunner. 2000. The genetic structure of Spanish celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim. Genet. 31:39-48.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Bjornstad, G., N. O. Nilsen and K. H. Roed. 2003. Genetic relationship between Mongolian and Norwegian horses? Anim. Genet. 34:55-58.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Blott, S. C., J. L. Williams and C. S. Haley. 1999. discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity. 82:613-619.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Bokonyi, S. 1984. Horse. In: Evolution of Domesticated Animals (Ed. I. L. Mason). Longman, London. pp. 162-173.
27 Bjornstad, G., E. Gunby and K. H. Roed. 2000. Genetic structure of Norwegian horse breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 117:307-317.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Katoch, S. P. K. Dogra, Y. P. Thakur and K. Gupta. 2004. Phenotypic characterization of Spiti horse in its breeding tract-body measurements. Centaur. 20:45-48