Individual Identification and Breed Allocation with Microsatellite Markers: An Evaluation in Indian Horses |
Behl, Rahul
(National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Behl, Jyotsna (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) Gupta, Neelam (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) Gupta, S.C. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) Ahlawat, S.P.S. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) |
1 | Behl, R., R. Kaul, N. Sheoran, J. Behl, M. S. Tantia and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Genetic identity of two Indian pig types using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 33:158-159. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Aberle, K. S., H. Hamann, C. Drogemuller and O. Distl. 2004. Genetic diversity in Germen drought horse breeds compared with a group of primitive, riding and wild horses by means of microsatellite DNA markers. Anim. Genet. 35:270-277. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Bowling, A. T., M. L. Eggleston-Stott, G. Byrns, R. S. Clark, S. Dileanis and E. Wictum. 1997. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing. Anim. Genet. 28:247-252. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Yang, L., S. H. Zhao, K. Li, Z. Z. Peng and G. W. Montgomery. 1999. Detemination of relationship among five indigenous Chinese goat breeds with six microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 30:452-455. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Singh, M. K., M. P. Yadav and N. T. .Mehta. 2002. Breed characteristics of Marwari and Kathiawari horses. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 72:319-323. |
6 | Tozaki, T., H. Kokoi, S. Mashima, K. I. Hirota, T. Hasegawa, N. Ishida, N. Miura, N. H. Choi-Miura and M. Tomita. 2001. Population study and validation of paternity testing for Thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1191-1197. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Appl. Biosci. 12:357-358. |
8 | Pundir, R. K. 2001. Physical and morphological characteristics of Spiti horses. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 71:381-382. |
9 | Bhat, P. N., P. P. Bhat, B. U. Khan, O. B. Goswami and B. Singh. 1981. Animal genetic resources of India. National Dairy Research Institute Press, Karnal. pp. 87-88. |
10 | Bjornstad, G. and K. H. Roed. 2001. Breed demarcation and potential for breed allocation of horses assessed by microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 32:59-65. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Bjornstad, G. and K. H. Roed. 2002. Evaluation of factors affecting breed assignment precision using microsatellite data from horse breeds and simulated breed crosses. Anim. Genet. 33:264-270. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Banks, M. A. and W. Eichert. 2001. WHICHRUN, version 4.1, a computer programme for population assignment based on multilocus genotype data. Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California at Davies. Bodega Bay, CA, USA. |
13 | Felsenstein, J. 2004. PHYLIP, version 3.6b, phylogeny inference package. Department of Genome science, University of Washington, Seattle. |
14 | Jin, L. and R. Chakraborty. 1994. Estimation of genetic distance and coefficient of gene diversity from single-probe multilocus DNA fingerprinting data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:120-127. |
15 | Cho, G. J. and B. W. Cho. 2004. Microsatellite DNA typing using 16 markers for parentage verification of the Korean native horse. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:750-754. 과학기술학회마을 DOI |
16 | Cornuet, J.-M. S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup and M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genet. 153:1989-2009. |
17 | MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, P. Cunningham and D. G. Bradley. 1998. Genetic structure of seven cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 29:333-340. DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Yeh, F. C., R. Yang and T. Boyle. 1999. POPGENE, version 1.31, a microsoft windows based freeware for population genetics analysis. University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada. |
19 | Marklund, S., H. Ellegren, S. Erikson, K. Sandberg and L. Anderson. 1994. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 25:19-23. DOI |
20 | Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583-590. |
21 | Tozaki, T., N. Takezaki, T. Hasegawa, N. Ishida, M. Kurusawa, N. Saitou and H. Mukoyama. 2003. Microsatellite variation in Japanese and Asian horses and their phylogenetic relationship using a European horse outgroup. J. Hered. 94:374-380. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genomics. 22:397-403. DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Canon, J., M. L. Checa, C. Carleos, J. L. Vega-Pla, M. Vallejo and S. Dunner. 2000. The genetic structure of Spanish celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim. Genet. 31:39-48. DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Bjornstad, G., N. O. Nilsen and K. H. Roed. 2003. Genetic relationship between Mongolian and Norwegian horses? Anim. Genet. 34:55-58. DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Blott, S. C., J. L. Williams and C. S. Haley. 1999. discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity. 82:613-619. DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Bokonyi, S. 1984. Horse. In: Evolution of Domesticated Animals (Ed. I. L. Mason). Longman, London. pp. 162-173. |
27 | Bjornstad, G., E. Gunby and K. H. Roed. 2000. Genetic structure of Norwegian horse breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 117:307-317. DOI ScienceOn |
28 | Katoch, S. P. K. Dogra, Y. P. Thakur and K. Gupta. 2004. Phenotypic characterization of Spiti horse in its breeding tract-body measurements. Centaur. 20:45-48 |