Breast augmentation surgery using an inframammary fold incision in Southeast Asian women: Patient-reported outcomes |
Randquist, Charles
(Victoriakliniken)
Por, Yong Chen (DREAM Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery) Yeow, Vincent (DREAM Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery) Maglambayan, Joy (Allergan Singapore Pte Ltd) Simonyi, Susan (Allergan Singapore Pte Ltd) |
1 | Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, et al. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 2010;10:e43. |
2 | Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, et al. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:1954-61. DOI |
3 | Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E, et al. Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast sur- gery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:597-602. DOI |
4 | Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, et al. Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q: augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:846-53. DOI |
5 | Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69:149-62. DOI |
6 | Alderman A, Pusic A, Murphy DK. Prospective analysis of primary breast augmentation on body image using the BREAST-Q: results from a nationwide study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:954e-960e. DOI |
7 | Sarwer DB, LaRossa D, Bartlett SP, et al. Body image con- cerns of breast augmentation patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:83-90. DOI |
8 | Bengtson BP. The Natrelle 401 highly cohesive form-stable gel implant for primary breast augmentation. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, et al., editors. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017. p. 1346-65. |
9 | Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study re- sults at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32:709-17. DOI |
10 | International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2011 [Internet]. Hanover, NH; c2012 [cited Oct 28, 2016]. Available from https://www.isaps.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/10/ISAPS-Results-Procedures-2011-1. pdf. |
11 | Adams WP Jr, Small KH. The process of breast augmenta- tion with special focus on patient education, patient selec- tion and implant selection. Clin Plast Surg 2015;42:413-26. DOI |
12 | International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2015 [Internet]. Hanover, NH; c2016 [cited Oct 28, 2016]. Available from https://www.isaps.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/10/2016-ISAPS-Results-1.pdf. |
13 | Zelken J, Cheng MH. Asian breast augmentation: a system- atic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e555. DOI |
14 | Cheng MH, Huang JJ. Augmentation mammaplasty in Asian women. Semin Plast Surg 2009;23:48-54. DOI |
15 | Heden P, Brown MH, Luan J, et al. Delphi study consensus recommendations: patient selection and preoperative plan- ning measurements for Natrelle 410. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e556. DOI |
16 | Kim YJ, Kim YW, Cheon YW. Prevention of implant malpo- sition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:407-13. DOI |
17 | Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA, Nader M, et al. Preoperative assessment tool for the planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:878-86. DOI |
18 | Schwartz MR. Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra’s silicone gel shaped implants in primary and revision breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(1 Suppl):18S- 27S. DOI |
19 | Randquist C. My confession after 14 years of experience with form stable high cohesive silicone gel implants. Can J Plast Surg 2010;18:116. DOI |
20 | Randquist C, Gribbe O. Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. In: Hall-Findlay EJ, Evans GR, Kim KK, editors. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. New York: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 339-55. |
21 | The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. The scale [Internet]. c2017 [cited Apr 27, 2017]. Available from http://www.posas.org/the-posas/the-scale/. |
22 | Pusic AL, Reavey PL, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring patient outcomes in breast augmentation: introducing the BREAST-Q augmentation module. Clin Plast Surg 2009;36:23-32. DOI |
23 |
Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. A closer look at the |
24 | Alderman AK, Bauer J, Fardo D, et al. Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133:787-95. |
25 | Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, et al. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990;11:256-60. DOI |
![]() |