1 |
Ansari, A., Kamel J. and Sharan J. (2000). A hierarchical Bayesian methodology for treating heterogeneity in structural equation models. Marketing Science, 19, 328-347.
DOI
|
2 |
Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34.
DOI
|
3 |
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
DOI
|
4 |
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
|
5 |
Bollen, K. A. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109-121.
DOI
|
6 |
Bollen, K. A. and Bauer, D. J. (2004). Automating the selection of model-implied instrumental variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 425-452.
DOI
|
7 |
Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J. B., Curran, P. J., Paxton, P. and Chen, F. (2007). Latent variable models under misspecification: Two-stage least squares (2SLS) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators. Sociological Methods and Research, 36, 48-86.
DOI
|
8 |
Boomsma, A. and Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future (Cudeck, R., Du Toit, S. & Sorbom, D., eds), SSI Scientific Software, Chicago, 139-168.
|
9 |
Budaev, S. V. (2010). Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: Caveats and guidelines. Ethology, 116, 472-480.
DOI
|
10 |
Chen, F., Bollen, K., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J. and Kirby, J. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 468-508.
DOI
|
11 |
Choi, H. S., Kwon, Y. J. and Ha, J. C. (2013). Study of university students' perceptions on participation in elections via structural equation model-Focusing on K university students. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 379-390.
DOI
|
12 |
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
|
13 |
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling Plans, SIAM, Philadelphia.
|
14 |
Fan, X. and Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
DOI
|
15 |
Fox, J. (2006). Structural equation modeling with the sem package in R . Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 465-486.
DOI
|
16 |
Grace, J. B., Anderson, T. M., Olff, H. and Scheiner, S. M. (2010). On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecological Monographs, 80, 67-87.
DOI
|
17 |
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A. and Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23, 519-529.
DOI
|
18 |
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-151.
DOI
|
19 |
Hayduk, L., Cummings, G. G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H. and Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! testing! one, two three-Testing the theory in structural equation models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 841-850.
DOI
|
20 |
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2001). The elements of statistical learning; Data mining, inference, and prediction, Sringer-Verlag, New York.
|
21 |
Henseler, J. (2012). Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 402-413.
DOI
|
22 |
Hoerl, A. E. and Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12, 55-67.
DOI
|
23 |
Hong, Y., Jang, G. and Choi, C. (2016). Life satisfaction and self-esteem of children from low-income class: Testing mediation model of depression. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 27, 179-189.
DOI
|
24 |
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A. and Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233-244.
DOI
|
25 |
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B. and Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218.
DOI
|
26 |
Jung, S. (2013). Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage least-squares estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 75-81.
DOI
|
27 |
Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions, 2nd ed., Sage, California.
|
28 |
Lee, S. (2007). Problems caused by model equivalence in developing and testing models. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20, 125-146.
|
29 |
MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P. and Jarvis, C. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioural and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730.
DOI
|
30 |
McArdle, J. J. and McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234-251.
DOI
|
31 |
Min, D. K. and Choi, M. K. (2016). How depression affects girls who experienced violence in home or at school: Using mixed model. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 27, 101-110.
DOI
|
32 |
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. and Howell, R. (2000). The Performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and non-normality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557-595.
DOI
|
33 |
Sideridis, G., Simos, P., Papanicolaou, A. and Fletcher, J. (2014). Using structural equation modeling to assess functional connectivity in the brain: Power and sample size considerations. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 74, 733-758.
DOI
|
34 |
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. and Baumgartner, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 195-202.
DOI
|
35 |
Tenenhaus, M., Pages, J., Ambroisine, L. and Guinot, C. (2005). PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgments and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 315-325.
DOI
|
36 |
Tenenhaus, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for small samples, HEC school of management (GRECHEC).
|