Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.368

Early experience and favorable clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease in Korea  

Kwon, Osung (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Ahn, Jung-Min (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Kang, Do-Yoon (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Kang, Se Hun (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Lee, Pil Hyung (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Kang, Soo-Jin (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Lee, Seung-Whan (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Kim, Young-Hak (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Lee, Cheol Whan (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Park, Seong-Wook (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Park, Duk-Woo (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Park, Seung-Jung (Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean journal of internal medicine / v.33, no.5, 2018 , pp. 922-932 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background/Aims: Compared with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) may further improve long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease. We report our early experience with BVS in Korea. Methods: We evaluated 105 consecutive patients with BVS implanted at Asan Medical Center, Korea between October 21, 2015 and June 3, 2016. Angiographic results, and in-hospital and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: A total of 134 BVS were implanted to treat 115 lesions. The mean age was $62{\pm}10.5years$; 85 patients (81%) were males, 26 patients (25%) were presented with acute coronary syndrome. Among 115 lesions treated with BVS, 76 (66.1%) were B2/C type, 27 (23.5%) were bifurcation lesions, and four (3.5%) were chronic total occlusion. Pre-dilation and post-dilation using high-pressure non-compliant balloon was performed in 104 lesions (90.4%) and 113 lesions (98.2%), respectively. During the procedure, intravascular imaging was used for all patients (100%; intravascular ultrasound 89 and optical coherence tomography 40 patients). Device success rate was 100%. In-segment and in-scaffold acute again were $1.1{\pm}0.6$ and $1.3{\pm}0.5mm$, respectively. Periprocedural myocardial infraction occurred in four patients (3.8%). No deaths, stent thrombosis, or urgent revascularizations occurred either during hospitalization or the follow-up period. Conclusions: In this single-center experience, implantation of BVS with intravascular imaging support was feasible and early clinical outcomes were excellent. Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of BVS and its feasibility in clinical use for a broader range of lesions is warranted.
Keywords
Absorbable implants; Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds; Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lane JP, Perkins LE, Sheehy AJ, et al. Lumen gain and restoration of pulsatility after implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold in porcine coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:688-695.   DOI
2 Serruys PW, Ormiston JA, Onuma Y, et al. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods. Lancet 2009;373:897-910.   DOI
3 Kraak RP, Hassell ME, Grundeken MJ, et al. Initial experience and clinical evaluation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in real-world practice: the AMC Single Centre Real World PCI Registry. EuroIntervention 2015;10:1160-1168.   DOI
4 Capodanno D, Gori T, Nef H, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicenter GHOSTEU registry. EuroIntervention 2015;10:1144-1153.   DOI
5 Kawamoto H, Panoulas VF, Sato K, et al. Impact of strut width in periprocedural myocardial infarction: a propensity-matched comparison between bioresorbable scaffolds and the first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:900-909.
6 Ishibashi Y, Muramatsu T, Nakatani S, et al. Incidence and potential mechanism(s) of post-procedural rise of cardiac biomarker in patients with coronary artery narrowing after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold or everolimus-eluting metallic stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1053-1063.   DOI
7 Teeuwen K, Hubbers S, Tijssen JG, Van Der Heyden JA, Rensing BJ, Suttorp MJ. Experiences with the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in all comers: The St. Antonius Hospital single centre registry. Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol 2015;10:1-6.   DOI
8 Holmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Garg S, et al. Stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1357-1365.   DOI
9 Colombo A, Ruparelia N. Who is thrombogenic: the scaffold or the doctor? Back to the future! JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:25-27.   DOI
10 Authors/Task Force members, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2541-2619.   DOI
11 Allahwala UK, Cockburn JA, Shaw E, Figtree GA, Hansen PS, Bhindi R. Clinical utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the optimisation of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold deployment during percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 2015;10:1154-1159.   DOI
12 Lee SW, Park SW, Hong MK, et al. Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: impact on stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1833-1837.   DOI
13 Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y. From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? Eur Heart J 2012;33:16-25.   DOI
14 Marroquin OC, Selzer F, Mulukutla SR, et al. A comparison of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for off-label indications. N Engl J Med 2008;358:342-352.   DOI
15 Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Bioresorbable scaffold: the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary and peripheral revascularization? Circulation 2011;123:779-797.   DOI
16 Otsuka F, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, et al. Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans. Circulation 2014;129:211-223.   DOI
17 Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Dudek D, et al. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:43-54.   DOI
18 Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1905-1915.   DOI
19 Gao R, Yang Y, Han Y, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB China Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2298-2309.   DOI
20 Kimura T, Kozuma K, Tanabe K, et al. A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3332-3342.   DOI
21 Stone GW, Gao R, Kimura T, et al. 1-Year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis. Lancet 2016;387:1277-1289.   DOI
22 Cassese S, Byrne RA, Ndrepepa G, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2016;387:537-544.   DOI
23 Iqbal J, Onuma Y, Ormiston J, Abizaid A, Waksman R, Serruys P. Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future. Eur Heart J 2014;35:765-776.   DOI
24 Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1563-1570.   DOI
25 Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-2351.   DOI
26 Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Popma JJ, et al. Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial. Am Heart J 2015;170:641-651.   DOI