Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2022.38.5.169

Design Ground Motion Selecting Method for Nonlinear Time History Analysis by Correlating Fundamental Period and Mean Period  

Kim, Kang San (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
Choi, Insub (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
Kim, JunHee (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea / v.38, no.5, 2022 , pp. 169-176 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) has become a considerable option for seismic design. For complex and irregular structures, a NTHA derives realistic displacement that leads to efficient seismic design. However, regions without sufficient earthquake records face issues when determining which earthquake is most suitable for their site condition. In this study, a selection method for design ground motion used in the nonlinear time history analysis was developed by correlating the fundamental period of buildings and the mean period of ground motions. From existing literature, the relationship between the maximum displacement and the fundamental period normalized to the mean period was determined. A total of 200 NTHA was performed to establish the relationship of reinforced concrete (RC) piloti-type structures by statistically correlating them between the fundamental period and the mean period with the maximum displacement. By statistical means from RC piloti structure's NTHA distribution, the regression curve and the 70% confidence interval were derived. This correlation determined the period ratio range category where the earthquake's NTHA displacements were compared to the pseudo displacement of the design spectrum method. For the suggested piloti prototype model, it was concluded that the period ratio of 0.75-1.5 was a category that could determine whether the earthquake's NTHA displacement was greater or less than the linear elastic response spectrum method.
Keywords
Design Ground Motions; Fundamental Period; Mean Period; Nonlinear Time History Analysis; Seismic Performance Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 KDS. (2019). Seismic Building Design Code (KDS 41 17 00), Korean Design Standard.
2 Hickey, J., & Broderick, B. (2019). Influence of mean period of ground motion on inelastic drift demands in cbfs designed to eurocode 8. Engineering Structures, 182, 172-184.   DOI
3 Karavasilis, T. L., Bazeos, N., & Beskos, D. E. (2007). Estimation of seismic drift and ductility demands in planar regular X-braced steel frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(15), 2273-2289.   DOI
4 Katsanos, E. I., & Sextos, A. G. (2018). Structure - specific selection of earthquake ground motions for the reliable design and assessment of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(2), 583-611.   DOI
5 Ha, S. J., Han, S. W., & Ji, H. W. (2017). Assessment of Code-specified Ground Motion Selection Criteria with Accurate Selection and Scaling Methods-I Ground Motion Selection. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 21(4), 171-179.   DOI
6 Rathje, E. M., Abrahamson, N. A., & Bray, J. D. (1998). Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2), 150-159.   DOI
7 Shome, N. (1999). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.
8 Reyes, J. C., & Kalkan, E. (2012). How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure?. Earthquake Spectra, 28(3), 1223-1242.   DOI
9 Chopra, A. K., & Chintanapakdee, C. (2004). Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9), 1309-1319.   DOI
10 Sohn, J. H., Choi, I., & Kim, J. (2020). Effect of vertical irregularity on displacement concentration in building seismic design based on linear analysis. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(6), 193-200.   DOI
11 Sohn, J. H., Choi, I., & Kim, J. (2022). Development of limit states for seismic fragility assessment of piloti-type structures verified with observed damage data. Engineering Structures, 251, 113562.   DOI
12 Shin, J. W., Oh, S. H., & Yang, W. J. (2021). Review of Selection Technique of Design Seismic Wave According to Seismic Design Standards for Buildings. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(6), 199-206.   DOI
13 Kumar, M., Castro, J. M., Stafford, P. J., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2011). Influence of the mean period of ground motion on the inelastic dynamic response of single and multi degree of freedom systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(3), 237-256.   DOI
14 Karavasilis, T. L., Seo, C. Y., & Makris, N. (2011). Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulselike earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(5), 600-606.   DOI
15 Ha, S. J. (2020). An Evaluation on Seismic Design Criteria for Ground Motions Selection for Three-Dimensional Time History Analysis of Structures. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(7), 139-146.   DOI
16 Elenas, A., & Meskouris, K. (2001). Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Engineering Structures, 23(6), 698-704.   DOI