Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17662/ksdim.2021.17.3.027

Graph-based Mixed Heuristics for Effective Planning  

Park, Byungjoon (서일대학교 소프트웨어공학과)
Kim, Wantae (서일대학교 정보통신공학과)
Kim, Hyunsik (서일대학교 소프트웨어공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management / v.17, no.3, 2021 , pp. 27-37 More about this Journal
Abstract
Highly informative heuristics in AI planning can help to a more efficient search a solutions. However, in general, to obtain informative heuristics from planning problem specifications requires a lot of computational effort. To address this problem, we propose a Partial Planning Graph(PPG) and Mixed Heuristics for solving planning problems more efficiently. The PPG is an improved graph to be applied to can find a partial heuristic value for each goal condition from the relaxed planning graph which is a means to get heuristics to solve planning problems. Mixed Heuristics using PPG requires size of each graph is relatively small and less computational effort as a partial plan generated for each goal condition compared to the existing planning graph. Mixed Heuristics using PPG can find partial interactions for each goal conditions in an effective way, then consider them in order to estimate the goal state heuristics. Therefore Mixed Heuristics can not only find interactions for each goal conditions more less computational effort, but also have high accuracy of heuristics than the existing max and additive heuristics. In this paper, we present the PPG and the algorithm for computing Mixed Heuristics, and then explain analysis to accuracy and the efficiency of the Mixed Heuristics.
Keywords
Classical Planning; Delete Relaxation; Domain-independent Heuristic; Relaxed Planning Graph; Partial Planning Graph;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이석준.김인철, "행위 온톨로지로부터 로봇 작업 계획 생성," 제어로봇시스템학회, 제어로봇시스템학회논문지, 제23권, 제8호, 2017, pp.650-660.   DOI
2 B. Bonet, and H. Geffner, "Planning as Heuristic Search,"Artifical Intelligence, 2001, pp.5-33.
3 J. Hoffmann and B. Nebel, "The FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation through Heuristic Search:, Journal of AI Research, vol14, 2001, pp.253-302.
4 D. Cai, M. Yin and J. Wang, "Improving Relaxed Plan-Based Heuristics via Simulated Execution of Relaxed-Plans", ICAPS, 2009.
5 김현식.김인철, "최적 계획수립을 위한 확장된 그래프 기반의 휴리스틱," 한국정보과학회, 정보과학회논문지, 제17권, 제12호, 2011, pp.667-671.
6 김현식, "효율적인 계획 수립을 위한 동작-기반의 휴리스틱," 한국산학기술학회, 한국산학기술학회논문지, 제16권, 제9호, 2015, pp.6290-6296.   DOI
7 S. Russell and P. Norving, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3nd Edition, PeasonEducation, 2010.
8 E. Keyder and H. Geffner, "Set Additive and TSP Heuristics for Planning with Action Costs and Soft Goals", ICAPS, 2007.
9 김완태.김현식, "최적 계획생성을 위한 동작비용 기반의 휴리스틱," 디지털산업정보학회, 디지털산업정보학회논문지, 제13권, 제2호, 2017, pp.27-34.   DOI
10 최병관, "인공지능 객체인식에 관한 파라미터 측정 연구," 디지털산업정보학회, 디지털산업정보학회논문지, 제15권, 제3호, 2019, pp.15-28.   DOI
11 송호정.김현기, "어댑티드 회로 배치 유전자 알고리즘의 설계와 구현," 디지털산업정보학회, 디지털산업정보학회논문지, 제17권, 제2호, 2021, pp.13-20.   DOI
12 A. Blum and M. Furst, "Fast Planning through Planning through Planning Graph Analysis", Artificial Intelligence, vol.90, 1997, pp.281-300.   DOI
13 D. Bryce and S. Kambhampati, "A Tutorial on Planning Graph-Based Reachability Heuristics", AI Magazine, vol.28, no.1, 2006, pp.47-83.
14 O. Marom and B. Rosman, "Utilising Uncertainty for Efficient Learning of Likely-Admissible Heuristics," ICAPS2020, 2020, pp.560-568.
15 P. Haslum and H. Geffner, "Admissible Heuristics for Optimal Planning", AIPS2000, 2000, pp.140-149.