Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.3.160

Antimicrobial effect of toothbrush with light emitting diode on dental biofilm attached to zirconia surface: an in vitro study  

Park, Jong Hew (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
Kim, Yong-Gun (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry)
Um, Heung-Sik (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Si Young (Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Jae-Kwan (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
Chang, Beom-Seok (Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.35, no.3, 2019 , pp. 160-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of a toothbrush with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on periodontitis-associated dental biofilm attached to a zirconia surface by static and dynamic methods. Materials and Methods: Zirconia disks (12 mm diameter, 2.5 mm thickness) were inserted into a 24-well plate (static method) or inside a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biofilm reactor (dynamic method) to form dental biofilms using Streptococcus gordonii and Fusobacterium nucleatum. The disks with biofilm were subdivided into five treatment groups-control, commercial photodynamic therapy (PDT), toothbrush alone (B), brush with LED (BL), and brush with LED+erythrosine (BLE). After treatment, the disks were agitated to detach the bacteria, and the resulting solutions were spread directly on selective agar. The number of viable bacteria and percentage of bacterial reduction were determined from colony counts. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to visualize alterations in bacterial morphology. Results: No significant difference in biofilm formation was observed between dynamic and static methods. A significant difference was observed in the number of viable bacteria between the control and all experimental groups (P < 0.05). The percentage of bacterial reduction in the BLE group was significantly higher than in the other treated groups (P < 0.05). SEM revealed damaged bacterial cell walls in the PDT, BL, and BLE groups, but intact cell walls in the control and B groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest that an LED toothbrush with erythrosine is more effective than other treatments in reducing the viability of periodontitis-associated bacteria attached to zirconia in vitro.
Keywords
biofilm; erythrosine; peri-implant disease; photochemotherapy; toothbrushing;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Franklin MJ, Chang C, Akiyama T, Bothner B. New technologies for studying biofilms. Microbiol Spectr 2015;3. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0016-2014.
2 Song WS, Lee JK, Park SH, Um HS, Lee SY, Chang BS. Comparison of periodontitis-associated oral biofilm formation under dynamic and static conditions. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:219-30.   DOI
3 Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van der Weijden F. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1149-60.   DOI
4 Salvi GE, Ramseier CA. Efficacy of patient-administered mechanical and/or chemical plaque control protocols in the management of peri-implant mucositis. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42 Suppl 16:S187-201.   DOI
5 Park JB, Koh M, Jang YJ, Choi BK, Kim KK, Ko Y. Removing bacteria from rough surface titanium discs with chlorhexidine and additional brushing with dentifrice. Gerodontology 2016;33:28-35.   DOI
6 Schwarz F, John G, Hegewald A, Becker J. Nonsurgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis at zirconia implants: a prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42:783-8.   DOI
7 Song HH, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS, Lee SY, Lee MK. Phototoxic effect of blue light on the planktonic and biofilm state of anaerobic periodontal pathogens. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:72-8.   DOI
8 Habiboallah G, Mahdi Z, Mahbobeh NN, Mina ZJ, Sina F, Majid Z. Bactericidal effect of visible light in the presence of erythrosine on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum compared with diode laser, an in vitro study. Laser Ther 2014;23:263-71.   DOI
9 Metcalf D, Robinson C, Devine D, Wood S. Enhancement of erythrosine-mediated photodynamic therapy of Streptococcus mutans biofilms by light fractionation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:190-2.   DOI
10 Roder HL, Raghupathi PK, Herschend J, Brejnrod A, Knochel S, Sorensen SJ, Burmolle M. Interspecies interactions result in enhanced biofilm formation by co-cultures of bacteria isolated from a food processing environment. Food Microbiol 2015;51:18-24.   DOI
11 Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?-Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38 Suppl 11:178-81.   DOI
12 Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A. Periodontitis, implant loss and periimplantitis. A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e8-e16.
13 Dalago HR, Schuldt Filho G, Rodrigues MA, Renvert S, Bianchini MA. Risk indicators for Peri-implantitis. A cross-sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:144-50.
14 Serino G, Strom C. Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:169-74.   DOI
15 Zhuang LF, Watt RM, Mattheos N, Si MS, Lai HC, Lang NP. Periodontal and peri-implant microbiota in patients with healthy and inflamed periodontal and peri-implant tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:13-21.
16 Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:648-57.   DOI
17 Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ Jr. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:486-505.   DOI
18 Perez-Chaparro PJ, Duarte PM, Shibli JA, Montenegro S, Lacerda Heluy S, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Feres M. The current weight of evidence of the microbiologic profile associated with peri-implantitis: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2016;87:1295-304.   DOI
19 Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8:471-80.   DOI
20 Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:134-44.   DOI
21 Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6.   DOI
22 Holst S, Blatz MB, Hegenbarth E, Wichmann M, Eitner S. Prosthodontic considerations for predictable single-implant esthetics in the anterior maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:89-96.
23 Chen D, Wang N, Gao Y, Shao L, Deng B. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis of the restoration of the maxillary canine with a complex zirconia post system. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1406-15.   DOI
24 Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A, Neumann A, Suerbaum S, Hannig M, Heidenblut T, Bach FW, Stiesch-Scholz M. Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:377-82.   DOI
25 Nascimento CD, Pita MS, Fernandes FHNC, Pedrazzi V, de Albuquerque Junior RF, Ribeiro RF. Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:337-43.
26 Wood S, Metcalf D, Devine D, Robinson C. Erythrosine is a potential photosensitizer for the photodynamic therapy of oral plaque biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:680-4.   DOI
27 Rimondini L, Fare S, Chiesa R, Pedeferri MP, Carrassi A. The effect of composition, wettability and roughness of the substrate on in vivo early bacterial colonization of titanium. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2003;1:131-8.
28 Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
29 Renvert S, Roos-Jansaker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and periimplantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:305-15.
30 Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:13-28.   DOI
31 Dougherty TJ, Gomer CJ, Henderson BW, Jori G, Kessel D, Korbelik M, Moan J, Peng Q. Photodynamic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:889-905.   DOI
32 Lee H, Kim YG, Um HS, Chang BS, Lee SY, Lee JK. Efficacy of an LED toothbrush on a Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm on a sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2018;48:164-73.   DOI
33 Bassetti M, Schar D, Wicki B, Eick S, Ramseier CA, Arweiler NB, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Anti-infective therapy of peri-implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: 12-month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:279-87.
34 Vohra F, Al-Rifaiy MQ, Lillywhite G, Abu Hassan MI, Javed F. Efficacy of mechanical debridement with adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the management of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2014;13:1160-8.   DOI
35 Wang H, Li W, Zhang D, Li W, Wang Z. Adjunctive photodynamic therapy improves the outcomes of peri-implantitis: a randomized controlled trial. Aust Dent J 2019;64:256-62.   DOI
36 Blanc V, Isabal S, Sanchez MC, Llama-Palacios A, Herrera D, Sanz M, Leon R. Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation. J Periodontal Res 2014;49:323-32.   DOI