Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.2.71

Effect of titanium powder on the bond strength of metal heat treatment  

Kim, Sa-Hak (Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University)
Kim, Wook-Tae (Department of Dental Technology and Science, College of Health Science, Shin-Han University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.33, no.2, 2017 , pp. 71-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Ni-Cr alloy does not contain Beryllium, causing the metal compound to form oxides in the furnace but by using Titanium as a chemical catalyst the forming of the oxides can be controlled, and by controlling the impurities formed on the metal surface, the possibility of the Ni-Cr alloy bond strength being increased can be analysed. Materials and Methods: Titanium was used as a chemical catalyst in the porcelain for the oxidation of beryllium-free metal (Ni-Cr) alloy. The T1 group, which does not use Titanium power as a chemical catalyst is a reference model for comparison. The T2 group and T3 group used 10 g and 20 g of Titanium power, respectively. They are fabricated to observe the shear bond strength and surface properties. There was no significance when One-way ANOVA analysis/Tukey Honestly Significant Difference Test was conducted for statistical analysis among groups (P > 0.05). Results: Results of measuring the three-point flexural bond strength of the Ni-Cr alloy and thickness of the oxide film. Experiment T3 using 20 g Titanium chemical catalyst: $39.22{\pm}3.41MPa$ and $6.66{\mu}m$, having the highest bond strength and thinness of oxide film. Experiment T2 using 10 g Titanium chemical catalyst: $34.65{\pm}1.39MPa$ and $13.22{\mu}m$. Experiment T1 using no Titanium chemical catalyst: $32.37{\pm}1.91MPa$ and $22.22{\mu}m$. Conclusion: The T2 and T3 experiments using Titanium chemical catalyst showed higher bond strength for the Ni-Cr alloy and lower thickness of oxide film than experiment T1, and the titanium catalyst being able to increase bond strength was observed.
Keywords
Beryllium; Titanium; chemical catalyst; oxide film; bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wataha JC, Messer RL. Casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:499-512.   DOI
2 McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied dental materials. 7th ed. London; Mass Publishing Co.; 1994. p.71-8.
3 Oshida Y, Fung LW, Isikbay SC. Titanium-porcelain system. Part II: bond strength of fired porcelain on nitrided pure titanium. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7: 13-34.
4 Cascone PJ, Massimo M, Tuccillo JJ. Theoretical interfacial reactions responsible for bonding in porcelain-to-metal systems. Part II-Oxidation of alloys. J Dent Res 1978;57:872.   DOI
5 Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Resin composite restorative materials. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St. Lousis; Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p. 189-212.
6 Morris HF. Properties of cobalt-chromium metal ceramic alloys after heat treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:426-33.   DOI
7 Pierce LH, Goodkind RJ. A status report of possible risks of base metal alloys and their components. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:234-8.   DOI
8 Magnusson B, Bergman M, Bergman B, Soremark R. Nickel allergy and nickel-containing dental alloys. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:163-7.
9 Wang RR, Welsch GE, Monteriro O. Silicon nitride coating on titanium to enable titanium-ceramic bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46:262-70.   DOI
10 Walter M, Reppel PD, Boning K, Freesmeyers WB. Six-year follow-up of titanium and high-gold porcelain-fused-to metal fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:91-6.   DOI
11 Kaus T, Probster L, Weber H. Clinical follow-up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations - three-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:9-15.
12 Sandrock G, Gross K, Thomas G. Effect of Ticatalyst content on the reversible hydrogen storage properties of the sodium alanates. J Alloy Compd 2002;339:299-308.   DOI
13 Matkovic T, Slokar L, Matkovic P. Structure and properties of biomedical Co-Cr-Ti alloys. J Alloy Compd 2006;407:294-8.   DOI
14 Dent RJ, Preston JD, Moffa JP, Caputo A. Effect of oxidation on ceramometal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:59-62.   DOI
15 O'brien WJ, Seluk LW, Fan PL, Saunders DN. Classification of porcelain enamel interfacial fractures. J Dent Res 1976;55:506.   DOI
16 Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:129-35.   DOI
17 Lenz J, Schwarz S, Schwickerath H, Sperner F, Schafer A. Bond strength of metal-ceramic systems in three-point flexure bond test. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:55-64.   DOI
18 Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:429-31.   DOI
19 DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Hathcock PW. An evaluation of the four point flexural test for metalceramic bond strength. J Dent Res 1982;61:1066-9.   DOI
20 Kelly JR, Rose TC. Nonprecious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:363-70.   DOI
21 Bondioli IR, Bottino MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of two porcelains and pure titanium injected into the casting mold at three different temperatures. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:541-7.   DOI
22 Shell JS, Nielsen JP. Study of the bond between gold alloys and porcelain. J Dent Res 1962;41:1424-37.   DOI
23 Okabe T, Hero H, The use of titanium in dentistry. Cell Mater 1995;5:211-30.
24 Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5.   DOI