Browse > Article

Comparison of the Strain on the Alveolar Ridge According to the Occlusal Scheme of Complete Dentures  

Choi, Won-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.26, no.1, 2010 , pp. 1-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the strain on the alveolar ridge in the centric, eccentric and protrusive position according to the occlusal scheme (bilateral balanced occlusion with 33 degree anatomical teeth, group B; monoplane occlusion with non-anatomical teeth, group M; lingualized occlusion with 33 degree anatomical teeth and non-anatomical teeth, group L; of complete dentures. Experimental dentures were set bilateral balanced occlusion, lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion. They are analysed through T-Scan II(Tekscan, Boston, U.S.A) and 1.5mm thick layer was removed from the denture-supporting surface of resin model and then replaced with silicone to simulate resilient edentulous ridge mucosa. A $4{\times}6$ linear strain gauge is attached to the $1^{st}$ premolar and $1^{st}$ molar area. The strain values are recorded according to the occlusal scheme in the centric, eccentric and protrusive position after uniformly applying 50 N and 150 N force through a Universal Testing Machine(instron$^{(R)}$ 5567, Bluehill 2.0 software ,U.S.A.) with the models mounted in the articulator. When performing centric and protrusive occlusion, the three groups of occlusal scheme were compared in the anterior region and in the posterior region. The strains of each group were also compared in the working side and in the non-working side during eccentric excursion. It was observed that the strain in the bilateral balanced occlusion showed a higher value than the lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in every position except the non-working side. However, during the eccentric movement the strain value in the non-working side showed the lowest value in the bilaterally balanced occlusion. The strain change amount from the working side or centric occlusion to non-working side and also the strain variation rate within the non-working side showed the highest value in bilateral balanced occlusion.
Keywords
bilateral balanced occlusion; lingualized occlusion; monoplane occlusion; strain; T-Scan II;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Michael CG, et. al. Biting strength and chewing forces in complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:549-53   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers : A mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27(2):120-32   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Francesco OL. et. al. New method for analyzing complete denture occlusion using the center of force concept: A case report J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:519-23   DOI   ScienceOn
4 H. Uchida, et. al. Measurement in vivo of masticatory mucosal thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic diagnostic equipment, J Dent Rec 1989;68:95-100.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mizui M, Nabershima F, Tosa J, Tanaka M, Kawazoe T. Quantitative analysis of occlusal balance in intercuspal position using the T-Scan System. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:62-71
6 Boening KW, Walter MH. Computer-aided evaluation of occlusal load in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:339-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kydd W. Complete denture base deformation with varied occlusal tooth forms. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:714   DOI
8 Swoope CC Jr, Kydd. WL. The effect of cusp form and occlusal area in denture base deformation. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:34-43   DOI
9 Sharry JJ, et. al. Influence of artificial tooth forms on bone deformation beneath complete dentures. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 253-66   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Nogueira SS. Russi S. Compagnoni MA, De. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:386-8   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kapur KK, Yurkstas AA. An evaluation of centric relation records obtained by various techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1957;7:770-86   DOI
12 Campbell RL A comparartive study of the resorption of the alveolar ridges in denture-wearers and nondenture wearers. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;60:143-53   DOI
13 Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II : stability. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:165-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Neufeld, JO. Changes in the trabecular pattern of the mandible following the loss of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:685   DOI
15 Ortman H. The role of occlusion in preservation and prevention in complete prosthodontics. J Prosthet Den 1971;25(3):121-38   DOI
16 Wright C. Evaluation of the factors necessary to develop stsbility in mandibular dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16(3):414-30   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sears V. Thirty years of non-anatomic teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:596   DOI
18 Jozefowicz W. The influence of wearing dentures on residual ridges-A comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24(2):137-44   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Atwood, DA. Clinical. cephalometric, and densitometric study of the reduction of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26(3):280-95   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Tallgren A. Alveolar bone loss in denture wearers as related to facial morphology. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28(2):251-70   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Clough HE, et. al. A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete denture. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:176-79   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Schultz AW. Comfort and chewing efficiency in dentures. J Procthet Dent 1951;1:38-48   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Thompson MJ. Efficiency as related to cusp form in denture prosthesis. J Am Dent Assoc 1937;24:207-19
24 Stephen LO, et. al. Photoelastic comparison of posterior denture occlusions. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:18-22   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Kelsey CC. Alveolar bone resorption under complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25(3):152-161   DOI
26 Ortman HR. Complete denture occlusion. In: Winkler S(ed). Essentials of Complete Denture Prosthodontics, ed 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:217-90
27 Payne SH. A comparative study of posterior occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:661-65   DOI
28 Trapozzano VR, Lazzari JB. An experimental study of the testing of occlusal patterns on the same denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:440-57   DOI
29 Heartwell CM Jr, Rahn AO. Tooth Arrangement. Syllabus of Complete Dentures, ed 4. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger,1986:327-42
30 Boucher CO. Arrangement of posterior teeth for functional harmony. In: Boucher CO, Hickey JC, Zarb GA(eds). Prosdontic Treatment for Edentulous Patient,ed7. St Louis: Mosby,1975: 413-46.
31 Inoue S, et. al. An in vitro study of influence of occlusal scheme on pressure distribution of complete denture supporting tissues. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:179-87
32 Renner RP. Practical complete denture occlusion. In: Renner RP(ed). Complete Dentures. A Guide for Patient Treatment. New York: Masson, 1981:120-51
33 Ohguri T, et. al. Influence of occlusal scheme on the pressure distribution under a complete denture. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:353-8.
34 Pound E. Utilizing speech to simplify a personalized denture service. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:586-600   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Stromberg WR. A Method of Measuring Forces of Denture Bases Against Supporting Tissues, J Prosthet Dent 1955;5:268-88   DOI
36 Johnson W. A study of stress distribution in complete upper dentures. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1965;15:371
37 Maeda Y, Wood WW. Finite element method stimulation of bone resorption beneath a complete denture. J Dent Res 1989;68:1370-3   DOI   ScienceOn