Browse > Article

The Study of Bone Healing Response According to the Various Surfaces of the Implant in the Mandible of the Mature Dog  

Lim, Hyun-Pil (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Yong-Hak (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Vang, Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Yang, Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Park, Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Choi, Hong-Ran (Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.25, no.2, 2009 , pp. 125-137 More about this Journal
Abstract
There are many reports that these implant surface treatments may affect to cellular reaction in the surface of implant. This study was done by installing the 8 type implant with the variable surface treatment, used or developed, in the mandible of the mature dog to evaluate how the method of surface treatment of the implant can affect to the bone healing by analyzing histologically and histomorphometrically and find out bone healing appearance periodically after installing implant. By using the 8 type implants which have the different surface treatment, 72 implants were installed on the mandible of 9 mature dogs, and 3 dogs were sacrificed on every 2, 4, 8 weeks. After making bone fragment by cutting and managing, we analyzed histologically, then compared with BIC(Bone to implant contact) for the histomorphometrical analysis. In the result of histological analysis, there was large amount of bone formation in good state on the adjacent area of implant in the 2 weeks testing group. At 4 weeks, although there was general bone formation, the new bone was separated with the basal bone. At 8 weeks, the new bone became matured and connected tightly to the basal bone. There was no difference in the each surface of 8 implants. In the result of histomorphometrical analysis, 2 weeks group had considerably lower value than 4 and 8 weeks group, and there was no difference between 4 and 8 weeks group. There was no difference in the each surface treatment of implants.
Keywords
bone to implant contact(BIC); implant surface; surface treatment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Park CJ. A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis SNUDH Dept of Pros. Unpublished 2003
2 Misch CE. Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral IMplantol 1990;6:23-31
3 Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D, Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-333
5 Papalexiou V, Novaes AB Jr, Grisi MFM, Souza SSLS. Influence of implant microstructure on the dynamics bone healing round immediate implants placed into periodontally infected sites. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:44-53   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Sennerby L. Roos J. RFA: Measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compendium 1998;19: 493-502
7 Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L. Araricio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodontics 1998;11: 269-275
8 Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Fujibayashi S, Makamura T. Structural dependence of apatite formation on titania gels in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;64:164-70
9 Meredith, N., Shagaldi, F., alleyne, D., Sennerby, L., Cawley, P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997b;8:234-243   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:251-262   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Li D, Rerguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical coparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the achined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:325-332   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Parel SM, Triplett RG. Immediate fixture placement: a treatment planning alternative. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5(4):337-345
13 Sennerby L. Friberg B. Linden B. Jemt T. Meredith N. A comparison of implant bone using RFA:European commission demonstration Project. RFA Symposium. 2002 Sweden
14 Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Dent M, Faulkner G. Grace M. Assessment of the Periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:221-229
15 Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants: A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5(4):202-206   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Webster TJ, Schandler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanics of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-310   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sennerby L. Roos J Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated Prosthodont 1998;11:408- 420
18 Sun L. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: A review. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58: 570-592   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2003;5(Suppl 1):88-98   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblast on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-10   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Schatzker J, Horne JG, Sumnet SG. The effect of movement on holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop 1975;111:257-262   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Tal H. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged implants.Ⅱ: Histopathology and histomorphometry of non-perforated mucosa covering submerged implants. J Periodontol 2000;71:1231-1235   DOI   ScienceOn