Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2020.25.02.059

Pipe Leak Detection System using Wireless Acoustic Sensor Module and Deep Auto-Encoder  

Yeo, Doyeob (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI))
Lee, Giyoung (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI))
Lee, Jae-Cheol (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI))
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a pipe leak detection system through data collection using low-power wireless acoustic sensor modules and data analysis using deep auto-encoder. Based on the Fourier transform, we propose a low-power wireless acoustic sensor module that reduces data traffic by reducing the amount of acoustic sensor data to about 1/800, and we design the system that is robust to noise generated in the audible frequency band using only 20kHz~100kHz frequency signals. In addition, the proposed system is designed using a deep auto-encoder to accurately detect pipe leaks even with a reduced amount of data. Numerical experiments show that the proposed pipe leak detection system has a high accuracy of 99.94% and Type-II error of 0% even in the environment where high frequency band noise is mixed.
Keywords
Wireless; Ultrasonic wave; Low-power; Deep auto-encoder; Pipe leak detection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 D.-B. Yoon, S.-S. Moon, and B.-S. Yang, A Study on Acoustic Signal Processing Method for Detecting Small Leak of Piping System, Proceedings of the Domestic conference on the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, pp. 139-139, Hoengseong, Korea, Oct. 2016.
2 J.-H. Bae, D. Yeo, D.-B. Yoon, S.W. Oh, G.J. Kim, N.S. Kim, and C.S. Pyo, Deep-Learning-Based Pipe Leak Detection Using Image-Based Leak Features, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2361-2365, Athens, Greece, Oct. 2018.
3 D. Yeo, J.-H. Bae, and J.-C. Lee, “Unsupervised Learning-Based Pipe Leak Detection using Deep Auto-Encoder,” Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 21-27, September 2019. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2019.24.09.021
4 C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich, Going Deeper with Convolutions, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1-9, Boston, USA, Jun. 2015.
5 K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), pp. 1-14, San Diego, USA, May 2015.
6 K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1-12, Las Vegas, USA, Jun. 2016.
7 G. Huang, Z. Liu, L.V.D. Maaten, and K. Weinberger, Densely Connected Convolutional Networks, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2261-2269, Hawaii, USA, Jul. 2017.
8 S. Hpchreiter and J. Schmidhuber, "Long short-term memory," Neural computation, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735   DOI
9 V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Graves, I. Antonoglou, D. Wierstra, and M. Riedmiller, "Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602, 2013.
10 V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. P. Lilicrap, T. Harley, and K. Kavukcuoglu, "Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01783, 2016.
11 T. Luo and S.G. Nagarajan, Distributed Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoder Neural Networks in WSN for IoT, Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1-6, Kansas City, USA, May 2018.
12 R. Chalapathy and S. Chawla, "Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A survey," arXiv preprint arXiv:1901:03407, 2019.
13 G. Cybenko, “Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function,” Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 303-314, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551274   DOI
14 A. Borghesi, A. Bartolini, M. Lombardi, M. Milano, and L. Benini, Anomaly detection using autoencoders in high performance computing systems, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 9428-9433, Hawaii, USA, Jul. 2019.
15 J. Pereira and M. Silveira, Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Energy Time Series Data using Variational Recurrent Autoencoders with Attention, Proceedings of 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 1275-1282, Orlando, USA, Dec. 2018.
16 ASTM E1002-11(2018), "Standard Practice for Leaks Using Ultrasonics," American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1520/E1002-11R18, www.astm.org.
17 NDIS 3420-2000: "Methods for Leak Test using Ultrasonics," Non-Destructive Inspection Society.
18 Y. Pei, The gas leak locating detection based on the improved ultrasonic transducer array group, Proceedings of the International Conference on Machinery, Materials Science and Engineering Application (MMSE), pp. 251-255, Wuhan, China, June, 2015.