Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2003.36.spc1.007

MAGNETIC HELICITY OF SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS  

SAKURAI T. (National Astronomical Observatory)
HAGINO M. (School of Informatics, Meisei University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society / v.36, no.spc1, 2003 , pp. 7-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
We have studied the magnetic helicity of active regions by using the data from (1) the photo-electric magnetograph of the Okayama Observatory (1983-1995) and (2) the video magnetograph of NAOJ/Mitaka (1992-2000). The latitude distribution of helicity showed a tendency that the regions in the north (south) hemisphere have negative (positive) helicities, respectively, which is already known as the hemispheric sign rule. If we look into the sign of helicity as a function of time, the sign rule was less definite or was reversed sometimes in the sunspot minimum phase. We also studied the relation between the magnetic helicity and the sunspot tilt angles, and found that these two quantities are positively correlated, which is opposite to the expectation of a theoretical model. The implications of this cycle-phase dependence of helicity signs and the correlation between magnetic he Ii city and sunspot tilt angles are discussed.
Keywords
Sun: activity cycle; Sun: magnetic fields; Sun: sunspots;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Longcope, D. W., Fisher, G. H., & Pevtsov, A. A. 1998, Flux-tube twist resulting from helical turbulence: the sigma-effect, ApJ, 507, 417   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Makita, M., Hamana, S., Nishi, K., Shimizu, M., Koyano, H., Sakurai, T., & Komatsu, H. 1985, Observations by the solar vector magnetograph of the Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, PASJ, 37, 561
3 Pevtsov, A. A., Canfield, R. C., & Metcalf, T. R. 1995, Latitudinal variation of helicity of photospheric magnetic fields, ApJ, 440, L109   DOI
4 Sakurai, T., Makita, M., & Shibasaki, K. 1985, Observation of magnetic field vector in solar active regions, in 'Theoretical Problems in High Resolution Solar Physics', ed. H. U. Schmidt, MPA-212 (Max Planck-Institute for Astrophysics, Munich), p.312
5 Sakurai, T., Ichimoto, K., Nishino, Y., Shinoda, K., Noguchi, M., Hiei, E., Li, T., He, F., Lu, H., Ai, G. Zhao, Z., Kawakami, S., & Chae, J. C. 1995, Solar Flare Telescope at Mitaka, PASJ, 47, 81
6 Semel, M., & Skumanich, A. 1998, An ambiguity-free determination of $J_z$ in solar active regions, A&A, 331, 383
7 Tian, L., Bao, S., Zhang, H., & Wang, H. 2001, Relationship in sign between tilt and twist in active region magnetic fields, A&A, 374, 294   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Abramenko, V. I., Wang, T., & Yurchishin, V. B. 1996, Analysis of electric current helicity in active regions on the basis of vector magnetograms, Sol. Phys., 168, 75   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bao, S. D, & Zhang, H. 1998, Patterns of current helicity for the twenty-second solar cycle, ApJ, 496, L43   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hagino, M., & Sakurai, T. 2002, Hemispheric helicity asymmetry in active regions for solar cycle 21-23, in 'Multi-Wavelength Observations of Coronal Structure and Dynamics', COSPAR Colloquia Series Vol.l3, ed. P. C. H. Martens and D. P. Kauffman (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), p.148