Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.153

Evaluation of the alignment efficiency of nickel-titanium and copper-nickel-titanium archwires in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment over a 12-week period: A single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial  

Aydin, Burcu (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University)
Senisik, Neslihan Ebru (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University)
Koskan, Ozgur (Departments of Animal Science, Genetics, and Biometrics, Faculty of Agriculture, Suleyman Demirel University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.48, no.3, 2018 , pp. 153-162 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare the alignment efficiency and intermaxillary arch dimension changes of nickel-titanium (NiTi) or copper-nickel-titanium (CuNiTi) round archwires with increasing diameters applied sequentially to the mandibular arch. Methods: The initial alignment phase of fixed orthodontic treatment with NiTi or CuNiTi round archwires was studied in a randomly allocated sample of 66 patients. The NiTi group comprised 26 women, 10 men, and the CuNiTi ($27^{\circ}C$) group comprised 20 women, 10 men. The eligibility criteria were as follows: anterior mandibular crowding of minimum 6 mm according to Little's Irregularity Index (LII), treatment requiring no extraction of premolars, 12 to 18 years of age, permanent dentition, skeletal and dental Class I malocclusion. The main outcome measure was the alignment of the mandibular anterior dentition; the secondary outcome measure was the change in mandibular dental arch dimensions during 12 weeks. Simple randomization (allocation ratio 1:1) was used in this single-blind study. LII and mandibular arch dimensions were measured on three-dimensional digital dental models at 2-week intervals. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between NiTi and CuNiTi according to LII (p > 0.05). Intercanine and intermolar arch perimeters increased in the CuNiTi group (p < 0.001). Inter-first premolar width showed a statistically significant interaction in week ${\times}$ diameter ${\times}$ application (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The effects of NiTi and CuNiTi round archwires were similar in terms of their alignment efficiency. However, the intercanine and intermolar arch perimeters, and the inter-first premolar width changes differed between groups.
Keywords
Three-dimensional digital dental cast analysis; Nitinol; Copper-nickel-titanium; Wire;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Maltagliati LA, Myiahira YI, Fattori L, Filho LC, Cardoso M. Transversal changes in dental arches from non-extraction treatment with self ligating brackets. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:39-45.   DOI
2 Dalstra M, Melsen B. Does the transition temperature of Cu-NiTi archwires affect the amount of tooth movement during alignment? Orthod Craniofac Res 2004;7:21-5.   DOI
3 Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:597-602.   DOI
4 Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ, Yancey JM, Van Stewart A, Scarfe WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998;68:53-60.
5 Sadowsky C, Sakols EI. Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod 1982;82:456-63.   DOI
6 Franchi L, Baccetti T, Camporesi M, Lupoli M. Maxillary arch changes during leveling and aligning with fixed appliances and low-friction ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:88-91.   DOI
7 Almeida MR, Futagami C, Conti AC, Oltramari-Navarro PV, Navarro Rde L. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: a CBCT and dental cast study. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:50-7.
8 Lundstrom AF. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr 1925;11:1022-42.   DOI
9 Strang RHW. The fallacy of denture expansion as a treatment procedure. Angle Orthod 1949;19:12-22.
10 Karunakara RV. Nickel titanium wires in orthodontics: a review. J Dent Oral Biosci 2012;3:40-2.
11 Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
12 McNamara JA, Brudon WL, Kokich VG. Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press; 2001.
13 Yoneyama T, Doi H, Hamanaka H, Yamamoto M, Kuroda T. Bending properties and transformation temperatures of heat treated Ni-Ti alloy wire for orthodontic appliances. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:399-402.   DOI
14 Santoro M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part I: temperature transitional ranges. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:587-93.   DOI
15 Kusy RP. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. Angle Orthod 1997;67:197-207.
16 Sachdeva R. Sure-smile: technology-driven solution for orthodontics. Tex Dent J 2002;119:608-15.
17 Yoneyama T, Miyazaki S. Shape memory alloys for biomedical applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Pub., Boca Raton; CRC Press; 2009.
18 Gravina MA, Brunharo IH, Canavarro C, Elias CN, Quintao CC. Mechanical properties of NiTi and CuNiTi shape-memory wires used in orthodontic treatment. Part 1: stress-strain tests. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:35-42.
19 Sarul M, Kowala B, Antoszewska J. Comparison of elastic properties of nickel-titanium orthodontic archwires. Adv Clin Exp Med 2013;22:253-60.
20 O'Brien K, Lewis D, Shaw W, Combe E. A clinical trial of aligning archwires. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:380-4.   DOI
21 Riley M, Bearn DR. A systematic review of clinical trials of aligning archwires. J Orthod 2009;36:42-51; discussion 15.   DOI
22 Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Alleviation of mandibular anterior crowding with copper- nickeltitanium vs nickel-titanium wires: a double-blind randomized control trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:152.e1-7; discussion 152-3.
23 Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L. Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:331-9.   DOI
24 Abdelrahman RSh, Al-Nimri KS, Al Maaitah EF. A clinical comparison of three aligning archwires in terms of alignment efficiency: a prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2015;85:434-9.   DOI
25 Waters NE. A rationale for the selection of orthodontic wires. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:240-5.   DOI
26 Ong E, Ho C, Miles P. Alignment efficiency and discomfort of three orthodontic archwire sequences: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthod 2011;38:32-9.   DOI
27 Flores-Mir C. Attaining a working archwire--which sequence? Evid Based Dent 2007;8:48.   DOI
28 Mandall N, Lowe C, Worthington H, Sandler J, Derwent S, Abdi-Oskouei M, et al. Which orthodontic archwire sequence? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:561-6.   DOI
29 Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jager A, Bourauel C. A systematic review and metaanalysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014;17:197-215.   DOI
30 Sandhu SS, Shetty VS, Mogra S, Varghese J, Sandhu J, Sandhu JS. Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2012;82:915-21.   DOI