Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.13

A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type  

Lee, Souk Min (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Hwang, Chung-Ju (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformities, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.45, no.1, 2015 , pp. 13-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the frictional force (FR) in self-ligating brackets among different bracket-archwire angles, bracket materials, and archwire types. Methods: Passive and active metal self-ligating brackets and active ceramic self-ligating brackets were included as experimental groups, while conventional twin metal brackets served as a control group. All brackets were maxillary premolar brackets with 0.022 inch [in] slots and a $-7^{\circ}$ torque. The orthodontic wires used included 0.018 round and $0.019{\times}0.025$ in rectangular stainless steel wires. The FR was measured at $0^{\circ}$, $5^{\circ}$, and $10^{\circ}$ angulations as the wire was drawn through the bracket slots after attaching brackets from each group to the universal testing machine. Static and kinetic FRs were also measured. Results: The passive self-ligating brackets generated a lower FR than all the other brackets. Static and kinetic FRs generally increased with an increase in the bracket-archwire angulation, and the rectangular wire caused significantly higher static and kinetic FRs than the round wire (p < 0.001). The metal passive self-ligating brackets exhibited the lowest static FR at the $0^{\circ}$ angulation and a lower increase in static and kinetic FRs with an increase in bracket-archwire angulation than the other brackets, while the conventional twin brackets showed a greater increase than all three experimental brackets. Conclusions: The passive self-ligating brackets showed the lowest FR in this study. Self-ligating brackets can generate varying FRs in vitro according to the wire size, surface characteristics, and bracket-archwire angulation.
Keywords
Ceramic self-ligating bracket; Metal self-ligating bracket; Static frictional force; Kinetic frictional force;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1982;13:563-71.
2 Lee JH, Lee KS. An experimental study of dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Korean J Orthod 2001;31:467-77.
3 Min JM, Suhr CH. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic brackets and arch wire during sliding movement of teeth. Korean J Orthod 1988;18:155-63.
4 Sung HM, Park YC. Comparison of the frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket & archwire. Korean J Orthod 1991;21:543-59.
5 Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis, USA: the C.V. Mosby Co.; 1986. p. 263.
6 Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:472-82.   DOI
7 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:199-208.   DOI
8 Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracketarchwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:403-9.   DOI
9 Maijer R, Smith DC. Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:29-31.
10 Kim H, Kim KY, Kang YG, Kim SH, Kook YA. Clinical considerations with self-ligating brackets. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:474-82.
11 Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283-91.   DOI
12 Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:395-402.   DOI
13 Garner LD, Allai WW, Moore BK. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:199-203.   DOI
14 Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N, Gunsolley JC. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:398-403.   DOI
15 Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 1980;78:593-609.   DOI
16 Shin HJ, Kwon OW, Kim KH. The effect of ligation method on the frictional force between orthodontic bracket and archwire. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:813-23.
17 Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, D'Attilio M. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1041-5.
18 Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of selfligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:295-305.   DOI
19 Kwak C, Kim JB, Son WS. A study on the changes of frictional force between bracket and orthodontic wire with time in artificial saliva. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:283-94.
20 Stoner MM. Force control in clinical practice. Am J Orthod 1960;46:163-86.   DOI
21 Hwang HS, Park YC. An experimental study on frictional forces of various orthodontic wires under artificial saliva. Korean J Orthod 1989;19:245-56.
22 Ko JS, Yang KH. Frictional forces between orthodontic wire and bracket under artificial saliva. Korean J Orthod 1988;18:55-64.