Browse > Article

A Study of shear bond strength of bonded retainer according to the bonding method and type of wires  

Lee, Hyoung-Cheol (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.32, no.2, 2002 , pp. 143-153 More about this Journal
Abstract
The bonded orthodontic retainer constructed from composite and multistrand orthodontic wire provides an esthetic and efficient system for maintained retention. This study was designed to measure shear bond strength of bonded retainers and to suggest a optimal combination of a multistrand wire and bonding method used when bonded retainer was fabricated. 160 sound maxillary and mandibular premolars were used for 80 test samples. After Uniformizing bonding area, length of wire, and thickness of composite, multistrand wire was bonded to fabricated a bonded retainer by direct or indirect bonding method. Shear bond strength and extension length of each sample were measured by a universal testing machine. The results of this study were as follows : 1. In vitro shear bond testing found 6-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest shear bond strength and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least shear bond strength. But, These difference was not statistically significant(p<0.05). 2. In vitro extension testing found 3-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest extension length and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least extension length(p<0.05). The larger diameter wire was used, the larger extension length was shown. But, the strand of wire is not related to the extension length of wire. 3. In comparison with direct bonding method, larger shear bond strength and extension length was shown in indirect bonding method(p<0.05).
Keywords
Bonded retainer; Type of wires; Bonding method; Bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Beam DR Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995 : 108 : 207-13
2 Kusy RP,Stevens LE.Triple-stranded stainless steel wires - Evaluation of mechanical properties and comparison with Titanium alloy alternatives. Angle Orthod 1987 : 57 : 18-32
3 Corti AF. An indirect-bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1991 : 25 : 631-2
4 Chen RS. Prefabricated bonded mandibular retanier. J Clin Orthod 1978 : 12 : 788-9
5 Lubit EC. The bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1979 : 13 : 311-3
6 Lew KK. Direct-bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1989 : 23 : 490-1
7 Read MlF. The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light cured adhesive. Br J Orthod 1984 : 11 : 16-20   DOI
8 Thomas RG. Indirect bonding : simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod 1979 : 13 : 93-106
9 Waters NE. Somemechanical and physical properties of teeth. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1980 : 34 : 99-135   PUBMED
10 Graber TM, Vanasdall RL. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St Louis : CV Mosby, 1994 : 583-623
11 Greenfield DS, Nathanson D. Periodontal splinting with wire and composite resin. A revised approach. J Periodontal 1980 : 51 : 46, 3-8
12 Gazit E, Lieberman MA. An esthetic and effective retainer for lower anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 1976 : 70 : 91-3   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Reynolds IR. A reviewof directorthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975 : 2 : 171-8   DOI
14 Hobson RS, Eastaugh DP. Silicon putty splint for rapid placement of direct-bonded retainers. J Clin Orthod 1993 : 27 : 536-7
15 Ferguson JW. Multistrand wire retainers: an indirect technique. Br J Orthod 1988 : 15 : 51-4   DOI
16 Rossouw PE, Joseph VP.Indirect fabrication of a bonded lower lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1992 : 26 : 413-5
17 Ballesteros TJ, Duke ES, Norling BK, Mayhew RB. The influence of contamination on the bond strength of an etched resin-bonded retainer. JADA 1986 : 112 : 359-61
18 Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. J Clin Orthod 1983 : 17 : 838-44
19 Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978 : 74 : 62-78   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Aguirre MJ. King GJ, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket placement and bondstrength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1982 : 82 : 269-76   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 1977 : 71 : 440-8   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Adenwalla ST, Attarzadeh F. The bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Br J Orthod 1986 : 13 : 159-63   DOI
23 Orchin JD. Permanent lingual bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod : 24 : 229-31
24 Oliver RG, Richards BH. Customized jig for a bonded palatal retainer : a case report. Br J Orthod 1995 : 22 : 191-4   DOI
25 Beam DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH,Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers : the wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997: 111 : 67-74   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998 : 94 : 367-71
27 Cassidy AJ. Storie DQ. Saliva contamination and resin bonding of etched metal retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1987 : 57 : 29-32   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Bantleon HP, Droschl H. A precise and time-saving method of setting up an indirectly bonded retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988 : 93 : 78-82   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Jacoby H. Semi-indirect bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1989 : 23 : 171-5
30 Becker A, Goultschin J. The multistranded retainer and splint. Am J Orthod 1984 : 85 : 470-4   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Schulz RP, Mayhew RE, Oesterle LJ, Pierson WP. Bond strength of three resin systems used with brackets and embedded wire attachments. Am J Orthod 1985 : 87 : 75-80   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Al-Emran S, Hashim H. A chairside bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1997 : 31 : 358-60
33 Weisser JI. Bondable twin lower 3-3 retaining arch. J Clin Orthod 1978 : 12: 557-60
34 Cohen SM, Cassalia B, Hayes R Direct-bonded lingual retainer with a new twist. J Clin Orthod 1994 : 28 : 538
35 Read MJF, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-curedadhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990 : 98 : 259-62   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 1991 : 25 : 619-32
37 Klassman B, Zucker HW. Combination wire-composite resin intracoronal splinting, rationale and technique. J Periodontal 1976 : 47 : 481-6   DOI
38 Orsborn DB. Bonded lingual retainers. Am J Orthod 1983 : 83 : 218-20   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby, 2000 : 529
40 Gottlieb EW, Retief DH, Jamison HC. An optimal concentration of phosphoric acid as an etching agent. Part 1 : Tensile bond strength studies. J Prosthet Dent 1982: 48 : 48-51   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Hamula W. Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive. J Clin Orthod 1991 : 25 : 437-8
42 Axelsson S, Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded labial retainers. J Clin Orthod 1992 : 26 : 480-90
43 Stoller NH, Green PA. A comparison of a composite restorative material and wire ligation as methods of stabilizing excessively mobile mandibular anterior teeth. J Periodontal 1981 : 52 : 451-4   DOI
44 Diamond M. Resin fiberglass bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod 1987 : 21 : 182-183