Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.9

A determination of occlusal plane comparing different levels of the tragus to form ala-tragal line or Camper's line: A photographic study  

Kumar, Sandeep (Department of Prosthodontics and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Surendera Dental College & Research Institute)
Garg, Sandeep (Department of Prosthodontics and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, M M Institute of Dental Sciences)
Gupta, Seema (Department of Orthodontics, Surendera Dental College & Research Institute)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.1, 2013 , pp. 9-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine accurately the part of the tragus to be used to form the Ala-Tragal line or Camper's line in orthognathic profile patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 150 dentate subjects with age of 18-40 years with orthognathic profile were sampled. Life-size lateral digital photographs of the face with fox plane were taken in natural head position. Different angles between Eye-Ear plane and occlusal plane ($OT_1$-OP), Eye-Ear plane and ala-superior border of tragus ($OT_1-AT_1$), Eye-Ear plane and ala-middle border of tragus ($OT_1-AT_2$) and Eye-Ear plane and ala-inferior border of tragus ($OT_1-AT_3$) were calculated using computer software package, AutoCAD 2004. From the three angles formed by the Eye-ear plane ($OT_1$ or FH plane) and the ala-tragal lines, the one closest to the angle formed between Eye-Ear plane ($OT_1$) and occlusal plane (OP) was used to determine the occlusal plane of orientation. The obtained results were subjected to ANOVA F test, Tukey's Honestly significant difference test, followed by Karl Pearson coefficient of correlation test. P values of less than 0.05 were taken as statistically significant. RESULTS. The mean of base line angle i.e. $OT_1$-OP angle ($11.96{\pm}4.36$) was found to be close to $OT_1-AT_2$ angle ($13.67{\pm}1.93$) and $OT_1-AT_3$ angle ($10.31{\pm}2.03$), but $OT_1$-OP angle was found to be more closer to $OT_1-AT_3$ angle. Comparison of mean angles showed that $OT_1$-OP angle in both males (11.68) and females (12.51) is close to $OT_1-AT_3$ angle (males- 11.01, females- 11.95). CONCLUSION. The line joining from ala to the lower border of the tragus was parallel to the occlusal plane in 53.3% of the subjects. There was no influence of the sex on the level of occlusal plane.
Keywords
Occlusal plane; Camper's line; Tragus; FH plane; Simon's classification;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 DiPietro GJ, Moergeli JR. Significance of the Frankfortmandibular plane angle to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:624-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Downs WB. Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 1956;26:191-212.
3 Hartono R. The occlusal plane in relation to facial types. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:549-58.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 van Niekerk FW, Miller VJ, Bibby RE. The ala-tragus line in complete denture prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:67-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL, Zissis AJ. Relationship between Ala-tragus line and natural occlusal plane. Implications in denture prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 1986;17:253-5.
6 Swenson MG. Complete Dentures. 2nd ed, St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1947. p. 177-80.
7 McGee GF. Tooth placement and base contour in denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:651-7.   DOI
8 Sloane RB, Cook J. A guide to the orientation of the plane of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:53-65.   DOI
9 L'Estrange PR, Vig PS. A comparative study of the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:495-503.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Landa LS. Practical guidelines for complete denture esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:285-98.
11 Terrell WH. Fundamentals important to good complete denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:740-52.   DOI
12 Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to determine the angulation of the occlusal plane in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:81-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chaconas SJ, Gonidis D. A cephalometric technique for prosthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:567-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Boucher CO. Discussion of laws of articulation. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:45-8.   DOI
15 Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Cephalometrically predicted occlusal plane: implications in removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:258-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Augsburger RH. Occlusal plane relation to facial type. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:755-70.   DOI
17 Hall WA Jr. Important factors in adequate denture occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:764-75.   DOI
18 Simon PW. Fundamental principles of a systemic diagnosis of dental anomalies. Boston: Stratford Company; 1926. p.242.
19 Nagle R, Sears VH. Denture Prosthetics. 2nd ed. St. Louis; The CV Mosby; 1962. p. 134-6.
20 Yasaki M. The height of occlusal rim and the interocclusal distance. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:26-31.   DOI
21 Lundström F. Registration of natural head posture in children. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:147-52.
22 Solow B, Tallgren A. Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29:591-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Gavan JA, Washburn SL, Lewis PH. Photography: an an- thropometric tool. Am J Phys Anthropol 1952;10:331-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements.1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Cooke MS, Wei SH. The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:280-8.   DOI   ScienceOn