1 |
Langhoff JD, Voelter K, Scharnweber D, Schnabelrauch M, Schlottig F, Hefti T, Kalchofner K, Nuss K, von Rechenberg B. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1125-32.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Stejskal J, Stejskal VD. The role of metals in autoimmunity and the link to neuroendocrinology. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 1999;20: 351-64.
|
3 |
Weingart D, Steinemann S, Schilli W, Strub JR, Hellerich U, Assenmacher J, Simpson J. Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23:450-2.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:599-604.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Gallez F, Jung RE, Weber FE. The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:691-5.
|
6 |
Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:158-66.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:322-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Nebe B, Forster C, Pommerenke H, Fulda G, Behrend D, Bernewski U, Schmitz KP, Rychly J. Structural alterations of adhesion mediating components in cells cultured on poly-beta-hydroxy butyric acid. Biomaterials 2001;22:2425-34.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:155-66.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Response of MG63 osteoblastlike cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-32.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Lee JH, Lim HS, Lim JH, Cho IH. The effect of resorbable membrane and xenogenic graft materials on implant stability and peri-implant tissue reaction. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;5:70-95.
|
13 |
Yim JH, Lim HS, Lim JH, Cho IH. The effect of various graft materials on the stability of implant and peri-implant tissue response in rabbit tibia. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;5: 41-64.
|
14 |
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-44.
|
15 |
Stadlinger B, Hennig M, Eckelt U, Kuhlisch E, Mai R. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:585-92.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Heydecke G, Kohal R, Gla¨ser R. Optimal esthetics in single-tooth replacement with the Re-Implant system: a case report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:184-9.
|
17 |
Palmieri A, Pezzetti F, Brunelli G, Lo Muzio L, Scarano A, Scapoli L, Martinelli M, Arlotti M, Guerzoni L, Rubini C, Carinci F. Shortperiod effects of zirconia and titanium on osteoblast microRNAs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:200-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:536-43.
|
19 |
Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:329-45.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Hempel U, Hefti T, Kalbacova M, Wolf-Brandstetter C, Dieter P, Schlottig F. Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:174-81.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Schliephake H, Scharnweber D. Chemical and biological functionalization of titanium for dental implants. J Mater Chem 2008;18:2404-14.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Roessler S, Zimmermann R, Scharnweber D, Werner C, Worch H. Characterization of oxide layers on Ti6Al4V and titanium by streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Colloid Surf B: Biointerfaces 2002;26:387-95.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Leong YK, Scales PJ, Healy TW, Boger DV. Effect of particle size on colloidal zirconia rheology at the isoelectric point. J Am Ceram Soc 1995;78:2209-12.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Shin D, Blanchard SB, Ito M, Chu TM. Peripheral quantitative computer tomographic, histomorphometric, and removal torque analyses of two different non-coated implants in a rabbit model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:242-50.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Ge′det P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:818-28.
DOI
ScienceOn
|