Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.4.318

Retrievable SCP (screw-cement prosthesis) implant-supported fixed partial dentures in a fully edentulous patient: a case report  

Kim, Joo-Hyeun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Yun, Bo-Hyeok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jang, Jung-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.50, no.4, 2012 , pp. 318-323 More about this Journal
Abstract
Implant prostheses were classified into screw-retained prosthesis and cement-retained prosthesis by their method of retaining, and there is screw and cement retained implant prosthesis (SCRP) which has been made reflecting the strengths of these two. The advantages of the SCRP technique are easy retrievability and passive fit of implant prostheses. However, the occlusal screw holes of implant prostheses can be thought as a disadvantage with respect to esthetics and occlusion. Inappropriately positioned implants also limited the use of the SCRP technique. The present study is reporting about the case where nine implants (US II, OSSTEM, Seoul, Korea) were placed in maxilla and eight in mandible respectively in fully edentulous patients. Then, the cement-retained prosthesis was applied for the part in which the screw hole positioned improperly, and screw-retained prosthesis for properly positioned implants so that the combined screw-cement prosthesis has been produced where the satisfying result has shown in both function and esthetics. Three-year follow-up has been done for the patient.
Keywords
Full edentulous; Implant; Fixed prosthesis; Screw-cement prosthesis; Retrievability;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
2 Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in fullarch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-78.
4 Kim SG, Park JU, Jeong JH, Bae C, Bae TS, Chee W. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:1061-7.
5 Lindstrom H, Preiskel H. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:34-42.
6 Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implantsupported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7(9):15-8.
7 Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.
8 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 1999. p. 549-93.
9 Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD: Cement retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.
11 Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865-8.
16 Aparicio C. A new method for achieving passive fit of an interim restoration supported by Branemark implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:614-8.
17 Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. The DIA anatomic abutment system and telescopic prostheses: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1997;12:628-33.
18 Voitik AJ. The Kulzer abutment luting; Kal technique. A direct assembly framework method for osseointegrated implant prostheses. Implant Soc 1991;2:11-4.