Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.40

The Features of Norms Formed in Mobile-based Science Problem-solving Processes of Pre-service Teachers - From the Perspective of Digital Citizenship -  

Chang, Jina (Seoul Seong-il Elementary School)
Park, Joonhyeong (Seoul Jamsil Elementary School)
Na, Jiyeon (Chuncheon National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.39, no.1, 2020 , pp. 40-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed the features of norms formed in mobile-based science problem-solving and interpreted them from the perspective of digital citizenship. For this, we implemented two mobile-based science problem-solving activities for nine elementary school preparatory teachers composed of two groups, and analyzed the norms observed in their activities. As a result, four norms were found as follows. First, the information presented as a basis should be scientifically reliable. Second, the information need to be searched widely, but the information should be selected and reconstructed in relation to the problem. Third, in a mobile environment, the ideas should be clearly expressed and understood. Fourth, courtesies in mobile interaction should be represented more politely than in face-to-face interaction. Based on the four norms found in this study, we discussed the characteristics and factors of digital citizenship for judging scientifically reliable and relevant information and expressing ideas clearer in mobile environment. Finally, we suggested the educational implications for fostering digital citizens who can judge and practice 'science issues' in a 'mobile environment'.
Keywords
digital citizenship; norm; mobile-based problem-solving;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Becker, N., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., Towns, M. & Cole, R. (2013). Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 81-94.   DOI
2 Caplan, P. (2008). What is digital preservation?. Library Technology Reports, 44(2), 7-9.
3 Chang, J. & Song, J. (2015). A case study on the features of classroom norms formed in inquiry activities of elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 303-312.   DOI
4 Chang, J. & Song, J. (2016). A case study on the formation and sharing process of science classroom norms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 747-766.   DOI
5 Chang, J., Cho, H., Kwon, O. N. & Joung, Y. J. (2017). Teachers' practical concerns and choices in implementing and designing of mobile-based problem solving: Focusing on the case of elementary science and mathematics gifted students. Teacher Education Research, 56(4), 519-536.   DOI
6 Choi, M. & Park, H. J. (2015). A validation study on the Korean digital citizenship scale through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 47(4), 273-297.   DOI
7 Choi, M. & Park, H. J. (2019). Factors influencing teachers' levels of digital citizenship: Implications for digital citizenship education. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(1), 275-310.   DOI
8 Hechter, M. & Opp, K. D. (2001). What have we learned about the emergence of social norms. In Hechter, M. & Opp, K. D. (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 394-415). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9 Chu, B.-W. (2006). Democratic citizenship education in internet age. Elementary Moral Education, 20, 74-102.
10 Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 798-812.   DOI
11 Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation.
12 Jho, H. & Song, J. (2010). Educational implications about online debates on a socio-scientific issue from a postmodernist perspective: Focus on the mad cow disease. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(8), 933-952.   DOI
13 Kim, B., Kim, H., Park, S. & Lim, S. (2017). Exploration of digital citizenship in intelligent information society in the fourth industrial revolution, KERIS IS RM 2017-6. Korea Education & Research Information Service.
14 Lee, J. (2018). Digital citizenship in the social studies curriculum: From the 6th curriculum to the 2015 revised curriculum. Educational Research, 73, 65-82.   DOI
15 Chinn, C. A., O'donnell, A. M. & Jinks, T. S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 77-97.   DOI
16 Park, K. B. (2014). The citizenship of digital era. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 25(4), 33-46.   DOI
17 Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J. & Ostman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93(5), 859-874.   DOI
18 Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the "digital society". Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 30, 151-176.
19 Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
20 Ok, I. (2017). Exploration of participation types for citizenship education. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 49(2), 55-88.   DOI
21 Park, K. B. (2018). Digital citizenship and connection competency. Social Studies Education, 57(2), 1-15.   DOI
22 Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D. & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6-9.
23 Son, M. & Jeong, D. (2018). A study of science teachers' perception on knowledge information processing competency. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 693-703.   DOI
24 Son, M., Jeong, D. & Son, J. (2018). Analysis of middle school students' difficulties in science inquiry activity in view of knowledge and information processing competence. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 441-449.   DOI