1 |
Kwon, J-S. & Kim, H-B. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and epistemic considerations for activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
DOI
|
2 |
Lee, C-E. & Kim, H-B. (2016). Understanding the role of wonderment questions related to activation of conceptual resources in scientific model construction: Focusing on students’ epistemological framing and positional framing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 471-483.
DOI
|
3 |
Ha, H. & Kim, H-B. (2017). Exploring responsive teaching’ effect on students’ epistemological framing in small group argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 63-75.
DOI
|
4 |
Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
5 |
Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 53-90.
DOI
|
6 |
Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E. & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
|
7 |
Hamza, K. M. & Wickman, P-O. (2013). Supporting students’ progression in science: Continuity between the particular, the contingent, and the general. Science Education, 97, 113-138.
DOI
|
8 |
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemological research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353-383.
DOI
|
9 |
Kitchener, R. (2002). Folk epistemology: An introduction. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 89-105.
DOI
|
10 |
Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19-38). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
11 |
Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
DOI
|
12 |
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S. & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemology in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082-1112.
DOI
|
13 |
Chin, C. & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
DOI
|
14 |
Christie, F. & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and institution: Social process in the workplace and school. New York, NY: Continuum.
|
15 |
Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I. & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.
DOI
|
16 |
Ford, M. J. & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96(3), 369-391.
DOI
|
17 |
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
DOI
|
18 |
Duschl, R. A. (2003). Assessment of inquiry. In J. M. Atkin & J. Coffey(Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 41-59). Arlingon, VA: NSTA Press.
|
19 |
Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554-567.
DOI
|
20 |
Goldman, A. I. & Whitcomb, D. (2011). Social epistemology: Essential readings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
21 |
Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A. & Braten, I. (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
|
22 |
Tsai, C. C. (1999). Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eighth graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in lab activities. Science Education, 83, 654-674.
DOI
|
23 |
Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, 193-205.
DOI
|
24 |
Wickman, P-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325-344.
DOI
|
25 |
Wickman, P-O. & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601-623.
DOI
|
26 |
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
27 |
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
|
28 |
Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31, 65-84.
DOI
|
29 |
Sandoval, W. A. & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
DOI
|
30 |
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
|
31 |
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards. Achieve Inc.
|
32 |
Oh, P. S. & Ahn, Y. (2013). An analysis of classroom discourse as an epistemic practice: Based on elementary science classrooms. Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 269-284.
|
33 |
Oh, P. S. & Ahn, Y. (2015). Exploration of discursiveepistemic mechanisms in high school earth science lessons. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 36(4), 390-403.
DOI
|
34 |
Russ, R. (2014). Epistemology of science vs. epistemology for science. Science Education, 98, 388-396.
DOI
|
35 |
Oh, P. S. (2014). Characteristics of teacher learning and changes in teachers' epistemic beliefs within a learning community of elementary science teachers. Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 683-699.
DOI
|
36 |
Oh, P. S. & Campbell, T. (2013). Understanding of science classrooms in different countries through the analysis of discourse modes for building 'Classroom Science Knowledge' (CSK). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(3), 597-625.
DOI
|
37 |
Quennerstedt, M. (2013). Practical epistemologies in physical education practice. Sport, Education and Society, 18 (3), 311-333.
DOI
|
38 |
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
DOI
|
39 |
National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
40 |
Lee, M-H., Johanson, R. E. & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92, 191-220.
DOI
|
41 |
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E. & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148-163.
DOI
|
42 |
Maeng, S. & Kim, C-J. (2011). Variations in science teaching modalities and students’ pedagogic subject positioning through the discourse register and language code. Science Education, 95(3), 431-457.
DOI
|
43 |
Ligozat, F., Wickman, P.-O. & Hamza, K. (2011). Using practical epistemology analysis to study the teacher's and students' joint action in the mathematical classroom. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2472-2481).
|
44 |
Rzeszow, Poland: University of Rzeszow. Liu, S. Y. & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1055-1073.
DOI
|
45 |
Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J. & Östman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93, 859-874.
DOI
|
46 |
Maeng, S., Park, Y-S. & Kim, C-J. (2013). Methodological review of the research on argumentative discourse focused on analyzing collaborative construction and epistemic enactments of argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(4), 840-862.
DOI
|
47 |
Ministry of Education(MOE) (2015). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education 2015-74 [Issue 9].
|
48 |
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
49 |
Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393-408). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
50 |
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: An international course companion (pp. 69-80). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
|
51 |
King, P. & Kitchener, K. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
|
52 |
Kelly, G. J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
DOI
|
53 |
Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.
DOI
|