Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.1.054

The Characteristics of Lesson Planning of Pre-service Elementary Teachers to Develop Scientific Communication Skills for Elementary School Students  

Na, Jiyeon (Chuncheon National University of Education)
Jang, Byung-Ghi (Chuncheon National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.37, no.1, 2018 , pp. 54-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service elementary teachers to develop scientific communication skills for elementary school students. For this purpose, lesson plans and lesson planning journals written by the 53 pre-service teachers were collected and analyzed. The results of the research were as follows. The pre-service elementary teachers used an implicit and contextual approach to develop scientific communication skills. Teaching and learning activities for enhancing scientific communication were mainly conducted in words or in writing. There were many activities expressing elementary school students' thoughts and presenting the results of experiments in the lesson plan. There were many cases in which the pre-service teachers' lesson plans did not include the evaluation of scientific communication skills. In their lesson plans, there are a lot of mutual activities between teachers and students, team and whole students, and inter-students within teams together, and students' individual activities from requests of teachers. We found that the pre-service teachers had various difficulties when they planned the science lesson to develop scientific communication skills. The pre-service teachers were less likely to refer to specialized materials related to science education when planning their classes.
Keywords
scientific communication skills; lesson plan; pre-service elementary teachers;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ministry of Education (2015a). The elementary and secondary school curriculum [초.중등학교 교육과정 총론], MOE public announcement, 2015-74 [Appendix 1]. Retrieved January 8, from http://ncic.go.kr/
2 Ministry of Education (2015b). The science curriculum [과학과 교육과정], MOE public announcement, 2015-74 [Appendix 9]. Retrieved January 8, from http://ncic.go.kr/
3 Ministry of Education (2015c). The elementary school curriculum [초등학교 교육과정], MOE public announcement, 2015-74 [Appendix 2]. Retrieved January 8, from http://ncic.go.kr/
4 Nature (2015). Building the 21st century scientist. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.nature.com/news/stem-1.17959
5 Norris, S. P. & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.   DOI
6 Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2010). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
7 Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
8 Strangis, D. E., Pringle, R. M. & Knopf, H. T. (2006). Road map or roadblock? Science lesson planning and preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 28(1), 73-84.   DOI
9 Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B. S. & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 875-903.   DOI
10 Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century skills: Learning for life in our times. 한국교육개발원 역(2012). 21세기 핵심역량: 이 시대가 요구하는 핵심스킬. 서울: 학지사.
11 Jung, J. & Lee, B. (2016). Analysis on the mismatch between instructional design and teaching practice of pre-service science teachers in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 435-443.   DOI
12 Kwak, Y. S., Son, J. W., Kim, M. Y. & Ku, J. O. (2014). Research on ways to improve science curriculum focused on key competencies and creative fusion education. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 34(3), 321-330.   DOI
13 Kwak, Y. S. (2015). An exploration of teacher professionalism required for changes in future schooling and curriculum reconstruction. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(1), 93-111.   DOI
14 Lee, H.-K., Lee, S.-K., Kim, H.-J. & Park, H.-B. (2012). An analysis of the form and the content of elementary school lesson plan in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 25(4), 1-29.
15 Lee, M.-J. (2009). Toward to the definition of 'Scientific Literacy'. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 487-494.
16 Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
17 Linn, M. (2003). Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727-758.   DOI
18 Liu, X., Zhang, B., Liang, L. L., Fulmer, G., Kim, B. & Yuan, H. (2009). Alignment between the physics content standard and the standardized test: A comparison among the United States New York State, Singapore, and China Jiangsu. Science Education, 93(5), 777-797.   DOI
19 Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.
20 Ministry of Education (2014). Elementary school science teacher's guide book -general introduction. Seoul: Mirae-N.
21 Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M. & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, (pp. 17-66). Springer Netherlands.
22 DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.   DOI
23 Graber, W. & Nentwig, P. (2001). Scientific literacy: From theory to practice. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek A. Kross & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education-past, present, and future, (pp. 61-70). London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
24 Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 255-260.   DOI
25 Ha, E. (2008). A case analysis on the features and persistence factors of middle school students' science discourse during after-school group activities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University.
26 Ha, J. & Shin, Y. (2016). Analysis of awareness of teachers for core competencies and scientific core competencies. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(4), 426-441.   DOI
27 Hong, M. H. (2013). Activity types in lesson plans on social studies by elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Social Studies Lesson Study, 1(1), 1-21.
28 Hong, M. H. (2017). A study on lesson plans construction using narrative in social studies instruction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(7), 597-619.
29 Jang, M.-D. (2006). Analysis of pre-service teachers' lesson planing strategies in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 191-205.
30 Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N. & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096-1126.   DOI
31 Jeon, S. S. (2013). Development of scientific communication skills test for elementary school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
32 Jeong, H. (2009). A study on the actual conditions of secondary student teachers' instruction design during the teaching practicum. The Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation, 12(3), 1-30.
33 Jeong, H. (2011). An analysis of the perception of lesson plan design among novice teachers. The Journal of Korean Education, 38(2), 29-53.
34 Yang, C., Lee, J. & Noh, T. (2014). The characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 187-195.   DOI