Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2012.30.3.132

Nutritional status of patients treated with radiotherapy as determined by subjective global assessment  

Koom, Woong Sub (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Ahn, Seung Do (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center)
Song, Si Yeol (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center)
Lee, Chang Geol (Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Moon, Sung Ho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center)
Chie, Eui Kyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Jang, Hong Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Oh, Young-Taek (Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine)
Lee, Ho Sun (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System)
Keum, Ki Chang (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.30, no.3, 2012 , pp. 132-139 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective multi-institutional study was to evaluate the nutritional status of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for treatment of head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,000 patients were enrolled in this study at seven different hospitals in Seoul, Korea between October 2009 and May 2010. The nutritional status of patients after receiving 3 weeks of RT was evaluated using subjective global assessment (SGA). The nutritional status of each patient was rated as well nourished (A), moderately malnourished (B), or severely malnourished (C). Results: The mean age of patients in this study was $59.4{\pm}11.9$ years, and the male to female ratio was 7:3. According to the SGA results, 60.8%, 34.5%, and 4.7% of patients were classified as A, B, or C, respectively. The following criteria were significantly associated with malnutrition (SGA B or C; p < 0.001): loss of subcutaneous fat or muscle wasting (odds ratio [OR], 11.473); increased metabolic demand/stress (OR, 8.688); ankle, sacral edema, or ascites (OR, 3.234); and weight loss ${\geq}5%$ (OR, 2.299). Conclusion: SGA was applied successfully to assess the nutritional status of most patients. The prevalence of malnutrition in a radiation oncology department was 39.2%. The results of this study serve as a basis for implementation of nutrition intervention to patients being treated at radiation oncology departments.
Keywords
Malnutrition; Nutrition assessment; Subjective global assessment; Radiotherapy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Laviano A, Meguid MM. Nutritional issues in cancer management. Nutrition 1996;12:358-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ollenschlager G, Viell B, Thomas W, Konkol K, Burger B. Tumor anorexia: causes, assessment, treatment. Recent Results Cancer Res 1991;121:249-59.
3 Ottery FD. Cancer cachexia: prevention, early diagnosis, and management. Cancer Pract 1994;2:123-31.
4 Nitenberg G, Raynard B. Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000;34:137-68.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ottery FD. Defi nition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 1996; 12:S15-9.
6 Rivadeneira DE, Evoy D, Fahey TJ 3rd, Lieberman MD, Daly JM. Nutritional support of the cancer patient. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:69-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ottery FD. Rethinking nutritional support of the cancer patient: the new field of nutritional oncology. Semin Oncol 1994;21:770-8.
8 Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987;11:8-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M. Use of the scored Patient- Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56:779-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Duerksen DR, Yeo TA, Siemens JL, O'Connor MP. The validity and reproducibility of clinical assessment of nutritional status in the elderly. Nutrition 2000;16:740-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ferguson ML, Bauer J, Gallagher B, Capra S, Christie DR, Mason BR. Validation of a malnutrition screening tool for patients receiving radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 1999;43:325-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Thoresen L, Fjeldstad I, Krogstad K, Kaasa S, Falkmer UG. Nutritional status of patients with advanced cancer: the value of using the subjective global assessment of nutritional status as a screening tool. Palliat Med 2002;16:33-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K. Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome - nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition 2001;17:769-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, Burrows J, Lis CG, Grutsch JF. Prognostic significance of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:35-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, Dahlk SL, Lis CG. Can subjective global assessment of nutritional status predict survival in ovarian cancer? J Ovarian Res 2008;1:5.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Gupta D, Lis CG, Granick J, Grutsch JF, Vashi PG, Lammersfeld CA. Malnutrition was associated with poor quality of life in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:704-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Isenring EA, Capra S, Bauer JD. Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. Br J Cancer2004;91:447-52.
18 Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Camilo ME. Does nutrition influence quality of life in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 2003;67:213-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Marques Vidal P, Camilo ME. Impact of nutrition on outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck 2005;27:659-68.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME. Dietary counseling improves patient outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1431-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Van Cutsem E, Arends J. The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005;9Suppl 2:S51-63.   DOI
22 Ottery FD. Supportive nutrition to prevent cachexia and improve quality of life. Semin Oncol 1995;22:98-111.
23 Isenring EA, Bauer JD, Capra S. Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:404-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Unsal D, Mentes B, Akmansu M, Uner A, Oguz M, Pak Y. Evaluation of nutritional status in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a prospective study. Am J Clin Oncol 2006;29:183-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Marin Caro MM, Laviano A, Pichard C. Nutritional intervention and quality of life in adult oncology patients. Clin Nutr 2007;26:289-301.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Makhija S, Baker J. The subjective global assessment: a review of its use in clinical practice. Nutr Clin Pract 2008;23:405-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ. Indications and limitations of the use of subjective global assessment in clinical practice: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006;9:263-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Isenring E, Bauer J, Capra S. The scored Patient-generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and its association with quality of life in ambulatory patients receiving radiotherapy. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:305-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Duerksen DR. Teaching medical students the subjective global assessment. Nutrition 2002;18:313-5.   DOI   ScienceOn