Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2013.9.6.309

A Study for Validation of the Preschool Child Observation Record (COR) for Korean Children  

Shin, Nary (충북대학교 아동복지학과)
Oh, Jeong Soon (충북대학교 아동복지학과)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Childcare and Education / v.9, no.6, 2013 , pp. 309-337 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate Preschool Child Observation Record-II developed by High/Scope for Korean preschool children. The subjects of the study were 255 children aged three to six attending child care centers and their head teachers. They were observed for at least two months and completed the Korean version of Child Observation Record-II(K-COR-II). K-COR-II consisted of six categories and 32 items which had five-level-rubrics. The results from an exploratory factor analysis identified one dimension of the scale, there was no evidence of discriminant validity even after face validity was examined. The concurrent validity and internal consistency of the revised scale were relatively high. Also, the mean between the upper and lower groups with regard to item discrimination showed significant difference. It was concluded that K-COR-II can be used as a valid and reliable instrument to various aspects of preschool children's development.
Keywords
Korean Child Observation Record-II(K-COR-II); validity; reliability; item discrimination;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Goodrich-Andrade, H. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education [On-line] , 4(4). Retrieved February 24, 2011, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume4/number4/index.html
2 Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3 High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. (2003). Preschool Child Observation Record (COR) kit, second edition. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
4 High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. (2005). Child Development Observation (COR) information for decision makers. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
5 Ireton, H. (1992). Child Development Inventory Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Behavior Science Systems.
6 Wortham, S. C. (2010). 유아교육과 평가 [Assessment in early childhood education, 5th ed.]. (김경철, 이진희, 최미숙, 황윤세 역). 서울: 정민사(원전 2008년 출판).
7 Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the Dimensions of Learning model. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8 McAfee, O., & Leong, D. J. (2009). 발달과 학습에 대한 유아평가 [Assessing and guiding young children's development and learning, 4th ed.]. (김경철, 이진희, 최미숙, 황윤세 역). 서울: 학지사(원전 2008년 출판).
9 National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation: Building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/ CAPEexpand.pdf
10 김선영, 신나리, 김향은(2009). 보육. 아동학회지, 30(6), 267-279.   과학기술학회마을
11 변윤희, 현은자(2005). 유아 창의성 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발 연구: 그림책을 활용한 유아예술교육 프로그램을 중심으로. 유아교육연구, 25(5), 271-301.
12 김용석(2009). 사회복지서비스 이용자 만족도 척도의 개발과 평가. 한국사회복지행정학, 11(3), 127-160.
13 김정미, 신희선(2006). K-CDI 아동발달검사 표준화 연구. 아동학회지, 27(4), 39-53.
14 범선화, 채정현(2008). 중학교 가정교과 수행평가를 위한 루브릭(rubric) 개발: 실험 실습법에 적용. 한국가정교육학회지, 20(3), 85-105.   과학기술학회마을
15 신은미, 손복영(2011). 유아교사들이 인식하는 유아 주도성의 의미. 한국유아교육연구, 28(4), 465-492.
16 안은숙, 이지영(2006). 복지보육과 연계한 지역사회 서비스개발을 위한 욕구도 조사. 한국보육지원학회지, 2(1), 17-40.   과학기술학회마을
17 우종필(2012). 구조방정식모델의 개념과 이해. 서울: 한나래.
18 이미화, 이정림, 여종일, 김경미, 김명순, 이경옥, 이완정, 이정욱, 최일선, 최혜영(2012). 5세 누리과정운영에 따른 유아평가 연구: 평가척도 개발. 서울: 육아정책연구소.
19 이은해(1995). 아동발달의 평가 및 측정. 경기: 교문사.
20 제주도교육청, 교육과학기술부(2008). 영유아 언어 인지 사회 정서 발달 평가 도구. 제주: 제주도교육청.
21 조성연, 이정희, 황혜정, 나종혜, 양성은(2008). 아동관찰 및 행동연구. 서울: 신정.
22 한국보육진흥원(2010). 보육교사 전문성 제고를 위한 표준보육과정의 이해와 적용. 서울: 저자.
23 한국어린이육영회(1997). 유아관찰척도. 서울: 저자.
24 Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
25 황해익(2009). 유아교육평가의 이해. 서울: 정민사.
26 Fabrigar, L. R. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.   DOI
27 Follari, L. M. (2007). National Association for the Education of Young Children: Defining best practices. In L. M. Follari (Ed.), Foundation and best practices in early childhood education (pp. 104-124). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28 Goodrich-Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
29 위영희, 조진형, 이정희, 왕영희, 신유림, 백은주, 이혜란, 이정림, 신나리, 한성희, 민현숙(2011). 유아교육개론. 서울: 오래.
30 High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. (1992). Preschool Child Observation Record (COR) kit. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.