Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2012.3.3.009

Advanced Analysis of Connections to Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns using the 2005 AISC Specification  

Park, Ji-Woong (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Incheon)
Rhee, Doo-Jae (Daelim Industrial Co.Ltd.)
Chang, Suong-Su (CONFRA Co.Ltd.)
Hu, Jong-Wan (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Incheon)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures / v.3, no.3, 2012 , pp. 9-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
Concrete filled steel tube (CFT) columns have been widely used in moment resisting frame structures both in seismic zones. This paper discusses the design of such members based on the advanced methods introduced in the 2005 AISC Specification and the 2005 Seismic Provisions. This study focuses particularly on design following both linear and nonlinear methods utilizing equivalent static and dynamic loads for low-rise moment frames. The paper begins with an examination of the significance of pseudo-elastic design interaction equations and the plastic ductility demand ratios due to combined axial compressive force and bending moment in CFT members. Based on advanced computational simulations for a series of five-story composite moment frames, this paper then investigates both building performance and new techniques to evaluate building damage during a strong earthquake. It is shown that 2D equivalent static analyses can provide good design approximations to the force distributions in moment frames subjected to large inelastic lateral loads. Dynamic analyses utilizing strong ground motions generally produce higher strength ratios than those from equivalent static analyses, but on more localized basis. In addition, ductility ratios obtained from the nonlinear dynamic analysis are sufficient to detect which CFT columns undergo significant deformations.
Keywords
Concrete filled tubes; CFT; interaction ratio; dynamic loads; ductility; moment resisting frames;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 AISC Specification (2005). "Specification for Structural Steel Buildings." (ANSI/AISC 360-05), Chicago
2 ASCE (2002). "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures." ASCE 7-05, USA.
3 Azizinamini, A. and Schneider, S. P. (2001). "Moment Connections to Circular Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns." J. Struc. Eng., ASCE, 130(2), pp. 213-222.
4 Deierlein, G. G. (1998). "Summary of SAC Case Study Building Analysis." J. Perform. Construc. Facil., ASCE, 12(4), pp 202-212.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 El-Tawil, S., Kanno, R., and Deierlein, G. G. (1996). "Inelastic Models for Composite Moment Connections in RCS Frames, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete III." ASCE Special Publication, Edited by Buckner, C. D and Shahrooz, B., SEI, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 197-210.
6 FEMA (1995). "NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1 and 2, 1994 ed., Report FEMA 222A and 223A." Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
7 Galambos, T. V. (ed.) (1998). Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Steel Structures. Structural Stability Research Council, 5th edition, John Wiley and Sons, NewYork, NY.
8 Green, T. P., Leon, R. T. and Rassati, G. A. (2004). "Bidirectional Tests on Partially Restrained, Composite Beam-Column Connections." J. Struc. Eng., ASCE, 130(2), pp 320-327.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hajjar, J. F. et. al. (1998). "Analysis of Mid-Rise Steel Frame Damaged in Northridge Earthquake." J. Perform. Construc. Facil., ASCE, 12(4), pp 221-231.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hajjar, J. F. (2002). "Composite steel and concrete structural systems for seismic engineering." J. Construc. Steel Res. 58, pp 703-723   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kim, D. K. (2005). A Database for Composite Columns, Master Thesis in School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Georgia Institute of Technology, Gerogia, USA.
12 Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F., Fenves, G. L. (2005). Opensees Command Language Manual. Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkley, CA, USA.
13 Rassati, G. A., Leon, R. T. and Noe, S. (2004). "Component Modeling of Partially Restrained Composite Joints under Cyclic and Dynamic Loading." J. Struc. Eng., ASCE. 130(2), pp 343-351.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Roeder, C. W. (2000). "Seismic Behavior of Steel Braced Frame Connections to Composite Columns." Connections in Steel Structure 4 (R. Leon and S. Easterling, eds.), AISC, pp. 51-62.
15 Seismic Provision (2005). "Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings." ANSI/AISC 341-05, Chicago, USA.
16 Seon, W. H. and Hu, J. W. (2011). "Continuum Based Plasticity Models for Cubic Symmetry Lattice Materials Under Multi-Surface Loading." J. Korean Soc. Adv. Comp. Struc., 2(3), pp. 1-11.
17 Tsai, K. C. et al. (2004). "Pseudo Dynamic Tests of a Full-Scale CFT/BRB Composite Frame." Proc. of the 2004 Structure Congress, ASCE.
18 Viest, I. M. et al. (1997). Composite Construction Design for Building. Co-published by ASCE, McGraw-Hill, Chapter 5.3., USA.
19 Varma, A. H. et. al. (2004). "Seismic Behavior and Design of High-Strength Square Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Beam Columns." J. Struc. Eng., ASCE, 130(2), pp. 169-179.   DOI   ScienceOn