Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2019.32.5.196

A pilot study of a new fingerprint powder application method for the reduction of health risk  

Kim, Eun-Ji (Department of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Da-Eun (Department of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
Park, Suk-Won (Crime and Scientific investigation Team, Daejeon Metropolitan Police Agency)
Seo, Kyung-Suk (Crime and Scientific Investigation Team, Chungnam Provincial Police Agency)
Choi, Sung-Woon (Graduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.32, no.5, 2019 , pp. 196-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a traditional method to apply fingerprint powder, brush method ("dusting") can create a risk to the health of crime scene investigators due to the inhalation toxicity of harmful and fine powders. Therefore, as a new method of applying powders, we tried to evaluate the potential of a chamber method for the development of latent fingerprint using fans in a closed chamber with a fixed capacity that can prevent the powders from being blown outside and exposed to the users, by comparing with the development results of the conventional brush method. Fingerprints on glass and plastic (PET) were extracted with black powder and green fluorescent powder, and the sharpness and minutiae of the developed fingerprints were compared for each method. The results of the black powder showed similar results, but the effect of the chamber method was slightly decreased when the green fluorescent powder was used. In order to improve the development with the green fluorescent powder, the mixture (50 : 50) of the fluorescent powder with the silica gel was tested and the results were similar to those of the brush method. It is expected that the chamber method has a high potential as a new powder application method considering the health of the crime scene investigator after fine tuning of development conditions with additional studies.
Keywords
powder application method; hazards of fingerprint powder; chamber method; brush method;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. Huynh and J. Halamek, Trends Anal. Chem., 82, 328-336 (2016).   DOI
2 C. Champod, C. J. Lennard, P. Margot, and M. Stoilovic, 'Fingerprints and other ridge skin impressions', 2nd Ed., CRC press, 2016.
3 A. Knowles, J. Phys. Educ., 11(8), 713 (1978).
4 G. S. Sodhi and J. Kaur, Forensic Sci. Int., 120(3), 172-176 (2001).   DOI
5 C. Van Netten, K. Teschke, and F. Souter, Arch. Environ. Occup. H., 45(2), 123-127 (1990).
6 P. Malik and G. Singh, Forensic Sci. Policy Manage., 2(1), 1-4 (2011).   DOI
7 K.-H. Kim, E. Kabir, and S. Kabir, Environ. Int., 74, 136-143 (2015).   DOI
8 W. J. Kim, S. Y. Lee, and J. S. Cheong, Korean Police Stud. Rev., 12(4), 63-86 (2013).
9 F. Souter, C. Van Netten, and R. Brands, Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 2(2), 114-119 (1992).   DOI
10 S. D. Kim and M. J. Choi, J. Sci. Criminal Investig., 7, 33-41 (2013).
11 R. E. Gaensslen, R. Ramotowski, and H. C. Lee, 'Advances in fingerprint technology', CRC press, 2001.
12 M. Y. Omar and L. Ellsworth, Sains. Malays., 41(4), 499-504 (2012).
13 H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, 'Advances in fingerprint technology', Elsevier, New York, 1991.
14 J. James, C. Pounds, and B. Wilshire, J. Forensic Identif., 41(4), 237-247 (1991).
15 J. James, C. Pounds, and B. Wilshire, J. Forensic Sci., 36(5), 1376-1386 (1991).
16 B. Wilshire, Endeav., 20(1), 12-15 (1996).   DOI
17 J. Perez-Avila, Fingerprint Sourcebook-Chapter 11: Equipment, US Department of Justice, Washington DC, 2011.
18 S. Bleay, V. Sears, H. Bandey, A. Gibson, V. Bowman, R. Downham, L. Fitzgerald, T. Ciuksza, J. Ramadani, and C. Selway, Home Office Center for Applied Science Technology (CAST), 2012.
19 G. Sodhi, G. Gupta, and J. Kaur, Res. Pract. Forensic Med., 40, 121-123 (1997).
20 E. A. Barton and R. M. Dameron, Latent fingerprint powder applicator and related method of use, U.S. Patent Application No. 12/890,285, 2012.
21 H. J. Swofford and A. T. Kovalchick, J. Forensic Identif., 62(2), 109 (2012).
22 V. Sears, S. Bleay, H. Bandey, and V. Bowman, Sci. Justice, 52(3), 145-160 (2012).   DOI
23 T. Kent, J. Forensic Identif., 60(3), 371 (2010).
24 J. H. Cho, H. W. Kim, M. S. Kim, and S. W. Choi, Anal. Sci. Technol., 29(3), 142-153 (2016).   DOI
25 E. M. Lee, B. R. Heo, Y. S. Ok, J. K. Kim, I. N. Joung, and S. W. Choi, Anal. Sci. Technol., 29(6), 283-292 (2016).   DOI
26 M. Wang, M. Li, A. Yu, J. Wu, and C. Mao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7(51), 28110-28115 (2015).   DOI
27 S. Moret, X. Spindler, C. Lennard, and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 255, 28-37 (2015).   DOI
28 K. Singh, S. Sharma, and R. K. Garg, Egypt J. Forensic Sci., 3(1), 20-25 (2013).   DOI
29 Roy, Provisional British Patent No. 27769, 1975.