Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology (대한치과마취과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of buffered local anesthetic solutions in pediatric nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Akash Bhatnagar (Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University) ;
  • Disha Gupta (Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University)
  • Received : 2025.08.30
  • Accepted : 2026.01.05
  • Published : 2026.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Local anesthesia is essential for pain control and behavioral management in pediatric dentistry. Conventional anesthetic solutions often have low pH, causing injection discomfort and delayed onset. Buffering local anesthetics, typically with sodium bicarbonate, may enhance efficacy by increasing the pH, reducing injection pain, and accelerating onset. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of buffered and unbuffered local anesthetic agents in pediatric dental patients, with an emphasis on the onset of anesthesia, patient-reported pain perception (subjective pain), and clinician-assessed pain responses (objective pain) during injection. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically focused on pediatric patients aged 4-12 years comparing buffered and unbuffered local anesthetics were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (ROB 2) tool. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model with standardized mean differences (SMD) accounted for variability across studies. The review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251051999). Of the 138 records initially identified through the literature search, five RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included. When compared with unbuffered solutions, buffered local anesthetics demonstrated a promising trend toward faster onset and reduced subjective pain. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in subjective pain scores with buffered agents (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1 to -0.17, P < 0.05, I2 = 66%), whereas pooled effects on anesthesia onset (SMD = -1.55, 95% CI: -3.67 to 0.57, I2 = 97%) and objective pain (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -1.2 to 0.15, I2 = 82%) were not statistically significant. Risk of bias assessment indicated three low-risk studies, one with some concerns, and one high-risk study suggesting a cautious interpretation of the findings. Buffered local anesthetics reduced injection pain, accelerated the onset of pediatric dental procedures, and enhanced patient comfort. Objective pain outcomes are less consistent, but buffering is a promising and cost-effective adjunct to improve clinical experience. Nevertheless, additional high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols are recommended for additional evidence.

Keywords

References

  1. Klingberg G, Ridell K, Brogårdh-Roth S, Vall M, Berlin H. Local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review of techniques and pharmacologic agents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2017; 18: 323-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0302-z
  2. Mittal M, Kumar A, Srivastava D, Sharma P, Sharma S. Pain perception during injection of local anesthesia in pedodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39: 470-4. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.470
  3. Badr SB, Bacho R. Pain perception and effectiveness of palatal approach anterior superior alveolar block anesthesia using single tooth anesthesia in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Dent 2017; 5: 36-42. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpd.jpd_51_17
  4. Remi RV, Anantharaj A, Praveen P, Shankarappa R, Sudhir R. Advances in pediatric dentistry: new approaches to pain control and anxiety reduction in children: a narrative review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2023; 23: 303-15. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.6.303
  5. Kharouba J, Berman G, Elbaharay S, Kaplan N, Efremenko I, Blumer S. Hand-holding's effect on children's pain perception and anxiety during dental anesthetic injections. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6825. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216825
  6. Versloot J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe. Br Dent J 2008; 205: E2. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.414
  7. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RMZ. The effect of pre-cooling the injection site on pediatric pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-10-3-43
  8. Prabhakar AR, Marwah N, Raju OS. A comparison between audio and audiovisual distraction techniques in managing anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007; 25: 177-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.37014
  9. Flanagan TA. Needle-free jet injection: a painless alternative to dental local anesthesia. Dent Today 2020; 39: 108-12.
  10. Baghlaf K, Alamoudi N, Elashiry E, Farsi N, El Derwi D. The effectiveness of different pain reduction techniques during local anesthesia injection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2021; 22: 553-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00563-5
  11. Whitcomb M, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered and unbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Anesth Prog 2010; 57: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.59
  12. Kurien RS, Goswami M, Singh S. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018; 12: 102-9. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.016
  13. Fulling PD, Peterfreund RA. Alkalinization and precipitation characteristics of 0.2% ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 518-21. https://doi.org/10.1053/rapm.2000.8931
  14. Saatchi M, Khademi A, Baghaei B, Noormohammad H. Effect of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized double-blind study. J Endod 2015; 41: 33-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.011
  15. Amorim KS, Fontes VTS, Gercina AC, Groppo FC, Souza LMA. Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 3527-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x
  16. Ackerman WE 3rd, Ware TR, Juneja M. The air-liquid interface and the pH and PCO2 of alkalinized local anaesthetic solutions. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 387-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009051
  17. Catchlove RF. The influence of CO2 and pH on local anesthetic action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1972; 181: 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3565(25)29207-2
  18. Chaney MA, Kerby R, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers W, Weaver J. An evaluation of lidocaine hydrocarbonate compared with lidocaine hydrochloride for inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 1991; 38: 212-6.
  19. Malamed SF, Falkel M. Buffered local anaesthetics: the importance of pH and CO2. SAAD Dig 2013; 29: 9-17.
  20. Meincken M, Norman C, Arevalo O, Saman DM, Bejarano T. Anesthesia onset time and injection pain between buffered and unbuffered lidocaine used as local anesthetic for dental care in children. Pediatr Dent 2019; 41: 354-7.
  21. Dhake P, Nagpal D, Chaudhari P, Lamba G, Hotwani K, Singh P. Buffered articaine infiltration for prImary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2022; 22: 387-94. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387
  22. MA M, Khatri A, Kalra N, Tyagi R, Khandelwal D. Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2019; 19: 101-9. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.2.101
  23. Chopra R, Jindal G, Sachdev V, Sandhu M. Double-blind crossover study to compare pain experience during inferior alveolar nerve block administration using buffered two percent lidocaine in children. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38: 25-9.