기술집약형 중소·중견기업의 기술역량이 기술혁신과 성과에 미치는 영향: 기술이전 유형의 조절효과를 중심으로

Effects of Technological Capabilities on Technological Innovation and Performance in Technology-Intensive SMEs and Medium-Sized Firms: The Moderating Role of Technology Transfer Types

  • 신영애 (충북대학교 지식재산전문인력양성센터 ) ;
  • 임달호 (충북대학교 국제경영학과) ;
  • 김희종 (충북대학교 지식재산스마트융합학과 ) ;
  • 조창삼 (충북대학교 지식재산스마트융합학과)
  • 투고 : 2025.07.10
  • 심사 : 2025.08.22
  • 발행 : 2025.08.31

초록

본 연구는 기술집약형 중소·중견기업을 대상으로 기업의 기술역량이 제품혁신과 공정혁신에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 분석하고, 이러한 기술혁신이 기업성과로 이어지는 경로를 규명하였다. 아울러 기술이전 유형(라이선싱, 기술구매)이 기술역량과 기술혁신 간의 관계에 미치는 조절효과를 검토함으로써, 기술이전 방식의 전략적 활용 가능성과 외부 기술도입의 효과성을 수요기업 관점에서 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 기술이전 경험(라이선싱, 기술구매)이 있는 기술집약 산업 내 중소·중견기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 구조방정식모형(SEM)과 SPSS PROCESS Macro를 활용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 기술역량은 제품혁신과 공정혁신 모두에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤으며, 제품혁신과 공정혁신도 기업성과에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 조절효과 분석에서는 기술구매는 기술역량과 제품혁신 간의 관계를 강화하는 반면, 라이선싱은 해당 관계를 약화하는 것으로 나타났다. 반대로 공정혁신의 경우에는 라이선싱이 기술역량과의 관계를 강화하는 조절효과를 보였으며, 기술구매는 오히려 그 관계를 약화하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 기술역량이 기업의 기술혁신과 경영성과에 핵심적인 역할을 하며, 기술이전의 방식이 그 효과를 조절할 수 있다는 점에서 기술도입 전략의 정합성과 기술이전 정책의 수요자 중심 설계의 필요성을 뒷받침하는 실증적 증거를 제공하였다.

This study empirically analyzed the effects of technological capability on product technological innovation and process technological innovation in technology-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs), and examined how these technological innovation activities lead to firm performance. Furthermore, it explored whether the type of technology transfer(licensing vs. technology purchase) moderates the relationship between technological capability and technological innovation. By focusing on the strategic utilization of technology transfer methods and the effectiveness of external technology adoption, the study aimed to provide implications from the perspective of SMEs. For this purpose, a survey was conducted on SMEs in technology-intensive industries with prior experience in technology transfer(licensing or technology purchase). Structural Equation Modeling(SEM) and SPSS PROCESS Macro were employed to test the hypotheses. The analysis results revealed that technological capability had a significant positive effect on both product technological innovation and process technological innovation, and that these technological innovations positively influenced firm performance. The moderation analysis further showed that technology purchase strengthened the relationship between technological capability and product technological innovation, while licensing weakened this relationship. Conversely, in the case of process technological innovation, licensing strengthened the relationship, whereas technology purchase weakened it. These findings highlight the pivotal role of technological capability in driving technological innovation and firm performance, and demonstrate that the effectiveness of technology transfer can be moderated by the method of transfer. Accordingly, the study provides empirical evidence emphasizing the need for precision in technology adoption strategies and the importance of designing technology transfer policies with a demand-oriented perspective.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2025년 특허청과 한국발명진흥회가 지원하는 지식재산중점대학사업비의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. 강신형·박상문(2018). 중소기업의 기술혁신역량과 혁신성과의 관계: 성장단계별 차이. 벤처창업연구, 13(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.13.2.201804.91
  2. 고행진·김영준(2021). 기술혁신이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 연구: 마케팅혁신, 조직혁신의 매개효과를 중심으로. 기업경영연구, 28(5), 1-28.
  3. 곽기호·김경민(2023). 중소기업의 기술사업화 성과: 기술역량과 실증역량 간 상호작용을 중심으로. 한국혁신학회, 18(1), 225-256.
  4. 김두희(2013). 기업역량이 기술혁신 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 기술이전 유형을 중심으로. 박사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원.
  5. 김현준·이원일(2025). 기술창업기업의 내부적 요인과 외부협력 요인이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 신제품 개발성과의 매개효과. 벤처창업연구, 20(2), 1-22.
  6. 문창호(2020). 기술혁신과 조직혁신이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 두 혁신유형의 보완적 효과를 중심으로. 기업경영리뷰, 11(1), 71-90.
  7. 박지훈·이종선·배종태(2015). 라이선싱 도입이 중소 제조업체의 혁신성과에 미치는 영향: 성향 점수 매칭 분석. 중소기업연구, 37(3), 99-125.
  8. 산업통상자원부·한국산업기술진흥원·한국지식재산연구원(2023).공공연구기관(대학·연구소) 기술이전·사업화 실태조사 보고서, 1-75.
  9. 이대용·전창욱(2015). 중소기업 개발기술 이전의 결정요인에 관한 연구: IP-Market 사례를 통해 본 개별 특허 수준의 라이선싱을 중심으로. 한국기술혁신학회 추계학술대회 논문집, 169-189.
  10. 이선우·김장훈(2024). 중소기업의 기술역량이 제품혁신 성과에 미치는 영향: 혁신 저해 요인의 조절효과. 전문경영인연구, 27(1), 305-319.
  11. 오신호·한상연·배성주(2013). 기업의 재무적 성과 향상을 위한 제품혁신 메커니즘 분석: 공정혁신, 조직혁신, 마케팅혁신의 조절효과를 중심으로. 기술혁신학회지, 16(4), 1006-1031.
  12. 장광순·김용범·구일섭(2010). 기업의 혁신활동과 경영성과와의 관계: 국내 중소제조업을 중심으로. 품질경영학회지, 38(4), 512-520.
  13. 한국지식재산연구원(2021). 2021년 공공연구기관 기술이전·사업화 실태조사 보고서. KIIP, 1-66.
  14. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M.(1978a). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
  15. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M.(1978b). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
  16. Abdul, W. S., Che Rose, R., & Osman, S. I. W.(2011). Moderating effect of MNCs' equity ownership in the relationship between degree of inter-firm technology transfer and local firms' performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 25-41.
  17. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H.(1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
  18. Ayinaddis, S. G.(2023). The effect of innovation orientation on firm performance: Evidence from micro and small manufacturing firms in selected towns of Awi Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00290-3
  19. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
  20. Ahmad, K., & Zabri, S. M.(2016). The application of non-financial performance measurement in Malaysian manufacturing firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00059-9
  21. Bauer, U., Endres, H., Dowling, M., & Helm, R.(2018). Organisational capabilities for technology transfer: a study of R&D-intensive firms in Germany. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 1850041.
  22. Barney, J. B.(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  23. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K.(1995). The development of technological capabilities. In I. U. Haque (Ed.), Trade, technology and international competitiveness (pp. 69-101). Washington, DC: World Bank.Bozeman & Crow, 1991.
  24. Bozeman, B.(2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
  25. Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. M.(1991). Technology transfer from U.S. federal laboratories. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  26. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M.(1976). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.
  27. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R.(2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
  28. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y.(2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  29. Chesbrough, H. W.(2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
  30. Choe, W. J., & Ji, I.(2019). The Performance of Supply-Push Versus Demand-Pull Technology Transfer and the Role of Technology Marketing Strategies: The Case of a Korean Public Research Institute. Sustainability, 11(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072005
  31. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M.(2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015
  32. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A.(1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  33. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010
  34. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M.(2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
  35. Damanpour, F.(1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  36. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S.(2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00227
  37. Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N.(2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
  38. Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A.(2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253-1263.
  39. Forster, R. N.(1971). Technology Transfer and Technical Assistance: A Comparative View. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1(1), 23-34.
  40. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  41. Freel, M. S.(2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242600182003
  42. Friedman, J., & Silberman, J.(2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021674618658
  43. Govindarajan, V.(1984). Approaches to strategy implementation. Planning Review, 12(1), 33-46.
  44. Guan, J., Mok, C. K., & Yam, R. C. M. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 666-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.05.009
  45. Gupta, A. K.(2021). Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: A perspective from Dynamic Capability Theory & Signaling Theory. Technology in society, 64.
  46. Haryani, D. S., Yulius, Y., & Limakrisna, N.(2023). The influence of product innovation on customer loyalty in the beverage product business in Tanjungpinang. International Journal of Economics, 2(3), 41-48.
  47. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K.(1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.
  48. Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, S., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., & Smith, D.(1997). Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00064-X
  49. Hermawati, W.(2019). Technology transfer from public research institute to community: A case study. STI Policy and Management Journal, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2019.150
  50. Henri, J. F.(2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, organizations and society, 31(6), 529-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
  51. Iwu, C. G.(2010). Impact of product development and innovation on market share. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2659-2667.
  52. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P.(1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press.
  53. Kim, L.(1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  54. Kim, L.(1999). Building technological capability for industrialization: Analytical frameworks and Korea's experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/8.1.111
  55. Lall, S (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F
  56. Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M.(2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 615-640. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.181
  57. Lee, K., & Lim, C.(2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00088-3
  58. Leonard, D.(1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business Press.
  59. Lin, Y., Khan, M. S., & Safeer, A. A.(2022). Firm innovation activities and consumer brand loyalty: A path to business sustainability in Asia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  60. Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C.(2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070739
  61. Li, Q., & Gao, H.(2023). How external knowledge acquisition contributes to innovation performance: A chain mediation model. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231219203
  62. Ma, L., Rhee, H., & Kang, S.(2021). The effects of technological acquisition on innovation performance. Sustainability, 13(15), 8832.
  63. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H.(1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304
  64. Molina-Domene, M. A., & Pietrobelli, C.(2012). Drivers of technological capabilities in developing countries: An econometric analysis of Argentina, Brazil and Chile. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.11.003
  65. Noh, H., Kang, S., & Lee, S.(2019). Patterns of international technology acquisition in a post catch‑up country: The case of Korean firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 27(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2019.1594320
  66. OECD(2023). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2023: Enabling transitions in times of disruption. OECD Publishing.
  67. OECD(2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd Edition.
  68. Omar, M. F., Mohd Yusoff, R., & Majid, I. A.(2012). Measuring of technological capabilities in technology transfer(TT) projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 417-423. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n15p211
  69. Piening, E. P., & Salge, T. O.(2015). Understanding the antecedents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12225
  70. Polder, M., van Leeuwen, G., Mohnen, P., & Raymond, W.(2010). Product, process and organizational innovation: Drivers, complementarity and productivity effects. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2010(04), OECD Publishing.
  71. Rogers, E. M.(2002). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  72. Reichstein, T., & Salter, A.(2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), 653-682 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014
  73. Schumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W.(2018). Organisational capabilities for technology transfer: A study of R&D-intensive firms in Germany. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 1-31.
  74. Sime, S., Hagedoorn, J., & Hui, T.(2023). Innovation performance and licensing: The effect of the compositional quality of direct and indirect network ties. Technovation, 127, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102826
  75. Thompson, V. A.(1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391646
  76. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J.(1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
  77. Van de Ven, A. H.(1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  78. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V.(1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/258398
  79. Wahab, S. A., Rose, R. C., Uli, J., & Abdullah, H.(2009). A review on the technology transfer models, knowledge-based and organizational learning models on technology transfer. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), 550-561.
  80. Wang, H. J., Song, C., & Shin, K.(2024). Does the impact of open innovation depend on contextual factors? A case of the Korean biopharmaceutical industry. PLOS ONE, 19(11), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310311
  81. Widener, S. K.(2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, organizations and society, 32(7-8), 757-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001
  82. Yam, R. C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., & Tang, E. P. Y. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Technovation, 24(10), 821-833.
  83. Zahra, S. A., & George, G.(2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
  84. Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Liu, J., & Nie, Y.(2023). Technological capability strength/asymmetry and supply chain process innovation. Research Policy, 52(4), 104771.
  85. Zhao, L., & Reisman, A.(1992). Toward meta research on technology transfer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.119659
  86. Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F.(2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.830
  87. Zou, H., Liu, X., & Ghauri, P. N. (2010). Technology capability and the internationalization strategies of new ventures. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 1(1), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2010.1.1.14308
  88. Zulkiffli, S. N. A., & Perera, N. (2011). A literature analysis on business performance for SMEs: Subjective or objective measures? In Proceedings of the 2011 SIBR Conference on Interdisciplinary Business Research. 1-9.