Annals of Laboratory Medicine

Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine (대한진단검사의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Revolutionizing Laboratory Practices: Pioneering Trends in Total Laboratory Automation

  • Youngwon Nam (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyung-Doo Park (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2024.10.27
  • Accepted : 2025.03.04
  • Published : 2025.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Total laboratory automation (TLA) is a transformative solution in clinical laboratories that addresses growing demands for operational efficiency, accuracy, and rapid turnaround times in patient care. TLA integrates advanced technologies across pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases, thereby streamlining workflows, reducing manual intervention, and enhancing QC. TLA adoption is driven by factors such as increasing test volumes, the need for cost reduction and regulatory compliance, and labor shortages. Key benefits of TLA include improved accuracy through error minimization, optimized resource utilization, enhanced staff well-being, and consistent delivery of high-quality results. Leading companies, including Abbott, Roche, Siemens, and Beckman Coulter, dominate the global TLA market with innovative solutions. Recent developments incorporate artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, robotics, and Internet-of-things technologies, which enable predictive analytics and automated data management. However, challenges remain, including high implementation costs, the need for workforce training, cybersecurity concerns, and system integration complexities. Future trends indicate that TLA will advance through enhanced AI integration, sustainable practices, and big data analytics, fostering continuous improvements in precision diagnostics and clinical outcomes. Moreover, TLA has the potential to revolutionize laboratory operations globally, driving efficiency, accuracy, and sustainability while ultimately improving patient care. Successful adoption of TLA will require strategic planning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and alignment with emerging healthcare needs. In this review, we emphasize that overcoming these challenges through innovation and robust management is essential for ensuring that TLA continues to play a vital role in modern healthcare systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Dolci A, Giavarina D, Pasqualetti S, Szőke D, Panteghini M. Total laboratory automation: do stat tests still matter? Clin Biochem 2017;50:605–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.002
  2. Kritikos A, Prod'Hom G, Jacot D, Croxatto A, Greub G. The impact of laboratory automation on the time to urine microbiological results: a five-year retrospective study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024;14:1392.
  3. Hawker CD, Roberts WL, Garr SB, Hamilton LT, Penrose JR, Ashwood ER, et al. Automated transport and sorting system in a large reference laboratory: part 2. Implementation of the system and performance measures over three years. Clin Chem 2002;48:1761–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1761
  4. Seaberg RS, Stallone RO, Statland BE. The role of total laboratory automation in a consolidated laboratory network. Clin Chem 2000;46:751–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.5.751
  5. Bailey AL, Ledeboer N, Burnham CD. Clinical microbiology is growing up: the total laboratory automation revolution. Clin Chem 2019;65:634–43. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.274522
  6. Saddari A, Ezrari S, Benaissa E, Lahlou YB, Elouennass M, Maleb A. Robotization in microbiology. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2024;82:489–99. https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1922
  7. McElvania E, Mindel S, Lemstra J, Brands K, Patel P, Good CE, et al. Automated detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with the MRSA CHROM imaging application on BD Kiestra Total Lab Automation System. J Clin Microbiol 2024;62:e0144523.
  8. Trigueiro G, Oliveira C, Rodrigues A, Seabra S, Pinto R, Bala Y, et al. Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles. Microbiol Spectr 2024;12:e0215323.
  9. Antonios K, Croxatto A, Culbreath K. Current state of laboratory automation in clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Chem 2021;68:99–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab242
  10. Jasuja JK, Zimmermann S, Burckhardt I. Applicability and performance of EUCAST's rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) on primarily sterile body fluids in blood culture bottles in laboratory routine with total lab automation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40:1217–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04146-6
  11. López Yeste ML, Pons Mas AR, Guiñón Muñoz L, Izquierdo Álvarez S, García FM, Blanco Font A, et al. Management of post-analytical processes in the clinical laboratory according to ISO 15189:2012. Considerations about the management of clinical samples, ensuring quality of post-analytical processes, and laboratory information management. Adv Lab Med 2021;2:373–89.
  12. International Organization for Standardization IOf. ISO: 15189:2022: Medical laboratories: requirements for quality and competence: ISO, 2022. https://clsi.org/standards/products/iso-documents/documents/iso-15189-2022/.
  13. Illana FJ, García-Osuna Á, Sospedra M, Ferrer R, Martínez-Brú C, Guiñón L. Quality assurance of add-on testing in plasma samples: stability limit for 29 biochemical analytes. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2024;34:020704.
  14. García-Osuna Á, Guiñón Muñoz L, Costa Pallaruelo M, Mansilla Usero A, Cuevas Eduardo B, Llanos Ramos J, et al. Characterization of add-on testing before and after automation at a core laboratory. Heliyon 2023;9:e22096.
  15. Yeo CP and Ng WY. Automation and productivity in the clinical laboratory: experience of a tertiary healthcare facility. Singapore Med J 2018;59:597–601. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2018136
  16. Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1579–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865
  17. Lippi G, Simundic AM, European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). The EFLM strategy for harmonization of the preanalytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1660–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0277
  18. Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Arzideh F, Zierk J, Gurr E, Streichert T. Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:341–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1112
  19. Aita A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The silk road to total quality in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:769–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0331
  20. Kim K, Lee SG, Kim TH, Lee SG. Economic evaluation of total laboratory automation in the clinical laboratory of a tertiary care hospital. Ann Lab Med 2022;42:89–95. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.89
  21. Archetti C, Montanelli A, Finazzi D, Caimi L, Garrafa E. Clinical Laboratory automation: a case study. J Public Health Res 2017;6:881. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2017.881
  22. Markin RS and Whalen SA. Laboratory automation: trajectory, technology, and tactics. Clin Chem 2000;46:764–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.5.764
  23. Holland LL, Smith LL, Blick KE. Total laboratory automation can help eliminate the laboratory as a factor in emergency department length of stay. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125:765–70. https://doi.org/10.1309/3J5P9VJRUP4U5RU5
  24. Angeletti S, De Cesaris M, Hart JG, Urbano M, Vitali MA, Fragliasso F, et al. Laboratory automation and intra-laboratory turnaround time: experience at the university hospital campus Bio-Medico of Rome. J Lab Autom 2015;20:652–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068214566458
  25. Ialongo C, Porzio O, Giambini I, Bernardini S. Total automation for the core laboratory: improving the turnaround time helps to reduce the volume of ordered STAT tests. J Lab Autom 2016;21:451–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068215581488
  26. Armbruster DA, Overcash DR, Reyes J. Clinical chemistry laboratory automation in the 21st century – amat victoria curam (victory loves careful preparation). Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:143–53.
  27. Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Gupta VK, Mallika V. Turn around time (TAT) as a benchmark of laboratory performance. Indian J Clin Biochem 2010;25:376–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-010-0056-4
  28. Howanitz JH and Howanitz PJ. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:311–5. https://doi.org/10.1309/H0DY-6VTW-NB36-U3L6
  29. QYResearch. Lab automation (TTA and TLA) market report:– the global market share and ranking, overall sales and demand forecast 2024-2030. https://www.qyresearch.com/industry-news/4853/lab-automation--tta-and-tla---. (Updated on Jun 2024).
  30. Precedence research. Lab automation market size, share and trends 2024 to 2034. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/lab-automation-market (Updated on Aug 2024).
  31. Wilson S, Steele S, Adeli K. Innovative technological advancements in laboratory medicine: predicting the lab of the future. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2022;36(S1):S9–S21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2021.2011413
  32. Brown AS and Badrick T. The next wave of innovation in laboratory automation: systems for auto-verification, quality control and specimen quality assurance. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;61:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0409
  33. Karnchanaphiboonwong A, Sringam P, Niwattakul K, Krommuang T, Gammie A. Innovation, automation and informatics improves quality in Lerdsin Hospital, Thailand. Br J Biomed Sci 2023;80:11532. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2023.11532
  34. Jitendra Acharya F, Bhesaniya K, Saraswat Panchal JKGNC. Estimating approximate solutions of non-linear Caputo fractional differential equations with forcing functions using Picard's iteration method. Tuijin Jishu J Propul Technol 2023;44:6034–41.
  35. Huang W, Huang D, Ding Y, Yu C, Wang L, Lv N, et al. Clinical application of intelligent technologies and integration in medical laboratories. iLABMED 2023;1:82–91.
  36. Islam MM, Poly TN, Yang H-C, Li YJ. Deep into laboratory: an artificial intelligence approach to recommend laboratory tests. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:990. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060990
  37. You J, Seok HS, Kim S, Shin H. Advancing laboratory medicine practice with machine learning: swift yet exact. Ann Lab Med 2025;45:22-35. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0354
  38. Farrell CL. Decision support or autonomous artificial intelligence? The case of wrong blood in tube errors. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:1993–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0873
  39. Marescotti D, Narayanamoorthy C, Bonjour F, Kuwae K, Graber L, Calvino-Martin F, et al. AI-driven laboratory workflows enable operation in the age of social distancing. SLAS Technol 2022;27:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slast.2021.12.001
  40. Wang H, Wang H, Zhang J, Li X, Sun C, Zhang Y. Using machine learning to develop an autoverification system in a clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:883–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0716
  41. Kim HJ, Kim M, Zhang H, Kim HR, Jeon JW, Seo Y, et al. Artificial intelligence in diagnostics: enhancing urine test accuracy using a mobile phone–based reading system. Ann Lab Med 2025;45:178-84. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0304
  42. Bai J, Cao L, Mosbach S, Akroyd J, Lapkin AA, Kraft M. From platform to knowledge graph: evolution of laboratory automation. JACS Au 2022;2:292–309. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00438
  43. Comeaga ML. Digital transformation of the laboratories. In: IOP Conf S Mater Sci Eng 2022;1268:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1268/1/012001
  44. Ye Q and Zhao B. Analysis of laboratory data management based on LIMS system technology. In: World Automation Congr. (WAC). San Antonio: IEEE, 2022:103–7.
  45. Hawker CD. Nonanalytic laboratory automation: aA quarter cCentury of progress. Clin Chem 2017;63:1074–82. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.272047
  46. Cobbaert C, Albersen A, Zwiers I, Schippers P, Gillis J. Designing a diagnostic Total Testing Process as a base for supporting diagnostic stewardship. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020:cclm-2020-1251.
  47. Cherkaoui A and Schrenzel J. Total laboratory automation for rapid detection and identification of microorganisms and their antimicrobial resistance profiles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022;12:807668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.807668
  48. Yu HE, Lanzoni H, Steffen T, Derr W, Cannon K, Contreras J, et al. Improving laboratory processes with total laboratory automation. Lab Med 2019;50:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmy031
  49. Lu Q, Chu K, Dou H, Smith ZJ. A sample-preparation-free, automated, sample-to-answer system for cell counting in human body fluids. Anal Bioanal Chem 2021;413:5025–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03466-6
  50. Evans JV. Automation and molecular diagnostics: a new era in clinical microbiology. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 2020; doi:10.29074/ascls.119.001883.
  51. Fontana C, Favaro M, Pelliccioni M, Minelli S, Bossa MC, Altieri A, et al. Laboratory automation in microbiology: impact on turnaround time of microbiological samples in COVID time. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:2243. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13132243
  52. Omair AOM, Jabbar AMA, Albulushi MO. Recent advancements in laboratory automation technology and their impact on scientific research and laboratory procedures. Int J Health Sci 2023;7:3043–52. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.2023
  53. Al Naam YA, Elsafi S, Al Jahdali MH, Al Shaman RS, Al-Qurouni BH, Al Zahrani EM. The impact of total automaton on the clinical laboratory workforce: a case study. J Healthc Leadersh 2022;14:55–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S362614
  54. Karadağ C and Demirel NN. Continual improvement of the pre-analytical process in a public health laboratory with quality indicators-based risk management. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:1530–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0019
  55. Vercruysse K, Lambrecht S, Oyaert M. Total lab automation: sample stability of clinical chemistry parameters in an automated storage and retrieval module. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0866
  56. Roundy CS, Lin DC, Klopping PJ, Ence AT, Krezel AC, Genzen JR. Specimen temperature detection on a Clinical Laboratory pre-analytic automation track: implications for direct-from-track total laboratory automation (TLA) systems. SLAS Technol 2020;25:293–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630319881999
  57. Genzen JR, Burnham CD, Felder RA, Hawker CD, Lippi G, Peck Palmer OM. Challenges and opportunities in implementing total laboratory automation. Clin Chem 2018;64:259–64. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.274068
  58. Parra-Robert M, Rico-Santana N, Alcaraz-Quiles J, Sandalinas S, Fernández E, Falcón I, et al. Improvement in the stability of serum samples stored in an automated refrigerated module. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1396–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.10.012
  59. Boyd J. Robotic laboratory automation. Science 2002;295:517–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5554.517
  60. Lippi G and Da Rin G. Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: a personal overview. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:802–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1323
  61. Young DS. Laboratory automation: smart strategies and practical applications. Clin Chem 2000;46:740–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.5.740
  62. Nancarrow SA. Six principles to enhance health workforce flexibility. Hum Resour Health 2015;13:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-9
  63. Rodriques S. Guidelines for implementing automation in a hospital laboratory setting–part II. Clin Leadersh Manag Rev 2007;21:E3.
  64. Ialongo C and Bernardini S. Total laboratory automation has the potential to be the field of application of artificial intelligence: the cyber-physical system and "Automation 4.0". Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:e279–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0226
  65. Loh TP, Cervinski MA, Katayev A, Bietenbeck A, van Rossum H, Badrick T, et al. Recommendations for laboratory informatics specifications needed for the application of patient-based real time quality control. Clin Chim Acta 2019;495:625–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.009
  66. Mencacci A, De Socio GV, Pirelli E, Bondi P, Cenci E. Laboratory automation, informatics, and artificial intelligence: current and future perspectives in clinical microbiology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023;13:1188684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1188684
  67. Hou H, Zhang R, Li J. Artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta 2024;559:119724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.119724
  68. Munir T, Akbar MS, Ahmed S, Sarfraz A, Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz M, et al. A systematic review of Internet of things in clinical laboratories: opportunities, advantages, and challenges. Sensors (Basel) 2022;22:8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22208051
  69. Richardson LC, Connell ND, Lewis SM, Pauwels E, Murch RS. Cyberbiosecurity: a call for cooperation in a new threat landscape. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099
  70. Reed JC and Dunaway N. Cyberbiosecurity implications for the laboratory of the future. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00182