Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bridging farmers' perceptions and laboratory science: wheat bran quality assessment in smallholder dairy systems: technical note

  • Alemayehu Tadesse (Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University) ;
  • Yayneshet Tesfay (Independent Researcher) ;
  • Veerle Fievez (Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University)
  • Received : 2024.11.18
  • Accepted : 2025.03.27
  • Published : 2025.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate wheat bran (WB) quality characteristics based on particle size distribution and to assess how farmers' rankings align with laboratory results. Thirty smallholder dairy farmers qualitatively scored five WB types from five major wheat flour processing factories in Tigray, Ethiopia, on a scale of 1 to 4 for water holding capacity (WHC) and nutritive value (1 = poor to 4 = excellent), as well as the risk of digestive disorders (1 = high to 4 = very low). Laboratory analyses included physical parameters, chemical analysis, and in vitro digestibility. The geometric mean particle size of WB ranged between 908 to 1,103 ㎛, and the WHC between 2.15 to 2.90 mL/g. Farmers' scores for nutritive value correlated positively with crude protein (rspearman's = 0.347; p<0.05) and effective rumen degradability of crude protein (rspearman's = 0.291; p<0.05), and negatively with particle size (rspearman's = -0.553; p<0.05). Scores for WHC positively correlated with particle size (rspearman's = 0.526; p<0.05). The present findings revealed that particle size distribution is the predominant qualitative selection criteria for farmers (e.g., on the market) to assess WB quality, and this qualitative appreciation is to some extent related to chemical characteristics and rumen degradability.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to express their sincere appreciation to the dairy farmers who participated in the study.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Ethiopia: availability and utilization of agroindustrial by-products as animal feed 2018. FAO; 2019.
  2. Tadesse A, Tesfay Y, Fievez V. Exploring dietary quality characteristics related to milk yield of crossbred cows in Ethiopian smallholder farms: a clustering and multivariate analysis approach. Trop Anim Health Prod 2022;54:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02874-1
  3. Jacobs PJ, Hemdane S, Dornez E, Delcour JA, Courtin CM. Study of hydration properties of wheat bran as a function of particle size. Food Chem 2015;179:296-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.117
  4. Onipe OO, Beswa D, Jideani AIO. Effect of size reduction on colour, hydration and rheological properties of wheat bran. Food Sci Technol 2017;37:389-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.12216
  5. Mekoya A, Oosting SJ, Fernandez-Rivera S, Van der Zijpp AJ. Multipurpose fodder trees in the Ethiopian highlands: farmers' preference and relationship of indigenous knowledge of feed value with laboratory indicators. Agric Syst 2008;96:184-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.08.001
  6. Yisehak K, Janssens GPJ. Evaluation of nutritive value of leaves of tropical tanniferous trees and shrubs. Livest Res Rural Dev 2013;25:28.
  7. Wilcox RA, Deyoe CW, Pfost HB. A method for determining and expressing the size of feed particles by sieving. Poult Sci 1970;49:9-13. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0490009
  8. Giger-Reverdin S. Characterisation of feedstuffs for ruminants using some physical parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000;86:53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00159-0
  9. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. AOAC; 1990.
  10. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  11. Lima-Orozco R, Van Daele I, Álvarez-Hernández U, Fievez V. Combined conservation of jack bean and velvet bean with sorghum: evaluation of lab-scale silages and in vitro assessment of their nutritive value. J Agric Sci 2014;152:967-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859614000148
  12. Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979;92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  13. Gizaw S, Abera M, Muluye M, Dirk H, Gebremedhin B, Tegegne A. Smallholder dairy farming systems in the highlands of Ethiopia: system-specific constraints and intervention options. International Livestock Research Institute; 2016. LIVES Working Paper 23.
  14. Kamal-Eldin A, Lærke HN, Knudsen KEB, et al. Physical, microscopic and chemical characterisation of industrial rye and wheat brans from the Nordic countries. Food Nutr Res 2009;53:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v53i0.1912
  15. Zhang D, Moore WR. Effect of wheat bran particle size on dough rheological properties. J Sci Food Agric 1997;74:490-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199708)74:4<490::AID-JSFA822>3.0.CO;2-0
  16. Hossain K, Ulven C, Glover K, et al. Interdependence of cultivar and environment on fiber composition in wheat bran. Aust J Crop Sci 2013;7:525-31.
  17. Auffret A, Ralet MC, Guillon F, Barry JL, Thibault JF. Effect of grinding and experimental conditions on the measurement of hydration properties of dietary fibres. LWT-Food Sci Technol 1994;27:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1994.1033
  18. Heuzs V, Tran G, Baumont R, et al. Wheat bran [Internet]. Feedipedia; 2015 [cited 2025 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.feedipedia.org/node/726
  19. Moran J. Tropical dairy farming: feeding management for smallholder dairy farmers in the humid tropics. Land Links; 2005.
  20. Ibrahim MNM, Tamminga S, Zemmelink G. Degradation of tropical roughages and concentrate feeds in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;54:81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00758-2